RelationWatch
Pricing API Key Sign In
Featured annual report

Top 10 Reasons Associated with Relationship Failure

Explore super-admin-approved yearly rankings for the world and every represented country.

Open Annual Report

Choose one question type, optionally select a country, then view the analysis.

Analyzed public cases4438
Distinct psychological signals46
Pathway stages24044
Countries covered77
Most prominent

Psychological Signals Recorded Across Cases

Distinct analyzed cases
Deception or concealment

Lying, secrecy, or concealment before or during the relationship conflict.

Category: Behavioral pattern · Appears in 53.0% of analyzed cases
2352
Emotional escalation

Intensification of distress, hostility, conflict, or perceived threat.

Category: Escalation · Appears in 49.8% of analyzed cases
2209
Coercive control

A pattern of domination, restriction, intimidation, or enforced dependency.

Category: Control dynamics · Appears in 49.6% of analyzed cases
2200
Family opposition or interference

Family disapproval, pressure, or involvement affecting the relationship.

Category: Family dynamics · Appears in 46.6% of analyzed cases
2066
Premeditation and planning

Advance preparation, coordination, or deliberate selection of method or opportunity.

Category: Planning or impulsivity · Appears in 40.6% of analyzed cases
1803
Jealousy

Distress or hostility associated with a perceived relationship rival or loss.

Category: Emotional state · Appears in 39.0% of analyzed cases
1733
Victim, survivor, or witness help-seeking or disclosure

A victim, survivor, witness, or other affected person reportedly sought safety or support, disclosed abuse or danger, or contacted trusted people, services, or authorities.

Category: Coping response · Appears in 32.8% of analyzed cases
1457
Marital dissatisfaction

Specific dissatisfaction within a marriage, explained through the narrated circumstances.

Category: Relationship stressor · Appears in 31.3% of analyzed cases
1388
Infidelity or competing attachment

A reported affair or attachment competing with the primary relationship.

Category: Relationship stressor · Appears in 28.6% of analyzed cases
1269
Fear or perceived threat

Reported fear or perception of danger, harm, exposure, or loss.

Category: Emotional state · Appears in 28.2% of analyzed cases
1250
Signal categories

Psychological Signal Categories

Relationship stressor339711.7%
Emotional state326011.3%
Control dynamics27579.5%
Behavioral pattern25348.8%
Family dynamics24448.5%
Escalation22097.6%
Planning or impulsivity21437.4%
Coping response21177.3%
Cognitive pattern18796.5%
Post-offense behavior13174.6%
Offender behavior12114.2%
Loss or threat11934.1%
Attachment-related behavior8432.9%
Victim vulnerability6482.2%
Prior violence5942.1%
Suicidal behavior3341.2%
Other330.1%

Each case contributes once to every domain recorded in that case; one case may appear in multiple domains.

Source strength

Evidence-Level Distribution

Explicitly reported2039656.3%
Narrative-supported psychological state1223833.8%
Analytical inference35019.7%
Insufficient information1070.3%
Documented clinical condition120.0%
Least prominent among recorded constructs

Least-Recorded Psychological Signals

Absence may reflect source limitations
Other supported factor

A source-supported factor not adequately represented by another active construct.

Category: Other · Appears in 0.7% of analyzed cases
33
Dyadic reinforcement

Two participants reinforcing each other's harmful intentions or decisions.

Category: Offender behavior · Appears in 0.9% of analyzed cases
42
Multi-motive convergence

Several motives or pressures converging in the pathway to the incident.

Category: Offender behavior · Appears in 1.7% of analyzed cases
76
Loneliness or emotional emptiness

Reported isolation, lack of connection, or a sense of emotional emptiness.

Category: Emotional state · Appears in 1.8% of analyzed cases
79
Financial abuse

Control, extraction, restriction, or misuse of another person's financial resources.

Category: Control dynamics · Appears in 2.8% of analyzed cases
123
Cumulative loss

The combined effect of multiple significant losses or disruptions.

Category: Loss or threat · Appears in 3.4% of analyzed cases
150
Adaptive coping

Constructive efforts to manage distress, loss, conflict, or danger.

Category: Coping response · Appears in 3.6% of analyzed cases
158
Humiliation or shame

Reported or strongly supported humiliation, embarrassment, or shame.

Category: Emotional state · Appears in 4.1% of analyzed cases
184
Extradyadic attachment

Emotional or romantic attachment outside the primary partnership.

Category: Attachment-related behavior · Appears in 4.9% of analyzed cases
218
Partner absence or emotional unavailability

Physical absence or lack of emotional availability within the relationship.

Category: Relationship stressor · Appears in 6.2% of analyzed cases
275

“Least recorded” does not mean least important. It means fewer approved case narratives contained enough information to code that construct.

Reviewer assessment

Confidence Distribution

High2625672.4%
Moderate926625.6%
Low6301.7%
Indeterminate1020.3%
Escalation narratives

Pathway Signals

Distinct cases
Premeditation and planning
1629
Deception or concealment
1606
Emotional escalation
1406
Victim, survivor, or witness help-seeking or disclosure
1278
Infidelity or competing attachment
1211
Coercive control
1150
Family opposition or interference
1056
Instrumental aggression
970
Drill down

Country-Level Psychological Analysis

Click a country name to compare its recorded signals, evidence mix, confidence, and escalation pathways.

CountryAnalyzed casesAnalysis coverageMost-recorded construct
Algeria 9 100% (9/9) Family opposition or interference 8 cases
Argentina 6 100% (6/6) Coercive control 5 cases
Australia 59 100% (59/59) Coercive control 35 cases
Austria 5 100% (5/5) Marital dissatisfaction 4 cases
Bahamas 2 100% (2/2) Anger or resentment 1 case
Bangladesh 8 100% (8/8) Coercive control 6 cases
Belgium 3 100% (3/3) Emotional escalation 3 cases
Brazil 37 100% (37/37) Jealousy 25 cases
Canada 43 100% (43/43) Deception or concealment 25 cases
China 30 97% (30/31) Deception or concealment 20 cases
Colombia 23 100% (23/23) Coercive control 15 cases
Congo 1 100% (1/1) Coercive control 1 case
Costa Rica 1 100% (1/1) Coercive control 1 case
Cyprus 1 100% (1/1) Coercive control 1 case
Denmark 1 100% (1/1) Family opposition or interference 1 case
Ecuador 2 100% (2/2) Coercive control 1 case
Egypt 361 100% (361/361) Family opposition or interference 244 cases
England 169 100% (169/169) Coercive control 119 cases
Ethiopia 9 100% (9/9) Emotional escalation 8 cases
Fiji 1 100% (1/1) Cumulative loss 1 case
Finland 2 100% (2/2) Coercive control 2 cases
France 20 100% (20/20) Deception or concealment 13 cases
Georgia 3 100% (3/3) Adaptive coping 2 cases
Germany 29 100% (29/29) Coercive control 21 cases
Greece 3 100% (3/3) Coercive control 3 cases
India 767 100% (767/767) Premeditation and planning 449 cases
Indonesia 3 100% (3/3) Instrumental aggression 3 cases
Iran 593 100% (593/593) Emotional escalation 402 cases
Iraq 27 100% (27/27) Family opposition or interference 22 cases
Ireland 4 100% (4/4) Coercive control 3 cases
Italy 28 100% (28/28) Deception or concealment 20 cases
Jamaica 1 100% (1/1) Chronic interpersonal conflict 1 case
Japan 108 100% (108/108) Deception or concealment 73 cases
Jordan 11 100% (11/11) Family opposition or interference 9 cases
Kazakhstan 3 100% (3/3) Coercive control 3 cases
Kenya 1 100% (1/1) Deception or concealment 1 case
Kuwait 6 100% (6/6) Anger or resentment 3 cases
Kyrgyzstan 2 100% (2/2) Chronic interpersonal conflict 2 cases
Lebanon 2 100% (2/2) Deception or concealment 2 cases
Liberia 1 100% (1/1) Coercive control 1 case
Libya 7 100% (7/7) Family opposition or interference 6 cases
Lithuania 1 100% (1/1) Coercive control 1 case
Luxembourg 1 100% (1/1) Coercive control 1 case
Malaysia 2 100% (2/2) Emotional escalation 2 cases
Mexico 75 97% (75/77) Help-seeking or disclosure 58 cases
Monaco 1 100% (1/1) Anger or resentment 1 case
Morocco 78 100% (78/78) Family opposition or interference 59 cases
New Zealand 8 100% (8/8) Coercive control 6 cases
Nigeria 4 100% (4/4) Family opposition or interference 4 cases
Norway 1 100% (1/1) Chronic interpersonal conflict 1 case
Oman 2 100% (2/2) Emotional escalation 2 cases
Pakistan 111 98% (111/113) Family opposition or interference 84 cases
Palestine 1 100% (1/1) Coercive control 1 case
Peru 3 100% (3/3) Deception or concealment 2 cases
Philippines 8 100% (8/8) Deception or concealment 7 cases
Poland 2 100% (2/2) Emotional escalation 2 cases
Portugal 19 100% (19/19) Coercive control 11 cases
Russia 16 100% (16/16) Coercive control 11 cases
Saudi Arabia 141 100% (141/141) Family opposition or interference 109 cases
Scotland 3 100% (3/3) Premeditation and planning 3 cases
Singapore 7 100% (7/7) Deception or concealment 6 cases
South Africa 38 100% (38/38) Coercive control 25 cases
South Korea 230 100% (230/230) Coercive control 146 cases
Spain 13 100% (13/13) Deception or concealment 9 cases
Sudan 4 100% (4/4) Deception or concealment 4 cases
Sweden 19 100% (19/19) Jealousy 15 cases
Switzerland 2 100% (2/2) Co-offender facilitation 1 case
Syria 4 100% (4/4) Emotional escalation 3 cases
Thailand 7 100% (7/7) Deception or concealment 5 cases
Tunisia 2 100% (2/2) Deception or concealment 2 cases
Turkey 42 100% (42/42) Deception or concealment 27 cases
Uganda 2 100% (2/2) Fear or perceived threat 2 cases
United Arab Emirates 8 100% (8/8) Coercive control 5 cases
United States 1175 100% (1175/1176) Emotional escalation 619 cases
Venezuela 1 100% (1/1) Chronic interpersonal conflict 1 case
Vietnam 3 100% (3/3) Coercive control 2 cases
Yemen 6 100% (6/6) Family opposition or interference 6 cases

How to interpret these charts

Prominence is based on the number of distinct approved public cases in which a construct was recorded. A case may contain multiple constructs. These descriptive patterns depend on source detail, transcript quality, editorial review, and the countries represented in the database.