Human-reviewed behavioral data

World Psychological Signals

Patterns recorded in approved public case narratives. These charts describe RelationWatch records; they do not estimate population prevalence, establish causation, or provide clinical diagnoses.

Analyzed public cases217

Approved observations2460

Controlled constructs45

Pathway stages1430

Countries covered14

Most prominent

Constructs Recorded Across Cases

Distinct analyzed cases

Help-seeking or disclosure Coping response · 72.8% of analyzed cases

158

Deception or concealment Behavioral pattern · 63.6% of analyzed cases

138

Family opposition or interference Family dynamics · 59.0% of analyzed cases

128

Instrumental aggression Offender behavior · 56.7% of analyzed cases

123

Premeditation and planning Planning or impulsivity · 55.8% of analyzed cases

121

Marital dissatisfaction Relationship stressor · 53.0% of analyzed cases

115

Emotional abuse Control dynamics · 46.1% of analyzed cases

100

Fear or perceived threat Emotional state · 46.1% of analyzed cases

100

Chronic interpersonal conflict Relationship stressor · 41.9% of analyzed cases

Dependency or attachment insecurity Attachment-related behavior · 35.9% of analyzed cases

Construct families

Psychological Domain Mix

Domainmix

Relationship stressor18310.2%

Coping response1659.2%

Emotional state1629.1%

Behavioral pattern1568.7%

Family dynamics1387.7%

Offender behavior1367.6%

Planning or impulsivity1357.6%

Control dynamics1347.5%

Cognitive pattern1196.7%

Post-offense behavior1176.5%

Attachment-related behavior1146.4%

Loss or threat613.4%

Escalation593.3%

Victim vulnerability583.2%

Prior violence341.9%

Suicidal behavior160.9%

Each case contributes once to every domain recorded in that case; one case may appear in multiple domains.

Source strength

Evidence-Level Distribution

2460observations

Explicitly reported152462.0%

Narrative-supported psychological state76231.0%

Analytical inference1747.1%

Least prominent among recorded constructs

Least-Recorded Psychological Signals

Absence may reflect source limitations

Dyadic reinforcement Offender behavior · 0.9% of analyzed cases

Multi-motive convergence Offender behavior · 1.8% of analyzed cases

Financial abuse Control dynamics · 2.3% of analyzed cases

Loneliness or emotional emptiness Emotional state · 3.2% of analyzed cases

Humiliation or shame Emotional state · 3.7% of analyzed cases

Adaptive coping Coping response · 4.1% of analyzed cases

Cumulative loss Loss or threat · 6.9% of analyzed cases

Relationship decision process Cognitive pattern · 7.4% of analyzed cases

Suicidal ideation or behavior Suicidal behavior · 7.4% of analyzed cases

Infidelity or competing attachment Relationship stressor · 8.8% of analyzed cases

“Least recorded” does not mean least important. It means fewer approved case narratives contained enough information to code that construct.

Reviewer assessment

Confidence Distribution

2460observations

High208284.6%

Moderate37515.2%

Low30.1%

Escalation narratives

Pathway Signals

Distinct cases

Deception or concealment

108

Help-seeking or disclosure

104

Premeditation and planning

100

Instrumental aggression

Family opposition or interference

Marital dissatisfaction

Chronic interpersonal conflict

Extradyadic attachment

Drill down

Country-Level Psychological Analysis

Click a country name to compare its recorded signals, evidence mix, confidence, and escalation pathways.

Country	Analyzed cases	Psychology observations	Analysis coverage	Most-recorded construct
Australia	3	42	100% (3/3)	Emotional abuse 3 cases
Bahamas	1	6	100% (1/1)	Deception or concealment 1 case
Brazil	1	14	100% (1/1)	Adaptive coping 1 case
Canada	1	13	100% (1/1)	Co-offender facilitation 1 case
England	1	14	100% (1/1)	Anger or resentment 1 case
France	1	14	100% (1/1)	Chronic interpersonal conflict 1 case
India	121	1204	93% (121/130)	Deception or concealment 77 cases
Japan	2	17	100% (2/2)	Situational vulnerability 2 cases
Mexico	44	620	96% (44/46)	Help-seeking or disclosure 42 cases
Pakistan	14	161	78% (14/18)	Family opposition or interference 12 cases
South Africa	1	14	100% (1/1)	Cumulative loss 1 case
South Korea	4	53	100% (4/4)	Dependency or attachment insecurity 4 cases
Spain	1	14	100% (1/1)	Anger or resentment 1 case
United States	22	274	85% (22/26)	Help-seeking or disclosure 18 cases

How to interpret these charts

Prominence is based on the number of distinct approved public cases in which a construct was recorded. A case may contain multiple constructs. These descriptive patterns depend on source detail, transcript quality, editorial review, and the countries represented in the database.