RelationWatch
Human-reviewed behavioral data

India Psychological Signals

Patterns recorded in approved public case narratives. These charts describe RelationWatch records; they do not estimate population prevalence, establish causation, or provide clinical diagnoses.

Analyzed public cases122
Approved observations1210
Controlled constructs45
Pathway stages762
Average observations per case9.9
Most prominent

Constructs Recorded Across Cases

Distinct analyzed cases
Deception or concealment Behavioral pattern · 63.9% of analyzed cases
78
Help-seeking or disclosure Coping response · 63.1% of analyzed cases
77
Premeditation and planning Planning or impulsivity · 62.3% of analyzed cases
76
Family opposition or interference Family dynamics · 52.5% of analyzed cases
64
Marital dissatisfaction Relationship stressor · 51.6% of analyzed cases
63
Instrumental aggression Offender behavior · 48.4% of analyzed cases
59
Chronic interpersonal conflict Relationship stressor · 41.0% of analyzed cases
50
Fear or perceived threat Emotional state · 39.3% of analyzed cases
48
Coercive control Control dynamics · 32.0% of analyzed cases
39
Financial strain or dependence Relationship stressor · 32.0% of analyzed cases
39
Construct families

Psychological Domain Mix

Relationship stressor9810.7%
Planning or impulsivity859.3%
Emotional state839.1%
Behavioral pattern818.9%
Coping response808.8%
Post-offense behavior738.0%
Offender behavior727.9%
Family dynamics717.8%
Control dynamics616.7%
Cognitive pattern535.8%
Attachment-related behavior525.7%
Escalation303.3%
Victim vulnerability303.3%
Loss or threat232.5%
Suicidal behavior121.3%
Prior violence101.1%

Each case contributes once to every domain recorded in that case; one case may appear in multiple domains.

Source strength

Evidence-Level Distribution

Explicitly reported76863.5%
Narrative-supported psychological state35629.4%
Analytical inference867.1%
Least prominent among recorded constructs

Least-Recorded Psychological Signals

Absence may reflect source limitations
Dyadic reinforcement Offender behavior · 0.8% of analyzed cases
1
Loneliness or emotional emptiness Emotional state · 1.6% of analyzed cases
2
Adaptive coping Coping response · 1.6% of analyzed cases
2
Financial abuse Control dynamics · 2.5% of analyzed cases
3
Humiliation or shame Emotional state · 3.3% of analyzed cases
4
Multi-motive convergence Offender behavior · 3.3% of analyzed cases
4
Cumulative loss Loss or threat · 4.9% of analyzed cases
6
Maladaptive coping Coping response · 5.7% of analyzed cases
7
Relationship decision process Cognitive pattern · 6.6% of analyzed cases
8
Prior interpersonal violence Prior violence · 8.2% of analyzed cases
10

“Least recorded” does not mean least important. It means fewer approved case narratives contained enough information to code that construct.

Reviewer assessment

Confidence Distribution

High104686.4%
Moderate16313.5%
Low10.1%
Escalation narratives

Pathway Signals

Distinct cases
Premeditation and planning
65
Deception or concealment
60
Instrumental aggression
50
Help-seeking or disclosure
50
Family opposition or interference
40
Extradyadic attachment
38
Chronic interpersonal conflict
32
Marital dissatisfaction
31

How to interpret these charts

Prominence is based on the number of distinct approved public cases in which a construct was recorded. A case may contain multiple constructs. These descriptive patterns depend on source detail, transcript quality, editorial review, and the countries represented in the database.