Human-reviewed behavioral data

United States Psychological Signals

Patterns recorded in approved public case narratives. These charts describe RelationWatch records; they do not estimate population prevalence, establish causation, or provide clinical diagnoses.

Analyzed public cases24

Approved observations286

Controlled constructs40

Pathway stages149

Average observations per case11.9

Most prominent

Constructs Recorded Across Cases

Distinct analyzed cases

Help-seeking or disclosure Coping response · 75.0% of analyzed cases

Instrumental aggression Offender behavior · 66.7% of analyzed cases

Marital dissatisfaction Relationship stressor · 62.5% of analyzed cases

Deception or concealment Behavioral pattern · 58.3% of analyzed cases

Dependency or attachment insecurity Attachment-related behavior · 58.3% of analyzed cases

Premeditation and planning Planning or impulsivity · 58.3% of analyzed cases

Emotional abuse Control dynamics · 50.0% of analyzed cases

Victim devaluation Cognitive pattern · 50.0% of analyzed cases

Coercive control Control dynamics · 45.8% of analyzed cases

Fear or perceived threat Emotional state · 41.7% of analyzed cases

Construct families

Psychological Domain Mix

Domainmix

Coping response209.6%

Relationship stressor209.6%

Cognitive pattern199.1%

Control dynamics188.6%

Behavioral pattern178.1%

Offender behavior178.1%

Emotional state167.7%

Planning or impulsivity157.2%

Attachment-related behavior146.7%

Post-offense behavior136.2%

Family dynamics115.3%

Escalation83.8%

Prior violence83.8%

Loss or threat62.9%

Suicidal behavior41.9%

Victim vulnerability31.4%

Each case contributes once to every domain recorded in that case; one case may appear in multiple domains.

Source strength

Evidence-Level Distribution

286observations

Explicitly reported14651.0%

Narrative-supported psychological state12142.3%

Analytical inference196.6%

Least prominent among recorded constructs

Least-Recorded Psychological Signals

Absence may reflect source limitations

Cumulative loss Loss or threat · 4.2% of analyzed cases

Financial abuse Control dynamics · 4.2% of analyzed cases

Jealousy Emotional state · 4.2% of analyzed cases

Loneliness or emotional emptiness Emotional state · 4.2% of analyzed cases

Co-offender facilitation Offender behavior · 8.3% of analyzed cases

Extradyadic attachment Attachment-related behavior · 8.3% of analyzed cases

Impulsive aggression Planning or impulsivity · 8.3% of analyzed cases

Possessiveness or monitoring Control dynamics · 8.3% of analyzed cases

Staging or evidence concealment Post-offense behavior · 8.3% of analyzed cases

Anger or resentment Emotional state · 12.5% of analyzed cases

“Least recorded” does not mean least important. It means fewer approved case narratives contained enough information to code that construct.

Reviewer assessment

Confidence Distribution

286observations

High23180.8%

Moderate5519.2%

Escalation narratives

Pathway Signals

Distinct cases

Help-seeking or disclosure

Deception or concealment

Instrumental aggression

Premeditation and planning

Marital dissatisfaction

Coercive control

Impression management

Chronic interpersonal conflict

How to interpret these charts

Prominence is based on the number of distinct approved public cases in which a construct was recorded. A case may contain multiple constructs. These descriptive patterns depend on source detail, transcript quality, editorial review, and the countries represented in the database.