RelationWatch
Pricing API Key Sign In
Featured annual report

Top 10 Reasons Associated with Relationship Failure

Explore super-admin-approved yearly rankings for the world and every represented country.

Open Annual Report

Choose one question type, optionally select a country, then view the analysis.

Analyzed public cases1
Distinct psychological signals8
Pathway stages3
Most prominent

Psychological Signals Recorded Across Cases

Distinct analyzed cases
Anger or resentment

Reported anger, hostility, bitterness, or sustained resentment.

Category: Emotional state · Appears in 100.0% of analyzed cases
1
Coercive control

A pattern of domination, restriction, intimidation, or enforced dependency.

Category: Control dynamics · Appears in 100.0% of analyzed cases
1
Deception or concealment

Lying, secrecy, or concealment before or during the relationship conflict.

Category: Behavioral pattern · Appears in 100.0% of analyzed cases
1
Dependency or attachment insecurity

Dependency or attachment-related fear supported by the narrated relationship behavior.

Category: Attachment-related behavior · Appears in 100.0% of analyzed cases
1
Financial strain or dependence

Financial pressure, exploitation, or dependency affecting the relationship.

Category: Relationship stressor · Appears in 100.0% of analyzed cases
1
Jealousy

Distress or hostility associated with a perceived relationship rival or loss.

Category: Emotional state · Appears in 100.0% of analyzed cases
1
Maladaptive coping

Coping behavior that worsens distress, conflict, risk, or functioning.

Category: Coping response · Appears in 100.0% of analyzed cases
1
Marital dissatisfaction

Specific dissatisfaction within a marriage, explained through the narrated circumstances.

Category: Relationship stressor · Appears in 100.0% of analyzed cases
1
Signal categories

Psychological Signal Categories

Attachment-related behavior116.7%
Behavioral pattern116.7%
Control dynamics116.7%
Coping response116.7%
Emotional state116.7%
Relationship stressor116.7%

Each case contributes once to every domain recorded in that case; one case may appear in multiple domains.

Source strength

Evidence-Level Distribution

Explicitly reported675.0%
Analytical inference225.0%
Least prominent among recorded constructs

Least-Recorded Psychological Signals

Absence may reflect source limitations
Anger or resentment

Reported anger, hostility, bitterness, or sustained resentment.

Category: Emotional state · Appears in 100.0% of analyzed cases
1
Coercive control

A pattern of domination, restriction, intimidation, or enforced dependency.

Category: Control dynamics · Appears in 100.0% of analyzed cases
1
Deception or concealment

Lying, secrecy, or concealment before or during the relationship conflict.

Category: Behavioral pattern · Appears in 100.0% of analyzed cases
1
Dependency or attachment insecurity

Dependency or attachment-related fear supported by the narrated relationship behavior.

Category: Attachment-related behavior · Appears in 100.0% of analyzed cases
1
Financial strain or dependence

Financial pressure, exploitation, or dependency affecting the relationship.

Category: Relationship stressor · Appears in 100.0% of analyzed cases
1
Jealousy

Distress or hostility associated with a perceived relationship rival or loss.

Category: Emotional state · Appears in 100.0% of analyzed cases
1
Maladaptive coping

Coping behavior that worsens distress, conflict, risk, or functioning.

Category: Coping response · Appears in 100.0% of analyzed cases
1
Marital dissatisfaction

Specific dissatisfaction within a marriage, explained through the narrated circumstances.

Category: Relationship stressor · Appears in 100.0% of analyzed cases
1

“Least recorded” does not mean least important. It means fewer approved case narratives contained enough information to code that construct.

Reviewer assessment

Confidence Distribution

High675.0%
Moderate225.0%
Escalation narratives

Pathway Signals

Distinct cases
Coercive control
1
Jealousy
1
Marital dissatisfaction
1

How to interpret these charts

Prominence is based on the number of distinct approved public cases in which a construct was recorded. A case may contain multiple constructs. These descriptive patterns depend on source detail, transcript quality, editorial review, and the countries represented in the database.