Human-reviewed behavioral data

Australia Psychological Signals

Patterns recorded in approved public case narratives. These charts describe RelationWatch records; they do not estimate population prevalence, establish causation, or provide clinical diagnoses.

Analyzed public cases3

Approved observations42

Controlled constructs24

Pathway stages21

Average observations per case14.0

Most prominent

Constructs Recorded Across Cases

Distinct analyzed cases

Emotional abuse Control dynamics · 100.0% of analyzed cases

Help-seeking or disclosure Coping response · 100.0% of analyzed cases

Instrumental aggression Offender behavior · 100.0% of analyzed cases

Marital dissatisfaction Relationship stressor · 100.0% of analyzed cases

Deception or concealment Behavioral pattern · 66.7% of analyzed cases

Dependency or attachment insecurity Attachment-related behavior · 66.7% of analyzed cases

Depressive symptomatology Emotional state · 66.7% of analyzed cases

Emotional escalation Escalation · 66.7% of analyzed cases

Family opposition or interference Family dynamics · 66.7% of analyzed cases

Financial strain or dependence Relationship stressor · 66.7% of analyzed cases

Construct families

Psychological Domain Mix

Domainmix

Cognitive pattern310.0%

Control dynamics310.0%

Coping response310.0%

Emotional state310.0%

Offender behavior310.0%

Relationship stressor310.0%

Attachment-related behavior26.7%

Behavioral pattern26.7%

Escalation26.7%

Family dynamics26.7%

Post-offense behavior26.7%

Planning or impulsivity13.3%

Prior violence13.3%

Each case contributes once to every domain recorded in that case; one case may appear in multiple domains.

Source strength

Evidence-Level Distribution

42observations

Explicitly reported2866.7%

Narrative-supported psychological state1433.3%

Least prominent among recorded constructs

Least-Recorded Psychological Signals

Absence may reflect source limitations

Chronic interpersonal conflict Relationship stressor · 33.3% of analyzed cases

Fear or perceived threat Emotional state · 33.3% of analyzed cases

Grief and bereavement Emotional state · 33.3% of analyzed cases

Moral disengagement Cognitive pattern · 33.3% of analyzed cases

Possessiveness or monitoring Control dynamics · 33.3% of analyzed cases

Premeditation and planning Planning or impulsivity · 33.3% of analyzed cases

Prior interpersonal violence Prior violence · 33.3% of analyzed cases

Social isolation Relationship stressor · 33.3% of analyzed cases

Staging or evidence concealment Post-offense behavior · 33.3% of analyzed cases

Withdrawal or reduced functioning Behavioral pattern · 33.3% of analyzed cases

“Least recorded” does not mean least important. It means fewer approved case narratives contained enough information to code that construct.

Reviewer assessment

Confidence Distribution

42observations

High3788.1%

Moderate511.9%

Escalation narratives

Pathway Signals

Distinct cases

Deception or concealment

Help-seeking or disclosure

Impression management

Infidelity or competing attachment

Chronic interpersonal conflict

Depressive symptomatology

Emotional abuse

Emotional escalation

How to interpret these charts

Prominence is based on the number of distinct approved public cases in which a construct was recorded. A case may contain multiple constructs. These descriptive patterns depend on source detail, transcript quality, editorial review, and the countries represented in the database.