Psychological & Behavioral Intelligence

Saurabh Rajput Allegedly Murdered by Muskaan Rastogi and Sahil Shukla, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India

← Back to Case World Psychology Analytics ▶ View Event Simulation

Human-reviewed analysis

Psychological & Behavioral Intelligence

This source-based behavioral analysis does not establish a clinical diagnosis, motive, or legal finding.

Case Overview

The source supports a relationship-centered behavioral analysis involving an alleged affair, a marital homicide, reported planning, post-incident concealment, and severe post-sentencing distress. It does not provide clinical evaluations, psychiatric diagnoses, or a complete account of the participants' subjective experiences. The court's statements about remorse, planning, and rehabilitation are reported judicial findings and should not be treated as independent clinical conclusions.

Relationship Dynamics

The reported relationship structure was a marriage between Saurabh Rajput and Muskaan Rastogi alongside Muskaan's alleged romantic relationship with Sahil Shukla. The source portrays the overlapping relationship as central to the case but does not establish how it began, whether Saurabh knew about it, or whether there was prior coercion or violence. The reported homicide and concealment indicate a severe escalation, while the post-sentencing crying and shock show acute distress after the legal outcome.

Escalation Summary

The reported pathway moved from an overlapping romantic attachment within a marriage to a court-described planned homicide, dismemberment, and concealment. After conviction and death sentencing, both defendants reportedly showed acute emotional distress and entered enhanced prison supervision. The source does not establish earlier warning incidents or the precise decision process leading to the killing.

Observed Patterns and Case-Specific Context

Each entry separates the reported behavior or state from the analytical strength of the available narration.

Behavior / construct	Person / subject	Detailed case context	Evidence
Infidelity or competing attachment Relationship stressor	Muskaan Rastogi AccusedWife of the victim	The source explicitly frames the relationship between Muskaan and Sahil as an affair or competing attachment during Muskaan's marriage to Saurabh. This is a relationship structure, not a clinical diagnosis. The report does not establish the duration, emotional quality, or mutual understanding of the relationship. Context or trigger: The source describes Muskaan as married to Saurabh Rajput while also being involved with Sahil Shukla. Reported expression: The reported overlapping relationship placed a competing attachment within the marital relationship. The court treated Sahil as Muskaan's lover and made that relationship part of its account of the homicide.	Explicitly reported Confidence: High
Deception or concealment Behavioral pattern	Muskaan Rastogi and Sahil Shukla	The source reports that the court considered the manner of hiding the body and evidence especially shocking. This supports a behavioral observation about concealment after the incident. It does not by itself establish the defendants' psychological motives or awareness beyond the reported conduct. Context or trigger: The court's reported account described concealment after the homicide. Reported expression: The body and evidence were reportedly hidden after the killing, indicating concealment behavior as described by the court.	Explicitly reported Confidence: High
Premeditation and planning Planning or impulsivity	Muskaan Rastogi and Sahil Shukla	The source attributes to the court a finding that the killing was carried out in a planned manner and with apparent calmness. This supports an analysis of reported advance preparation or deliberate conduct, but the article does not specify the planning timeline, division of roles, or communications. Context or trigger: The sentencing account characterized the homicide as planned and deliberate. Reported expression: The court reportedly described a cold-blooded, planned killing followed by dismemberment and concealment.	Explicitly reported Confidence: High
Instrumental aggression Offender behavior	Muskaan Rastogi and Sahil Shukla	The combination of a court-described planned killing and post-incident concealment is consistent with aggression used in pursuit of an objective rather than only an immediate emotional outburst. The source does not establish what objective each participant sought, so this remains a cautious behavioral interpretation. Context or trigger: The court described the homicide and subsequent concealment as deliberate conduct serving an unstated objective. Reported expression: The reported killing was followed by efforts to dismember and conceal the body and evidence.	Analytical inference Confidence: Moderate
Emotional escalation Escalation	Muskaan Rastogi and Sahil Shukla	The jail official described a marked change from earlier hope for life imprisonment to shock and crying after the death sentence. This indicates acute emotional escalation in response to the legal outcome. The observation does not establish the defendants' emotional state before the hearing or diagnose the reaction. Context or trigger: The trial court imposed the highest reported sentence after finding them responsible for the homicide. Reported expression: Both reportedly became shocked and cried immediately after the death sentence was announced.	Explicitly reported Confidence: High
Fear or perceived threat Emotional state	Muskaan Rastogi and Sahil Shukla	The reported reactions are compatible with acute fear or perceived threat following the death sentence. The legal threat was not final because appellate review remained available, but it was experienced within custody as a major immediate stressor. The source does not record the defendants' own explanation of their feelings. Context or trigger: The death sentence created an immediate threat of the most severe legal punishment, subject to appeal. Reported expression: The source reports shock, distress, crying, counseling, and continuous prison monitoring after sentencing.	Narrative-supported psychological state Confidence: Moderate
Help-seeking or disclosure Coping response	Muskaan Rastogi AccusedWife of the victim	Muskaan's reported questions about appeals show an effort to understand and use available legal support. Her request to write to relatives also reflects an attempt to maintain or restore family communication within prison rules. The source does not establish whether an appeal was later filed or whether the letter was sent. Context or trigger: After sentencing, Muskaan needed information about the available appeal process and contact with family. Reported expression: She reportedly asked how an appeal worked and requested permission to write to relatives and her daughter.	Explicitly reported Confidence: High
Family-system conflict Family dynamics	Muskaan Rastogi AccusedWife of the victim	The reported lack of family visits and Muskaan's repeated questions about her daughter suggest strained or restricted family connection during imprisonment. This may have increased relational stress, but the source does not establish why relatives did not visit or whether the limitation reflected conflict, custody, logistics, or choice. Context or trigger: The report describes limited family visits and uncertainty about contact with an older daughter. Reported expression: Officials said no family member had visited during the reported period, and Muskaan repeatedly asked about her other daughter.	Narrative-supported psychological state Confidence: Moderate
Staging or evidence concealment Post-offense behavior	Muskaan Rastogi and Sahil Shukla	The reported concealment is a post-incident behavior relevant to how the case was understood. It may indicate an effort to alter or hide the apparent evidence landscape, but the source does not describe the exact actions or whether all concealment findings were independently corroborated. Context or trigger: The court's reported findings addressed conduct after the homicide. Reported expression: The source says the body and evidence were concealed after the killing.	Explicitly reported Confidence: High

Behavioral Escalation Pathway

Select a stage to expand it; scroll horizontally to follow the full sequence.

Narrative sequence

1 Overlapping relationship reported Muskaan Rastogi AccusedWife of the victim Infidelity or competing attachment Explicitly reported

The source places Muskaan in a marriage with Saurabh while describing Sahil as her lover. The relationship overlap is the central reported relational context, although its duration and origin are not provided.

Explicitly reported · High confidence

2 Homicide in the home Muskaan Rastogi and Sahil Shukla Premeditation and planning Narrative-supported psychological state

Saurabh was reportedly killed in the home on March 3, 2025. The court later characterized the killing as planned, but the source does not provide a full chronology of preparation.

Narrative-supported psychological state · High confidence

3 Post-incident concealment Muskaan Rastogi and Sahil Shukla Staging or evidence concealment Explicitly reported

The reported court findings included dismemberment and concealment of the body and evidence. These actions became important aggravating circumstances in the sentencing account.

Explicitly reported · High confidence

4 Trial and severe legal finding Case-wide Moral disengagement Narrative-supported psychological state

The court reportedly found the circumstances exceptionally aggravating and stated that the case met the rarest-of-rare threshold. The source also reports the court's view that there was no demonstrated remorse or realistic rehabilitation, but these are judicial characterizations rather than clinical findings.

Narrative-supported psychological state · Moderate confidence

5 Death sentence and acute distress Muskaan Rastogi and Sahil Shukla Emotional escalation Explicitly reported

After the judge announced the death sentences, the jail official reported that both defendants were shocked and cried. They were counseled and placed under continuous monitoring while appellate options were explained.

Explicitly reported · High confidence

6 Post-sentencing legal and family coping Muskaan Rastogi AccusedWife of the victim Help-seeking or disclosure Explicitly reported

Muskaan reportedly asked how to pursue an appeal and sought information about contacting her daughter and relatives. Officials said legal aid and correspondence were available under applicable prison procedures.

Explicitly reported · High confidence

Arrows show the sequence described in the source narrative; they do not prove that one psychological state caused the next event.

Source Limits and Cautions

No clinical diagnosis is reported. The psychological observations rely on the article's translated transcript, court characterizations, and a jail official's account. Motive, internal beliefs, prior conflict, and the exact sequence of conduct remain partly unclear, and the death sentences remain subject to appeal.

← Back to Case