← Back to India casesSaurabh Rajput Allegedly Murdered by Muskaan Rastogi and Sahil Shukla, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India
Case Summary
According to the report, Saurabh Rajput was murdered on March 3, 2025, in Meerut's Brahmapuri area. The court found his wife, Muskaan Rastogi, and Sahil Shukla responsible and sentenced both to death after a trial reported to have lasted about one and a half years. The court described the killing as planned, involving dismemberment and concealment of the body and evidence, and classified the case as falling within the rarest-of-rare category. The report states that the sentence remains subject to High Court confirmation and further appeals.
Basic Information
Country: India
State/Province: Uttar Pradesh, India
City/Region: Meerut
Incident Type: Murder
Relationship Status: Married
Relationship Duration:
Affair / New-Partner Context
Recorded context: Affair started / overlapping relationship
Reported initiator: Unclear / not reported
Relationship timing: During marriage or ongoing partnership, before separation
Incident Date: March 3, 2025
Relationship Journey
Relationship Origins:
- No data available.
Relationship Stages:
- Married Living Separately
Analysis
Contributing Factors:
- Cheating / Infidelity
- Domestic Conflict
- Suspicion of infidelity
Red Flags:
- Secretive communication patterns
- Unusual closeness with a specific third person
- Deception after incident
- Secret affair
Motives:
- Eliminate spouse
- Extramarital relationship
Relationship Outcomes:
- Legal case ongoing
- Homicide during marriage
- Arrest made
- Weapon recovery
- Investigation still ongoing
Source Video
Video hosted by YouTube · Viewer discretion advised
People Link Graph
Saurabh Rajput Allegedly Murdered by Muskaan Rastogi and Sahil Shukla, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India
Relationship Journey Graph
Origin
How the relationship or connection began.
Status
- Married
Stages
- Married Living Separately
Important relationship phases recorded for this case.
Warning Signals
- Secretive communication patterns
- Unusual closeness with a specific third person
- Deception after incident
- Secret affair
Reported red flags or early concern points.
Pressure Points
- Cheating / Infidelity
- Domestic Conflict
- Suspicion of infidelity
- Eliminate spouse
- Extramarital relationship
Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.
Incident
2025-03-03
Outcome
- Legal case ongoing
- Homicide during marriage
- Arrest made
- Weapon recovery
- Investigation still ongoing
Recorded relationship or case outcome.
AI Intelligence Assessment
Relationship Pattern
Infidelity
Pattern Analysis
The reported case centers on a marriage in which Muskaan Rastogi was described by the court as having a relationship with Sahil Shukla. Saurabh Rajput was reportedly killed in the marital home after returning from abroad, and the court described the act as planned and followed by concealment of the body and evidence. The source does not establish the full history of the marriage, the precise origin of the affair, or the parties' earlier conflicts.
Investigative Notes
The report states that Saurabh Rajput was killed on March 3, 2025, in Meerut and that the court later sentenced Muskaan Rastogi and Sahil Shukla to death. The court reportedly relied on findings that the killing was planned, that the body and evidence were concealed, and that the case met the rarest-of-rare standard. The source mentions fines under Sections 302 and 238, although one portion contains an unclear total-fine transcription. Both prisoners were reportedly moved to special barracks, monitored continuously, and informed that appeals could be filed through private counsel or the State Legal Services Authority. The death sentence has not been carried out and requires High Court confirmation, with further Supreme Court remedies available.
Investigation Confusion
The source does not present a major dispute over the identity of the convicted defendants, but it contains inconsistent or unclear dates and details. It refers to the judgment as arriving on October 14 without specifying a year, says the judge joined the Meerut District Court on May 21, 2026, and reports a trial lasting about one and a half years. The total fine is transcribed unclearly in one passage. The report also uses strong court characterizations that should be distinguished from independently verified evidence.
Case Reconstruction / Puzzle Pieces
The reported reconstruction is that Saurabh Rajput, the husband of Muskaan Rastogi, was killed in Meerut on March 3, 2025, after returning from abroad. The court found that Muskaan and Sahil Shukla, described as her lover, acted together in a planned killing, dismembered the body, and concealed the body and evidence. After a reported trial of about one and a half years, Judge Arvind Kumar Mishra sentenced both to death. Prison officials then described their emotional reaction, counseling, special-barrack placement, monitoring, possible prison work, and pending appeal arrangements.
Risk Assessment
The source describes a high-severity relationship-linked homicide involving an alleged overlapping romantic relationship, reported planning, dismemberment, and concealment. The court also reported that the accused showed no remorse and that aggravating circumstances outweighed mitigating circumstances, but these are court findings reported in the source rather than an independent psychological assessment. The death sentences are not final until the required appellate process is completed.
Key Takeaways
The source's relationship intelligence centers on an alleged affair overlapping with a marriage and a severe escalation to homicide. Reported planning and post-incident concealment were treated by the court as major aggravating features. The case also illustrates the importance of separating a trial-court sentence from a final legal outcome because appellate review remains pending. Details about the relationship history, prior threats, earlier violence, and the evidentiary chain are limited in this report.
AI Case Q&A
What early signals mattered most?
The most important reported early signal was the alleged overlapping relationship between Muskaan Rastogi and Sahil Shukla while Muskaan was married to Saurabh Rajput. The source also reports that the killing was planned and that concealment followed, but it does not describe prior threats, domestic assaults, stalking, or specific warnings before the homicide.
Which clues helped connect the case?
The reported clues connecting the case included the court's findings about the coordinated conduct of Muskaan and Sahil, the reported concealment and dismemberment of Saurabh's body, and the concealment of evidence. The source does not provide a detailed itemized account of forensic, digital, eyewitness, or recovery evidence.
Which evidence types appeared strongest?
The strongest evidence types described indirectly were the court record, the reported recovery or concealment findings concerning the body and evidence, and the trial evidence that led to convictions and death sentences. The article does not specify the individual forensic reports, witness testimony, weapons, digital records, or confession evidence relied upon.
Witness / Eyewitness Statements
Dr. Viresh Raj reportedly said that both prisoners cried immediately after hearing the death sentence, were counseled, and were placed under continuous monitoring. He also described their separate positions during the video hearing and said they did not speak to each other after the sentence. No eyewitness account of the killing is provided.
How did follow-up reports change the understanding?
Follow-up reporting shifted attention from the homicide investigation to the death sentence, prison conditions, counseling, surveillance, possible prison work, family contact, and appeal procedures. The report clarified that execution would not occur immediately because High Court confirmation and further legal remedies remain available.
What remained unclear?
The report leaves unclear the precise motive beyond the alleged affair and the court's description of a planned killing. It does not provide the full evidentiary record, the exact sequence of the killing, the method or weapon, the complete history of the marriage, prior warning signs, the exact judgment date, or the status of any appeal. Some dates and fine details are internally inconsistent or poorly transcribed.