On June 16, 2026, in Bahsuma, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India, a 6-year-old boy named Angadveer was murdered. The suspects are his mother, Gurpreet Kaur, a teacher, and her boyfriend, Arpit Sharma, a bank employee. The murder was premeditated and motivated by the suspects' desire to maintain an extramarital affair, fearing the child would expose them. Gurpreet lured Angadveer out with promises of gifts, and Arpit killed him by cutting his throat. Both suspects were arrested following police investigation supported by CCTV footage and digital evidence.
Country: India
State/Province: Uttar Pradesh, India
City/Region: Bahsuma, Meerut
Incident Type: Family Homicide
Relationship Status: Extramarital relationship
Relationship Duration: 3 years
Incident Date: June 16, 2026
Relationship Origins:
Relationship Stages:
Contributing Factors:
Red Flags:
Motives:
Relationship Outcomes:
How the relationship or connection began.
3 years
Important relationship phases recorded for this case.
Reported red flags or early concern points.
Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.
2026-06-16
Recorded relationship or case outcome.
Infidelity
The case involves a prolonged extramarital affair between Gurpreet Kaur and Arpit Sharma while Gurpreet was married. The relationship was maintained secretly and involved deception and manipulation. The victim, Angadveer, was perceived as a threat to the illicit relationship, leading to a premeditated murder to eliminate the perceived obstacle. The pattern shows escalation from infidelity to lethal violence driven by fear of exposure and desire to control the situation.
Bahsuma Police Station led the investigation using CCTV footage, digital forensics including WhatsApp chats and video calls, and witness statements from the victim's grandmother. Both suspects were arrested and are undergoing legal proceedings. The investigation revealed a premeditated plan involving luring the child and committing murder with a knife. The case highlights the role of digital evidence in confirming the conspiracy.
No significant confusion reported. The suspects were identified and arrested based on clear digital and physical evidence. The timeline and roles were corroborated by CCTV and witness reports.
The victim observed the suspects in a compromising situation, triggering fear they would be exposed. Gurpreet Kaur lured Angadveer out with promises of gifts to meet Arpit Sharma, who then transported and murdered the child by throat cutting. Gurpreet created an alibi by traveling to her maternal home. Police used CCTV footage and recovered deleted digital communications to establish the sequence and conspiracy.
High risk due to ongoing deception, manipulation, and escalation to violence. The presence of a child as a witness to the affair increased the risk of harm. The suspects demonstrated coercive control and premeditation, indicating significant danger within the relationship dynamic.
Early detection of infidelity and manipulation can be critical. Children witnessing illicit relationships may be at risk. Digital evidence such as CCTV and messaging apps are vital in reconstructing events and proving conspiracy. The escalation from emotional affair to lethal violence underscores the need for intervention in coercive and controlling relationships.
The victim witnessing the affair and the suspects' fear of exposure were key early signals.
CCTV footage showing the victim entering the suspect's vehicle and deleted WhatsApp chats between suspects helped connect the case.
Strongest evidence included CCTV footage, recovered and deleted WhatsApp chats and video calls, and witness statements.
The victim's grandmother filed the initial missing person report, triggering the investigation. No other witness statements reported.
No follow-up reports available beyond the arrest and ongoing legal proceedings.
No major unresolved issues reported; suspect roles and timeline are clear.