RelationWatch
OSINT Case File

Karan Dev Allegedly Murdered by Sushmita and Rahul Dev, Delhi, India

Case Summary

In Delhi, India, Sushmita allegedly conspired with her cousin-in-law and lover, Rahul Dev, to murder her husband, Karan Dev. On July 14, 2024, Sushmita ground approximately 15 sleeping pills into her husband's dinner (dal and roti). When the sedatives failed to kill him, Sushmita communicated with Rahul Dev via Instagram live chat, and he advised her to electrocute him using a severed extension cord taped to his shoulder. Sushmita executed the electrocution, killing Karan Dev, and subsequently staged his death as a natural medical event. Suspicions arose during the post-mortem discussions when Sushmita, Rahul, and Rahul's father opposed an autopsy. Following the funeral, Karan's brother, Kunal, discovered unlocked Instagram chats between Sushmita and Rahul on a phone left in the bathroom, revealing the murder plan and execution details. The family recorded the evidence, confronted Sushmita, and reported the crime to the police.

Verified True
Confidence 4
Incident Date July 14, 2024
Incident Type Domestic Violence Homicide

Basic Information

Country: India

State/Province: Delhi, India

City/Region: Delhi

Incident Type: Domestic Violence Homicide

Relationship Status: Married

Relationship Duration: Approximately 11 years (marriage)

Incident Date: July 14, 2024

Relationship Journey

Relationship Origins:

  • Met at Workplace

Relationship Stages:

  • Married Living Together
  • Love Marriage

Analysis

Contributing Factors:

  • Cheating / Infidelity
  • Domestic Conflict
  • Property Gain
  • Money / Financial Gain

Red Flags:

  • Secretive communication patterns
  • Discovery of hidden calls or messages
  • Deception after incident
  • Suspects identified
  • Secret affair
  • Secret phone communication

Motives:

  • Money / Financial Gain
  • Eliminate spouse
  • Extramarital relationship
  • Desire for new relationship
  • Property Gain

Relationship Outcomes:

  • Homicide during marriage
  • Investigation still ongoing
  • Deadbody recovery

People Link Graph

Relationship Journey Graph

1

Origin

  • Met at Workplace

How the relationship or connection began.

2

Status

  • Married

Approximately 11 years (marriage)

3

Stages

  • Married Living Together
  • Love Marriage

Important relationship phases recorded for this case.

4

Warning Signals

  • Secretive communication patterns
  • Discovery of hidden calls or messages
  • Deception after incident
  • Suspects identified
  • Secret affair
  • Secret phone communication

Reported red flags or early concern points.

5

Pressure Points

  • Cheating / Infidelity
  • Domestic Conflict
  • Property Gain
  • Money / Financial Gain
  • Money / Financial Gain
  • Eliminate spouse
  • Extramarital relationship
  • Desire for new relationship
  • Property Gain

Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.

6

Incident

2024-07-14

7

Outcome

  • Homicide during marriage
  • Investigation still ongoing
  • Deadbody recovery

Recorded relationship or case outcome.

Sources

English labels are shown first. Original-language titles are preserved for source verification.

AI Intelligence Assessment

Relationship Pattern

Infidelity

Pattern Analysis

The incident reflects a calculated spousal murder driven by an extramarital affair and financial greed. Rather than seeking a legal divorce, which would forfeit claims to her husband's financial assets and apartment, the perpetrator conspired with her lover to murder her spouse and retain his property while framing the homicide as a natural death.

Investigative Notes

The police initially encountered a scene staged as a natural death with minimal physical signs beyond foam at the mouth and minor shoulder burns. Despite opposition from the suspect and accomplices, an autopsy was ordered. The case unravelled when the victim's family discovered unencrypted Instagram chat logs detailing the plot and recorded the evidence before presenting it to law enforcement.

Investigation Confusion

Initially, the death was portrayed by the wife as a sudden natural medical event or sleep-related death. Opposition to an autopsy by the suspect, her lover, and her lover's father briefly created resistance, but police insistence on a post-mortem combined with family discovery of digital evidence dispelled confusion.

Case Reconstruction / Puzzle Pieces

Sushmita administered ground sleeping pills in Karan Dev's dinner on July 14, 2024. When the pills failed to cause death, she messaged Rahul Dev on Instagram, who advised her to use a cut extension wire connected to a live wall outlet. Sushmita taped the live wire to her husband's shoulder, causing fatal electrocution, and then staged the scene as a natural death until chat logs were discovered by family members after the funeral.

Risk Assessment

The case involved severe behavioral risk indicators including secret extradyadic relationships, real-time remote co-offender instruction via electronic messaging, chemical poisoning attempts, lethal physical intervention, and immediate post-incident emotional manipulation and staging.

Key Takeaways

Digital footprints and unencrypted messaging channels often serve as primary forensic evidence in planned domestic crimes. Family vigilance in insisting on post-mortem examinations and preserving electronic evidence proved decisive in uncovering the murder.

AI Case Q&A

What early signals mattered most?

Sushmita's frequent private meetings with her cousin-in-law Rahul Dev and shifting schedule alignment were early indicators of an extramarital relationship.

Which clues helped connect the case?

The critical clue was an unlocked mobile phone left in a shared bathroom after the funeral showing active Instagram chat logs between Sushmita and Rahul Dev.

Which evidence types appeared strongest?

The strongest evidence types include saved Instagram live chat logs detailing step-by-step murder instructions, physical burn marks on the victim's shoulder from electrocution, and autopsy findings.

Witness / Eyewitness Statements

The victim's family stated that Sushmita rushed to them in the morning claiming Karan was unresponsive. During the family confrontation recorded on video, Sushmita alleged she had been a victim of domestic violence, though family members pointed out her financial motives and lack of prior complaints.

How did follow-up reports change the understanding?

Follow-up discovery of ninety Instagram chats shifted the case from a suspected natural death or unexplained cardiac event to a premeditated homicidal conspiracy involving poisoning and electrocution.

What remained unclear?

The precise forensic autopsy results regarding the chemical toxicity levels of the sedatives and formal judicial sentencing outcomes for both suspects remain unstated in the source transcript.

← Back to Home