← Back to India casesChandrasen Ramteke Allegedly Murdered by Disha and Asif Aslam, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
Case Summary
According to the Crime Tak video report, Chandrasen Ramteke, 38, was allegedly killed in the Vat area of Nagpur by his wife Disha and her alleged lover Asif Aslam. Chandrasen had been partially paralyzed and largely bedridden after prolonged alcohol-related illness. The report says Disha and Asif allegedly suffocated him with a pillow on July 14 after Chandrasen suspected their affair. The death initially appeared natural because of his paralysis, but a postmortem reportedly indicated suffocation. Police then examined neighborhood accounts, phone records, and location data, and the report says Asif and Disha were taken into custody after questioning.
Basic Information
Country: India
State/Province: Maharashtra, India
City/Region: Nagpur
Incident Type: Murder
Relationship Status: Married
Relationship Duration: Approximately 13 years (marriage)
Affair / New-Partner Context
Recorded context: Affair started / overlapping relationship
Reported initiator: Unclear / not reported
Relationship timing: During marriage or ongoing partnership, before separation
Incident Date: July 14, 2023
Relationship Journey
Relationship Origins:
- Family introduction
Relationship Stages:
- Married Living Together
- Love Marriage
Analysis
Contributing Factors:
- Cheating / Infidelity
- Drugs / Alchohol Use
- Domestic Conflict
- Suspicion of infidelity
Red Flags:
- Discovery of hidden calls or messages
- Deception after incident
- Escalation Pattern / Violence
- Suspects identified
- Secret affair
- High-Conflict Household
Motives:
- Eliminate spouse
- Extramarital relationship
- Fear of exposure
Relationship Outcomes:
- Homicide during marriage
- Arrest made
- Relationship ended
Source Video
Video hosted by YouTube · Viewer discretion advised
People Link Graph
Chandrasen Ramteke Allegedly Murdered by Disha and Asif Aslam, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
Relationship Journey Graph
Origin
- Family introduction
How the relationship or connection began.
Status
- Married
Approximately 13 years (marriage)
Stages
- Married Living Together
- Love Marriage
Important relationship phases recorded for this case.
Warning Signals
- Discovery of hidden calls or messages
- Deception after incident
- Escalation Pattern / Violence
- Suspects identified
- Secret affair
- High-Conflict Household
Reported red flags or early concern points.
Pressure Points
- Cheating / Infidelity
- Drugs / Alchohol Use
- Domestic Conflict
- Suspicion of infidelity
- Eliminate spouse
- Extramarital relationship
- Fear of exposure
Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.
Incident
2023-07-14
Outcome
- Homicide during marriage
- Arrest made
- Relationship ended
Recorded relationship or case outcome.
AI Intelligence Assessment
Relationship Pattern
Infidelity
Pattern Analysis
The reported pathway involved a long-term marriage affected by Chandrasen's alcohol-related illness, job loss, paralysis, and recurring domestic conflict. Disha reportedly developed an overlapping affair with Asif while remaining married, and Chandrasen's suspicion and confrontation intensified the conflict. The report alleges that Disha and Asif chose homicide rather than separation and attempted to make the death appear natural.
Investigative Notes
The report says the death initially appeared natural because Chandrasen was paralyzed and seriously ill. A postmortem reportedly found signs consistent with suffocation or strangulation by pressure from a pillow. Police reportedly questioned neighbors, reviewed Disha's phone activity and location, identified a recent call to Asif, and found that Asif's second-last location was near the home. The report says Asif initially denied being present and later admitted involvement, while Disha also reportedly acknowledged planning the killing. The source says both were taken into custody, but it does not provide formal charge details, a court outcome, or a conviction.
Investigation Confusion
The initial explanation was a natural death caused by paralysis and deteriorating health. The postmortem reportedly contradicted that assumption, after which neighbor accounts, phone records, location data, and questioning shifted the case toward alleged homicide. The source presents the reported admissions but does not provide independent case documents or a later judicial determination.
Case Reconstruction / Puzzle Pieces
Chandrasen and Disha reportedly had a 13-year love-cum-arranged marriage and three children. After Chandrasen's alcohol-related illness, job loss, paralysis, and prolonged bed rest, Disha operated a water-supply business and later met mechanic Asif through a vehicle repair. Their friendship reportedly became an affair, which Chandrasen suspected after checking Disha's phone and arguing with her. The report alleges that Disha and Asif planned to suffocate Chandrasen while he slept, returned the scene to an apparently ordinary death, and relied on his medical condition to support that appearance. The postmortem, witness accounts, telecommunications data, location information, and reported questioning connected the alleged relationship conflict to the death investigation.
Risk Assessment
Source-reported risks included prolonged alcohol-related deterioration, disability and dependency, financial and caregiving strain, marital arguments, suspected infidelity, concealed communications, and alleged planning to disguise a homicide. These factors indicate a reported escalation from relationship conflict to lethal violence, but the source does not independently establish every allegation or the final legal outcome.
Key Takeaways
The source describes a reported combination of disability-related dependency, alcohol-related illness, caregiving and financial pressure, suspected infidelity, escalating arguments, and concealment. The most important investigative turning point was the postmortem finding that challenged the natural-death explanation. The case also illustrates the source-reported risk of escalation when an overlapping relationship is concealed within a high-conflict marriage.
AI Case Q&A
What early signals mattered most?
The reported early signals were recurring arguments about alcohol use and later arguments about suspected infidelity. Chandrasen reportedly checked Disha's phone, while Disha and Asif maintained regular contact and Asif increasingly visited the home. The source also describes a high-conflict household involving illness, disability, caregiving, and emotional strain.
Which clues helped connect the case?
The reported clues included the postmortem findings, neighbors' accounts about Disha's arrival and conduct, Disha's phone location during the relevant period, her last call to Asif, and Asif's second-last location near the home. The report also says Asif's initial denial changed during questioning.
Which evidence types appeared strongest?
The strongest reported evidence types were the postmortem examination, mobile-phone call records, location data, neighborhood accounts, and the alleged statements made during police questioning. The source does not provide forensic reports, photographs, court filings, or independently verified transcripts of the alleged admissions.
Witness / Eyewitness Statements
The maid reportedly arrived around 3:00 PM, found Chandrasen unresponsive, gathered neighbors, and notified Disha. Neighbors reportedly described Disha as arriving late or returning after the death, which contributed to police suspicion. The source does not provide verbatim witness quotations.
How did follow-up reports change the understanding?
The understanding reportedly changed from a presumed natural death to suspected homicide after the postmortem identified suffocation or strangulation. Subsequent phone and location checks reportedly connected Disha and Asif to the home, and questioning allegedly produced admissions. No later court or appellate developments are provided.
What remained unclear?
The source does not provide the exact year of the July 14 incident, formal charges, the complete forensic report, the precise legal status of either accused person, or a conviction. It also does not independently verify the alleged domestic violence claims or establish the full sequence of events inside the home.