According to the source, former Miss Meerut Priyanka Singh and her close friend Anju were involved in a romantic relationship while Priyanka was married to Anju's brother, Ajendra Singh. The report alleges that conflict over family opposition, property transferred to Priyanka's brother Gaurav, financial hardship, and the women's desire to continue living together led to a planned confrontation at Priyanka's family home in 2008. Priyanka allegedly strangled her mother while Anju restrained her, and Priyanka then allegedly stabbed her father. The deaths were initially made to resemble a robbery. Police reportedly connected the women through neighborhood inquiries, call tracing, fingerprints, and other evidence. Both were arrested, and a lower court sentenced them to life imprisonment in 2015, although later claims of custodial coercion and plans for appeals were reported.
Country: India
State/Province: Uttar Pradesh, India
City/Region: Meerut
Incident Type: Family Homicide
Relationship Status: Love triangle
Relationship Duration: Approximately 2 years (Priyanka and Anju relationship, based on reported 2006 meeting and 2008 incid
Recorded context: Affair started / overlapping relationship
Reported initiator: Both
Relationship timing: During marriage or ongoing partnership, before separation
Incident Date: Nov. 24, 2008
Primary reported outcome: Homicide
Reported self-harm outcome: No suicide or attempt reported
Reported sequence: Order not reported / unclear
Additional victims reported: 1
Additional victim events:
Relationship Origins:
Relationship Stages:
Contributing Factors:
Red Flags:
Motives:
Relationship Outcomes:
Video hosted by YouTube · Viewer discretion advised
How the relationship or connection began.
Approximately 2 years (Priyanka and Anju relationship, based on reported 2006 meeting and 2008 incid
Important relationship phases recorded for this case.
Reported red flags or early concern points.
Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.
2008-11-24
Recorded relationship or case outcome.
Romantic Triangle
The reported conflict involved a concealed romantic relationship between Priyanka and Anju overlapping with Priyanka's court marriage to Anju's brother, Ajendra. The source links the escalation to family opposition, alleged emotional influence, property resentment, financial hardship, and a plan to preserve the Priyanka-Anju relationship. The reported homicide involved Priyanka's parents, who were portrayed as obstacles to the relationship and as holders of property transferred to Gaurav.
Police reportedly found that the apparent robbery scene showed no forced entry, the lock had been opened with a key, and a household dog had not barked. Neighborhood inquiries, call tracing, fingerprints, and other forensic evidence reportedly connected Priyanka and Anju to the deaths. Both were arrested and sent to jail. The source reports that a lower court sentenced both to life imprisonment in 2015 after approximately seven years of proceedings. It also reports that the women later claimed they had been beaten in custody and forced to confess, and that their lawyers considered High Court and Supreme Court proceedings. The report does not establish the final appellate outcome.
The case was initially viewed publicly as a robbery because cash, clothing, and other items were scattered. Police reportedly questioned that theory because there was no forced entry, the lock had been opened with a key, and the dog did not react. Later, the accused reportedly disputed their confessions and alleged custodial violence, creating an unresolved conflict between the reported confession and forensic case narrative and the later coercion claims.
The source places Priyanka's meeting with Anju in Delhi in 2006, followed by a reported romantic relationship. Anju allegedly proposed that Priyanka marry Anju's brother Ajendra so the two women could continue their relationship while living together. After Priyanka's parents transferred property to Gaurav and the women reportedly faced financial hardship, the source says they planned to confront Priyanka's parents. Priyanka allegedly strangled her mother while Anju restrained her, and Priyanka allegedly stabbed her father after he discovered the scene. The pair reportedly staged a robbery, left the house, and were later identified through investigative evidence.
The source describes a high-risk combination of concealed relationship conflict, family estrangement, alleged coercive influence, financial stress, property resentment, deception, and escalating violence. The report also contains disputed allegations of abuse and custodial coercion, so psychological or criminal conclusions should remain source-limited.
The source presents concealed overlapping relationships, family estrangement, property resentment, financial dependence, alleged manipulation, and escalating confrontation as important warning themes. The strongest investigative indicators reportedly included the lack of forced entry, use of a key, the dog's lack of reaction, call tracing, fingerprints, and neighborhood information. Because the report contains allegations, editorial interpretations, and later claims of coercion, it should be used for pattern comparison rather than as an unqualified account of motive or guilt.
The source highlights Priyanka and Anju's unusually close and concealed relationship, Priyanka's reported marriage to Anju's brother as a cover arrangement, growing family estrangement, property resentment, financial hardship, and repeated allegations against relatives. The report also describes escalating arguments and alleged emotional influence by Anju.
The reported lack of forced entry, the use of a key, the household dog's failure to bark, neighborhood knowledge of the relationship, call tracing, fingerprints, and other forensic comparisons reportedly helped connect the case to Priyanka and Anju.
According to the source, the strongest reported evidence included the condition of the locks and scene, fingerprint comparisons, call-tracing information, forensic evidence, the recovered or displayed property and robbery indicators, and reported confessions. The later claims that the confessions were coerced remained disputed.
The source says neighbors reported that the dog did not bark during the night and that the apparent scene did not resemble forced entry. Priyanka's aunt reportedly discovered the bodies and called police. The report also describes statements attributed to Priyanka and Anju during media or police interactions, but does not provide independently verified eyewitness accounts of the killings.
Early public understanding reportedly centered on a robbery. Follow-up police work shifted attention toward a known person because the lock was opened with a key, there was no forced entry, and the dog did not bark. Later court proceedings resulted in reported life sentences in 2015, while subsequent claims of custodial coercion and possible appeals complicated the account. The final appellate outcome is not available in the source.
The source does not provide the victims' names, exact incident date, exact scene address, ages, or a final appellate disposition. The truth of Priyanka's and Anju's allegations of family abuse and custodial violence is unclear from this report. The report also uses strong editorial language and does not independently establish the alleged psychological influence or the precise division of responsibility.