RelationWatch
← Back to India cases
OSINT Case File

Baljinder Kaur Allegedly Murdered by Gomit Rathi and Pankaj, Yamunanagar, Haryana, India

Case Summary

Baljinder Kaur, the wife of the sarpanch of Shyampur village in Yamunanagar, was found with her face submerged in a water tank on December 24. The death was initially treated as a possible accidental drowning, but her husband and family suspected murder. Police investigation using mobile-location data, call details, and other technical evidence reportedly established that her son, Gomit Rathi, had secretly flown from England to India, hidden in an animal enclosure near the family home, attacked and strangled her, and placed her body in the tank to make the death appear accidental. Police said Gomit acted after disputes involving his proposed marriage to a local woman and demands for money. His friend Pankaj was also arrested for allegedly concealing his arrival and helping with accommodation, food, and post-incident arrangements.

Basic Information

Country: India

State/Province: Haryana, India

City/Region: Yamunanagar

Incident Type: Family Homicide

Relationship Status: Unknown

Relationship Duration:

Incident Date: Dec. 24, 2025

Incident Sequence and Additional Victims

Primary reported outcome: Homicide

Reported self-harm outcome: No suicide or attempt reported

Reported sequence: Order not reported / unclear

Additional victims reported: 0

Relationship Journey

Relationship Origins:

  • Family introduction

Relationship Stages:

  • No data available.

Analysis

Contributing Factors:

  • Financial Issues
  • Domestic Conflict
  • Family pressure
  • Interfaith/intercaste conflict

Red Flags:

  • Secretive communication patterns
  • Meeting people privately / hiddenly
  • Deception after incident
  • Escalation Pattern / Violence
  • Suspects identified
  • High-Conflict Household

Motives:

  • Money / Financial Gain
  • Revenge
  • Forced marriage conflict

Relationship Outcomes:

  • Legal case ongoing
  • Homicide during marriage
  • Arrest made
  • Investigation still ongoing
  • Deadbody recovery
Primary source video

Source Video

Crime Tak - India

Baljinder Kaur Allegedly Murdered by Gomit Rathi and Pankaj, Yamunanagar, Haryana, India

Watch on YouTube ↗
Verified True
Confidence 3
Incident Date Dec. 24, 2025
Incident Type Family Homicide

Video hosted by YouTube · Viewer discretion advised

People Link Graph

Baljinder Kaur Allegedly Murdered by Gomit Rathi and Pankaj, Yamunanagar, Haryana, India

Relationship Journey Graph

1

Origin

  • Family introduction

How the relationship or connection began.

2

Status

  • Unknown
3

Stages

Important relationship phases recorded for this case.

4

Warning Signals

  • Secretive communication patterns
  • Meeting people privately / hiddenly
  • Deception after incident
  • Escalation Pattern / Violence
  • Suspects identified
  • High-Conflict Household

Reported red flags or early concern points.

5

Pressure Points

  • Financial Issues
  • Domestic Conflict
  • Family pressure
  • Interfaith/intercaste conflict
  • Money / Financial Gain
  • Revenge
  • Forced marriage conflict

Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.

6

Incident

2025-12-24

7

Outcome

  • Legal case ongoing
  • Homicide during marriage
  • Arrest made
  • Investigation still ongoing
  • Deadbody recovery

Recorded relationship or case outcome.

AI Intelligence Assessment

Relationship Pattern

Family Opposition

Pattern Analysis

The reported conflict centered on a mother-son relationship marked by repeated arguments over a proposed marriage and financial demands. Police attributed the alleged homicide to accumulated resentment, perceived family obstruction, and financial conflict. The reported return from England, concealment, waiting in the animal enclosure, physical attack, and attempted staging of an accidental drowning indicate a planned escalation, although the allegations remained subject to investigation and legal proceedings.

Investigative Notes

Police initially registered the matter under Section 174 as a suspected accidental death. After Baljinder Kaur’s husband and family reported that the death appeared suspicious, CIA-2 reportedly used traditional and scientific investigation, mobile-location data, call details, and other technical evidence. Police alleged that Gomit was in India despite being believed to be in England, arrested him, questioned him, and obtained a four-day police remand. Pankaj was also arrested. Police said the weapon, mobile phone, passport, length of concealment, and possible drug involvement remained under investigation. The source does not report a conviction or final court outcome.

Investigation Confusion

The death initially appeared to be an accidental drowning because Baljinder’s face was found submerged in a water tank. Family suspicion redirected the investigation toward murder. The unexpected finding that Gomit, believed to be in England, was physically present in India created the key investigative contradiction. Police statements about the exact motive, weapon, and possible drug involvement were preliminary and not fully verified.

Case Reconstruction / Puzzle Pieces

Baljinder Kaur was found dead on December 24 near the family’s animal enclosure, with her face submerged in a water tank. Her husband and family reportedly rejected the accidental-death explanation, prompting a murder investigation. Police traced family phone numbers and technical data and reportedly found that Gomit Rathi had secretly returned from England on December 18. The source says Gomit had ongoing conflict with his mother over a proposed marriage and money, told friend Pankaj to keep his arrival secret, hid near the home, attacked and strangled Baljinder, and placed her body in the tank. Police then arrested Gomit and Pankaj, while further evidence and the full legal outcome remained unresolved.

Risk Assessment

The source describes a high-risk family conflict involving persistent resentment, secrecy, financial disputes, opposition to a proposed marriage, deliberate travel, concealment near the home, and a physical attack. The reported planning and use of the water tank to suggest accidental drowning increased investigative complexity. The source does not provide a documented history of prior physical violence or a professional mental-health assessment.

Key Takeaways

The case illustrates how family opposition to a relationship and financial disputes can combine with secrecy and accumulated resentment. The most significant reported warning indicators were concealed travel, assistance from a trusted friend, deliberate waiting near the home, and an attempt to make a homicide appear accidental. The family’s early challenge to the accidental-death theory and the phone-location contradiction were central to the reported investigative breakthrough.

AI Case Q&A

What early signals mattered most?

The source reports repeated mother-son conflict, opposition to Gomit’s proposed marriage, disputes over money, resentment about spending restrictions, and secret communication with Pankaj about returning to India. His concealed travel and decision to hide near the family home were especially significant reported escalation indicators.

Which clues helped connect the case?

The reported clues included the family’s suspicion that the death was not accidental, mobile-location data showing Gomit in India rather than England, call-detail analysis, his undisclosed return on December 18, and Pankaj’s reported knowledge of the travel and accommodation arrangements.

Which evidence types appeared strongest?

According to the source, the strongest reported evidence types were mobile-location records, call details, broader technical evidence, postmortem examination, the recovered body, and Gomit’s reported admission during preliminary police questioning. The source does not provide the contents of forensic reports or a complete evidentiary record.

Witness / Eyewitness Statements

The husband and family reportedly told police they suspected murder rather than accidental drowning. A police official described the investigative findings and preliminary interrogation. No independent eyewitness account of the attack was reported.

How did follow-up reports change the understanding?

Follow-up investigation changed the case from a suspected accidental drowning under Section 174 to a reported family-homicide investigation. Technical tracing reportedly identified Gomit’s presence in India, and police then arrested Gomit and Pankaj. The source says weapon, phone, passport, possible drug involvement, and other details still required investigation.

What remained unclear?

The source leaves the exact incident year, precise time of death, weapon used, complete forensic findings, duration of Gomit’s concealment, details of Pankaj’s alleged participation, whether drugs were involved, and the final court outcome unclear.

Add cases to private folders and export structured data. View plans

← Back to Home