Anil Chaudhary, a brass businessman from Muradabad, was fatally stabbed at home on July 13, 2024. The source reports that his wife, Tanu Chaudhary, allegedly drugged his food, facilitated access to the house, and coordinated with Kanhaiya and two devotees, Mohit and Anmol. The alleged motive involved Tanu's romantic relationship with Kanhaiya, a tantric, and plans for a new life together. Anmol reportedly suffered a fatal knife injury during the attack, while Tanu later allegedly confessed during police questioning. Further investigation was reported as ongoing.
Country: India
State/Province: Uttar Pradesh, India
City/Region: Muradabad
Incident Type: Domestic Violence Homicide
Relationship Status: Married
Relationship Duration: Approximately 15 years (marriage)
Recorded context: Desire to replace or leave current partner
Reported initiator: Alleged suspect / offender
Relationship timing: During marriage or ongoing partnership, before separation
Incident Date: July 13, 2024
Relationship Origins:
Relationship Stages:
Contributing Factors:
Red Flags:
Motives:
Relationship Outcomes:
Video hosted by YouTube · Viewer discretion advised
How the relationship or connection began.
Approximately 15 years (marriage)
Important relationship phases recorded for this case.
Reported red flags or early concern points.
Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.
2024-07-13
Recorded relationship or case outcome.
Infidelity
The source presents a marital homicide allegedly connected to an overlapping romantic relationship between Tanu and Kanhaiya. The reported pathway included concealment, introduction of Kanhaiya as a brother, coordination with his devotees, and an alleged plan to remove Anil so Tanu and Kanhaiya could begin a new life. Son preference and reported financial expectations were additional contextual factors.
Police reportedly examined the crime scene, sent Anil's body for postmortem, tested blood samples, questioned family members and neighbors, reviewed Tanu's background and social-media accounts, and investigated Kanhaiya, Mohit, and Anmol. Blood found from the room to the courtyard reportedly did not match Anil's blood, and Anmol was found dead approximately 72 hours later near the scene. The source reports that Tanu broke down and confessed during questioning, but it does not provide complete charging, trial, or conviction details. Further investigation was reportedly ongoing to determine whether additional people were involved.
The investigation was initially complicated by conflicting accounts about Kanhaiya, the daughter's identification of Mohit and Anmol, Tanu's denial of knowing Kanhaiya, and blood at the scene that reportedly did not match Anil. Anmol's later death created additional uncertainty about the identity and movements of the alleged attackers. The source also alternates between the names Amod and Anmol in the early account.
According to the source, Anil and Tanu had been married for approximately 15 years and had two daughters. Tanu reportedly sought help from religious figures to have a son and later developed a close relationship with Kanhaiya, a tantric. After Anil allegedly learned of their closeness and warned Tanu to stop contact, the source says Kanhaiya enlisted Mohit and Anmol, while Tanu allegedly drugged Anil's food, left access open, and enabled the nighttime attack. Manvi's account, blood evidence, social-media material, neighborhood information, and Tanu's reported confession were presented as the main links connecting the relationship, planning, and homicide.
The reported risk pattern includes concealed romantic attachment, deception about a third party, escalating marital conflict, alleged drugging, coordinated access to the home, and deliberate use of knives. The account indicates severe lethal risk within an ongoing marriage, but the source's descriptions and allegations should be distinguished from independently verified court findings.
The source highlights concealed third-party involvement, a partner being presented under a false family role, secret communications, and escalating relationship conflict as significant warning indicators. It also shows how crime-scene blood evidence, witness accounts, social-media records, and later suspect movements can connect a domestic homicide investigation. The account remains source-limited and should not be treated as a substitute for verified judicial records.
The most significant reported signals were Tanu's increasing closeness with Kanhaiya, private communication, her alleged presentation of him as a brother, Anil's warning against further contact, and the reported plan to begin a new life together.
The reported clues included Manvi's identification of Mohit and Anmol, her reference to Kanhaiya's house, neighbors' accounts about Kanhaiya, social-media reels showing Tanu and Kanhaiya together, the blood mismatch, and Tanu's reported statement during questioning.
The source describes witness testimony, postmortem findings, blood samples from the home and courtyard, social-media records, neighborhood information, and an alleged confession as important evidence types. The source does not provide laboratory reports, forensic details, or court-tested evidence documentation.
Manvi reportedly said that two men stabbed her father, that she heard him crying and calling out, and that she woke Tanu before the men fled. Neighbors reportedly said that Kanhaiya frequently visited Tanu and was introduced as her brother. Police questioning and observations about Tanu's nervousness were also described, but no independent eyewitness account of the stabbing was reported.
Follow-up investigation reportedly shifted attention from unknown attackers to Tanu's relationship with Kanhaiya after the blood mismatch, Anmol's death, neighborhood information, social-media material, and Tanu's reported confession. The source says police continued investigating possible additional participants.
The source does not fully resolve the legal status of each suspect, the exact roles of Kanhaiya and Mohit in the attack, the identity discrepancy between Amod and Anmol, the complete forensic meaning of the blood evidence, or whether additional people were involved.