← Back to India casesUnnamed woman Disappearance Involving Narasimha Murthy, Deepak C, and others, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
Case Summary
On February 12, 2013, an unnamed homemaker and mother of a young child left her home in Sanjay Nagar, Bengaluru, and disappeared. Her decomposed body was found three days later in a eucalyptus forest approximately 20 kilometers away. Local police initially arrested her husband for lack of other suspects, but he was released on bail after about six months and later obtained a court-ordered transfer of the investigation to the Bengaluru Police CID. A senior officer noticed that bank manager Narasimha Murthy had sent 11 closely timed text messages to his friend Deepak C on the incident date. A reported brain-mapping examination and subsequent questioning connected the messages to disposal of the body. The source reports that Narasimha Murthy, Deepak C, and Hari Prasad were arrested; it alleges that Deepak and Hari Prasad raped and murdered the woman, while Narasimha Murthy lured her to a club and later participated in disposing of the body. The source also reports blood-group consistency between stains from the woman's clothing and an Alto car seat, while noting that DNA confirmation was still anticipated.
Basic Information
Country: India
State/Province: Karnataka, India
City/Region: Bengaluru
Incident Type: Murder
Relationship Status: Married
Relationship Duration:
Incident Date: Feb. 12, 2013
Relationship Journey
Relationship Origins:
- Family introduction
- Arranged marriage
Relationship Stages:
- Married Living Together
Analysis
Contributing Factors:
- Custody Dispute
Red Flags:
- Secretive communication patterns
- Suspects identified
Motives:
- No data available.
Relationship Outcomes:
- Legal case ongoing
- Arrest made
- Investigation still ongoing
- Deadbody recovery
Source Video
Video hosted by YouTube · Viewer discretion advised
People Link Graph
Unnamed woman Disappearance Involving Narasimha Murthy, Deepak C, and others, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
Relationship Journey Graph
Origin
- Family introduction
- Arranged marriage
How the relationship or connection began.
Status
- Married
Stages
- Married Living Together
Important relationship phases recorded for this case.
Warning Signals
- Secretive communication patterns
- Suspects identified
Reported red flags or early concern points.
Pressure Points
- Custody Dispute
Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.
Incident
2013-02-12
Outcome
- Legal case ongoing
- Arrest made
- Investigation still ongoing
- Deadbody recovery
Recorded relationship or case outcome.
AI Intelligence Assessment
Relationship Pattern
Unknown
Pattern Analysis
The source describes a homicide and sexual assault involving a victim's distant relative, the victim's husband's bank manager, and two of that man's friends. Although the case includes family and workplace connections, the reported central pathway is alleged luring, sexual violence, homicide, and body disposal rather than a spouse-centered relationship conflict. The account contains a disputed or internally inconsistent allocation of Narasimha Murthy's alleged role: it attributes luring and disposal assistance to him but says he did not participate in the rape or killing.
Investigative Notes
Local police initially focused on the victim's husband and arrested him, but he obtained bail after approximately six months because the source says there was no concrete evidence. He petitioned the High Court for a CID investigation, which was granted. CID inspector Narendra Babu reviewed the case, revisited the body-disposal location, examined vehicle access and call records, and identified Narasimha Murthy as a person of interest. A senior officer noticed 11 closely timed SMS messages from Narasimha Murthy to Deepak C on February 12, 2013. Deepak was questioned, underwent a reported brain-mapping examination, and later allegedly confessed that the messages concerned disposal of the body. Hari Prasad was subsequently questioned and arrested. The source reports arrests and registration of a case against Narasimha Murthy, Deepak C, and Hari Prasad. It reports blood-group consistency between stains from the victim's clothing and stains found in an Alto car seat, while stating that DNA examination was expected to provide further confirmation. No conviction or final court outcome is reported.
Investigation Confusion
The investigation initially treated the husband as the main suspect because the victim had limited outside social contact. Later, the husband sought a CID inquiry, raising initial suspicion that he might be attempting to redirect the investigation. The case was nearly closed after CID found no clear lead in Narasimha Murthy's phone records, until a senior officer noticed the 11 SMS messages. The source also gives an internally inconsistent account of Narasimha Murthy's role, alleging that he lured the victim and helped with disposal while stating that he was not involved in the rape or murder. The reported blood evidence was based on blood group rather than completed DNA confirmation.
Case Reconstruction / Puzzle Pieces
The reported timeline begins with the victim leaving her Sanjay Nagar home on February 12, 2013, followed by recovery of her body three days later in a eucalyptus forest approximately 20 kilometers away. The dump location suggested that the killing occurred elsewhere and that a vehicle had been used. CID investigation identified Narasimha Murthy through his relationship to the victim, his position as the husband's bank manager, possible access to an Alto, and his communications with Deepak C. Review of the 11 SMS messages, followed by questioning and a reported brain-mapping examination of Deepak, connected Deepak and Hari Prasad to the alleged disposal. The source then linked the Alto and a Swift to body movement and reported blood-group consistency in the Alto. The alleged club sequence, sexual assault, homicide, and later disposal remain source-reported allegations pending the legal outcome described.
Risk Assessment
The source reports severe risk indicators including alleged sexual violence, homicide, coordinated body disposal, deceptive luring, multiple alleged offenders, and delayed detection. The account is based on a narrated crime report and does not independently establish guilt or the final evidentiary status of the case.
Key Takeaways
The case illustrates how an initially narrow domestic suspicion can delay attention to wider social, workplace, and acquaintance networks. The most useful investigative links were the distinction between the body-disposal site and the likely killing site, vehicle ownership, communication metadata, and preserved material from an apparently unchanged car seat. The source also shows the importance of separating reported forensic leads from confirmed DNA findings and separating each suspect's alleged role.
AI Case Q&A
What early signals mattered most?
The most important early signals were that the body appeared to have been moved, the victim had disappeared from her home, and a vehicle was likely required for disposal. Later, Narasimha Murthy's connection to the victim, his role as the husband's bank manager, and the 11 closely timed SMS messages became significant. The source does not report prior threats or domestic violence involving the husband.
Which clues helped connect the case?
The main connecting clues were the location of the body away from the home, vehicle ownership, Narasimha Murthy's call-detail records, the 11 SMS messages to Deepak C, the reported 'Did you throw?' content identified through the brain-mapping episode, statements attributed to Deepak and Hari Prasad, and blood-group consistency between the victim's clothing and an Alto car seat.
Which evidence types appeared strongest?
The source presents the SMS records, the reported brain-mapping results, alleged statements or confessions by Deepak C and Hari Prasad, vehicle links, and blood stains from the Alto seat as important evidence types. It says the Swift had no surviving physical evidence after years of use and cleaning. DNA testing was described as pending or needed for stronger confirmation.
Witness / Eyewitness Statements
No independent eyewitness account of the killing is reported. The source attributes information about the alleged club sequence, vehicle use, and body disposal to questioning of Deepak C and Hari Prasad. Police and senior officers reportedly identified investigative leads through case-file review, scene examination, call records, and vehicle evidence.
How did follow-up reports change the understanding?
Follow-up CID investigation changed the focus from the husband to Narasimha Murthy, Deepak C, and Hari Prasad. The senior officer's review of the CDR prevented the case from being closed and led to renewed questioning of Deepak. Later reports in the source added the alleged club sequence, the use of two vehicles, arrests, and blood-group findings. No later court disposition or completed DNA result is provided.
What remained unclear?
The victim's name, the exact cause and manner of death, the precise roles of all three accused, the exact sequence at the club, the reason for the alleged attack, the full contents and timing of the 11 messages, and the final DNA result remain unclear or incompletely reported. The source does not report a conviction or final judicial finding.