According to the report, Vikram Chauhan, an infrastructure-company executive, was married to Deepika, a bank manager, and they had two young children. Vikram developed an extramarital relationship with neighbor Sefali Basin Tiwari, a journalist who was also married. After Sefali divorced her husband and Deepika refused to divorce Vikram, the report alleges repeated domestic violence, planning to kill Deepika during a trip to Nainital, and a later fatal fall from the couple's apartment balcony in Gurugram on October 27, 2018. The report says forensic findings, electronic messages, and witness accounts led to Vikram's arrest, while Sefali was also arrested in the alleged planning and later released on bail. The case was described as pending in court.
Country: India
State/Province: Haryana, India
City/Region: Gurugram
Incident Type: Domestic Violence Homicide
Relationship Status: Extramarital relationship
Relationship Duration: Approximately 3 years (affair)
Recorded context: Affair started / overlapping relationship
Reported initiator: Unclear / not reported
Relationship timing: During marriage or ongoing partnership, before separation
Incident Date: Oct. 27, 2018
Relationship Origins:
Relationship Stages:
Contributing Factors:
Red Flags:
Motives:
Relationship Outcomes:
Video hosted by YouTube · Viewer discretion advised
How the relationship or connection began.
Approximately 3 years (affair)
Important relationship phases recorded for this case.
Reported red flags or early concern points.
Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.
2018-10-27
Recorded relationship or case outcome.
Infidelity
The reported pathway began with a property transaction and neighbor relationship, then developed into a concealed extramarital affair between Vikram and Sefali. Conflict intensified after Sefali divorced her husband while Deepika refused to divorce Vikram. The source alleges that repeated violence, secret planning, electronic communications, and an attempt to disguise the death as suicide preceded the fatal balcony fall.
The report says Deepika's death initially appeared possibly consistent with suicide. It describes nail marks on her neck, skin reportedly found under Vikram's fingernails, electronic messages and email, alleged prior planning for a push in Nainital, and witness accounts from the residential society. Vikram was reportedly arrested two days after the death. Sefali was also arrested in connection with alleged murder planning and was later released on bail after the report said she was six months pregnant. The report states that Vikram remained under trial, the case was pending in court, and Vikram's brother was suspected and reportedly absconding. These details are source claims and should not be treated as final findings of guilt.
Police initially considered suicide because Deepika fell from a high-floor balcony and broken flower pots allegedly made the scene appear staged as a jump. The source also says nearby residents did not initially disclose what they had seen, while later reports attributed eyewitness observations to multiple society residents. The precise role of Vikram's brother remained unresolved, and the report contains some inconsistent name spellings and unverified media claims.
The reported case began when Vikram and Deepika searched for a home in Gurugram and purchased a flat from Sefali and her husband in 2015. By 2018, Vikram and Sefali were reportedly spending increasing private time together and described themselves as in love. Sefali divorced her husband, but Deepika refused Vikram's requested divorce, after which the source alleges repeated beatings and planning to remove Deepika. The report links an April 2018 Ladakh trip, a proposed Nainital plan, messages and email, the October 27 balcony incident, forensic findings, and witness accounts to the subsequent arrests and ongoing court case.
The source describes a high-risk escalation involving an overlapping affair, pressure for divorce, repeated alleged physical abuse, threats, attempted concealment, and reported advance planning. These factors indicate severe relationship violence risk, although the report contains allegations and media claims that require court and investigative verification.
The source highlights how a property-based neighbor relationship reportedly developed into an extramarital affair and then escalated after an attempted separation. Important warning indicators included secrecy, a new romantic attachment, pressure for divorce, repeated alleged violence, threats, travel-based planning, and attempts to create a suicide explanation. The children, the disputed witness accounts, forensic findings, electronic communications, and unresolved allegations involving Vikram's brother are significant for historical comparison.
The reported early signals were Vikram and Sefali spending frequent private time together, regular evening walks, coffee-shop meetings, concealed romantic involvement, and their plans to leave their spouses. The source also alleges that Vikram repeatedly beat Deepika after she refused to divorce him.
The report identifies the alleged Ladakh planning, the proposed Nainital incident, the messages and email exchanged between Vikram and Sefali, the 9:37 message about throwing Deepika from the balcony, forensic findings on Deepika's neck and Vikram's hands, and later society witness accounts as key connecting clues.
The source presents the strongest reported evidence as forensic findings, electronic messages and email, alleged photographs from the Ladakh trip, the damaged flower pots, witness accounts, and statements attributed to the children. The evidentiary strength and admissibility of these materials were not independently verified in the supplied report.
The report says some society residents later claimed they saw Vikram throw Deepika from the balcony and heard her plead that she loved her children and should not be killed. It also says the children reportedly described their father beating their mother. The source does not provide verified names or verbatim statements from these witnesses.
Initial impressions reportedly treated the death as a possible suicide. Follow-up examination and reporting shifted attention toward homicide after forensic findings, electronic communications, alleged prior planning, and reported witness accounts. Later updates described arrests, Sefali's bail, Vikram's ongoing trial, and an unresolved investigation into Vikram's brother.
The supplied report does not establish final court findings, the complete forensic record, the precise number and reliability of eyewitnesses, or the confirmed legal status of Vikram's brother. It also leaves unclear the exact sequence and legal significance of the Nainital allegations and whether all reported messages and photographs were authenticated.