According to the video report, 22-year-old engineering student Naveen was allegedly lured from his hostel to Hyderabad by his childhood friend Har Har Krishna on February 17, 2023, and murdered. The report says Krishna had become involved with Naveen's former girlfriend, Nandini, after allegedly manipulating her into ending her relationship with Naveen. Krishna allegedly planned the killing with Nandini's involvement, used a rope and knife, burned Naveen's body, and sought money to leave the city. Police reportedly arrested Krishna, Nandini, and Krishna's friend Hasan after Krishna surrendered.
Country: India
State/Province: Telangana, India
City/Region: Hyderabad
Incident Type: Murder
Relationship Status: Love triangle
Relationship Duration:
Recorded context: Romantic-rival / love-triangle context
Reported initiator: Alleged suspect / offender
Relationship timing: During marriage or ongoing partnership, before separation
Incident Date: Feb. 17, 2023
Primary reported outcome: Homicide
Reported self-harm outcome: No suicide or attempt reported
Reported sequence: Order not reported / unclear
Additional victims reported: 0
Relationship Origins:
Relationship Stages:
Contributing Factors:
Red Flags:
Motives:
Relationship Outcomes:
Video hosted by YouTube · Viewer discretion advised
How the relationship or connection began.
Important relationship phases recorded for this case.
Reported red flags or early concern points.
Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.
2023-02-17
Recorded relationship or case outcome.
Romantic Triangle
The reported conflict centered on a childhood friendship, a romantic relationship between Naveen and Nandini, and Krishna's later attachment to Nandini. The source alleges that Krishna spread accusations about Naveen, contributed to the breakup, and later feared that Naveen's renewed contact could expose the earlier manipulation or threaten the newer relationship. The reported homicide was preceded by alleged planning, deception, and a deliberate lure.
The video reports that Pradeep alerted Shankar Rai after Naveen failed to return, and that Shankar filed a missing-person report at Narkatpalli Police Station. Police reportedly examined call records, learned that Krishna had disappeared after Naveen, and noted a deposit of ₹1,500,000 into Krishna's account. Krishna allegedly surrendered on February 24, 2023 and confessed during questioning. The report says Krishna, Nandini, and Hasan were arrested and presented in court, but it does not provide reliable charge details, conviction records, forensic findings, or a later case disposition.
The narration contains date and location inconsistencies, including a stated February 18 morning call while the later account places the final call and killing on February 17. It also presents highly graphic confession details and alleged involvement by Nandini and Hasan without independently identified forensic or court documentation. The video is an informational entertainment report that expressly disclaims authentication.
According to the source, Naveen and Nandini began dating after meeting at school, while Krishna was Naveen's trusted childhood friend. Krishna allegedly learned intimate details of the relationship, became attracted to Nandini, and spread accusations that caused her to distance herself from Naveen. After Nandini and Krishna reportedly became partners, Naveen resumed messaging Nandini, which the source says increased Krishna's fear of losing her and of exposure. Krishna allegedly lured Naveen to Hyderabad, prepared rope, gloves, and a knife, killed him near bushes and a public school, burned the body, sought money from Nandini, and later surrendered.
The source describes a high-risk combination of romantic rivalry, alleged deception, repeated unwanted messages, fear of exposure, substance use, weapon preparation, isolation of the victim, and alleged post-incident concealment. These are source-reported risk indicators, not an independent assessment of guilt or future danger.
The source's main relationship-intelligence value lies in the reported progression from trusted friendship to romantic rivalry, alleged manipulation, separation, renewed contact, fear of exposure, and planned violence. Important warning signals included hidden or conflicting relationship dynamics, repeated unwanted messaging, escalating jealousy, preparation of weapons, isolation through a false social invitation, and alleged efforts to conceal the body.
The reported early signals were Krishna's unusual interest in Nandini, alleged accusations against Naveen, Nandini's abrupt withdrawal from Naveen, Krishna's subsequent relationship with Nandini, and later fear surrounding Naveen's renewed messages.
Reportedly important clues included Naveen's last known call with Krishna, Krishna's disappearance after Naveen went missing, call-detail records, the reported ₹1,500,000 deposit, Krishna's surrender, and his alleged confession. The source also mentions preparation of rope, gloves, and a knife.
The video describes call records, bank-transfer information, the missing-person report, Krishna's surrender, and his alleged confession as important evidence types. It does not identify forensic reports, verified photographs, body-recovery records, or authenticated court documents.
Pradeep reportedly told Shankar Rai that Naveen had gone to meet Krishna and had not returned. Shankar reportedly told police that Naveen and Krishna had recently been disputing. The report says Krishna later told Hasan about the killing. No independent eyewitness account of the homicide is reported.
The account moved from a missing-person investigation to suspicion of Krishna after police learned he was also missing, then to an alleged homicide case after Krishna surrendered and reportedly confessed. The video provides no reliable later follow-up on trial, conviction, forensic confirmation, or final sentence.
The exact incident date and sequence are inconsistently narrated. The source does not independently establish the alleged roles of Nandini and Hasan, the status of the body and forensic evidence, the precise legal charges, whether the reported confession was formally admissible, or the final court outcome.