Anna Repkina, a 27-year-old Russian woman, traveled to Oregon after becoming engaged to William Hargrove through an online relationship. The source reports that Hargrove was simultaneously involved with Michelle Chavez, who was married and living with her family. After Chavez pressed Hargrove to choose between the women, Repkina was shot on or about April 16, 2017, and her body was found near a remote logging road outside Corvallis, Oregon, on April 17. Investigators connected Hargrove to the scene through trash, a borrowed shotgun, financial activity, phone and vehicle data, and inconsistent statements. He was convicted in 2019, but the conviction was overturned on appeal in 2023 because of a flawed search warrant and improper evidence collection; the source description states that a new trial was scheduled for April 2025.
Country: United States
State/Province: Oregon, United States
City/Region: Corvallis
Incident Type: Murder
Relationship Status: Love triangle
Relationship Duration: Approximately 1 year (Hargrove-Chavez relationship); approximately 4 months (Hargrove-Repkina relati
Recorded context: Affair started / overlapping relationship
Reported initiator: Alleged suspect / offender
Relationship timing: During marriage or ongoing partnership, before separation
Incident Date: April 16, 2017
Primary reported outcome: Homicide
Reported self-harm outcome: Attempted suicide; survived
Person(s) reported to have died by or attempted suicide: Michelle Chavez
Reported role: Another person
Reported sequence: Homicide or serious injury, then suicide or attempt
Additional victims reported: 0
Relationship Origins:
Relationship Stages:
Contributing Factors:
Red Flags:
Motives:
Relationship Outcomes:
Video hosted by YouTube · Viewer discretion advised
How the relationship or connection began.
Approximately 1 year (Hargrove-Chavez relationship); approximately 4 months (Hargrove-Repkina relati
Important relationship phases recorded for this case.
Reported red flags or early concern points.
Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.
2017-04-16
Recorded relationship or case outcome.
Romantic Triangle
The reported conflict centered on an overlapping romantic triangle involving Hargrove, his fiancée Repkina, and Chavez, who was married while living with Hargrove as a renter and romantic partner. Hargrove reportedly concealed the overlap, repurposed Chavez's wedding ring as Repkina's engagement ring, and moved between the two relationships. Chavez's reported ultimatum and the approaching April 19 deadline preceded the homicide, although the source does not establish that Chavez caused or participated in the killing.
A caretaker walking a dog found Repkina's body near a remote logging road on April 17, 2017. Investigators examined a KFC receipt and other trash, traced a purchase to Kevin Thomas, learned that Hargrove had borrowed Thomas's shotgun, recovered the shotgun from Hargrove's vehicle, and reported finding Hargrove's fingerprint on it. Investigators also used security-camera footage, vehicle tracking, phone GPS data placing Hargrove near the murder site, bank withdrawals from Repkina's account, and inconsistent statements by Hargrove and Chavez. Hargrove was arrested, indicted in 2018, convicted in 2019, and sentenced in 2020 to life with possible parole after 25 years. The source description reports that the conviction was overturned on appeal in 2023 because of a flawed search warrant and improper evidence collection, with a new trial scheduled for April 2025. Chavez was questioned but was not reported as charged.
The investigation considered whether Chavez, rather than Hargrove, could have been the shooter because of her reported ultimatum, prior visit to the logging road, and possession of Repkina's phone. The defense reportedly argued that Chavez shot Repkina, while investigators reported no forensic evidence placing Chavez at the scene and reported Hargrove's fingerprint on the shotgun. Hargrove and Chavez initially gave accounts that investigators said were false or inconsistent. The later appellate reversal created an additional legal uncertainty about the admissibility of evidence and the validity of the original conviction.
Repkina met Hargrove online and traveled from Russia to Oregon, where they became engaged and planned a wedding. Hargrove was simultaneously involved with Chavez, who was married and reportedly expected him to end his relationship with Repkina by April 19. On April 15, Hargrove allegedly promised Chavez that the situation would be permanently fixed by the following evening. On April 16, he met Chavez after claiming that Repkina had left, withdrew money from Repkina's account, and later appeared at or near the remote location where Repkina was found dead. The case was connected through trash, the KFC receipt, the borrowed shotgun, fingerprint evidence, vehicle and phone data, financial activity, and interview inconsistencies, but the original conviction was later overturned on appeal.
The source describes a high-risk combination of concealed overlapping relationships, deception, escalating pressure to choose, repeated conflict, access to a borrowed shotgun, and post-incident concealment or inconsistent accounts. Repkina was reportedly isolated from the full relationship context and dependent on Hargrove for local support after moving from Russia. The source reports a homicide conviction but also a later appellate reversal based on warrant and evidence-collection problems, so criminal responsibility remains subject to the reported new trial status.
The case illustrates how concealed overlapping relationships, deceptive identity presentation, relationship ultimatums, and access to a weapon can converge into serious risk. Repkina reportedly noticed unexplained absences and had to contact Hargrove's friends to locate him, but she did not know the full extent of the triangle. Investigatively, ordinary discarded items, digital communications, financial records, location data, and weapon ownership links were significant. The appellate reversal demonstrates that strong investigative leads do not eliminate the need for legally valid searches and properly collected evidence.
The most important reported early signals were Hargrove's concealed overlapping relationships, his repeated movement between Chavez's home and Repkina's apartment, Repkina's growing suspicion about his absences, the repurposed wedding ring, and Chavez's escalating pressure for Hargrove to choose. The source also describes extensive secret communication and a deadline for Hargrove to resolve the situation.
The reported clues included the KFC receipt and trash near the body, the connection to Kevin Thomas, Hargrove's unreturned shotgun, his fingerprint on the weapon, bank withdrawals from Repkina's account, security-camera footage, vehicle tracking, phone GPS data, and inconsistent accounts during questioning. Hargrove's time-travel searches and messages about correcting a horrible mistake were also reported as post-incident behavior.
The source presents the shotgun and fingerprint evidence, phone-location data, vehicle and security-camera tracking, financial records, fast-food receipts, text messages, and interview statements as important evidence types. Their legal status was later complicated by the reported appellate finding that a search warrant was flawed and some evidence was improperly collected.
A caretaker reportedly found the body while walking a dog. Kevin Thomas reportedly told police that Hargrove had borrowed his shotgun and had not returned it. Michelle Chavez described her relationship with Hargrove, the ultimatum, their meeting on Easter Sunday, and her later suicide attempt. Friends Joseph Thompson and Jamie described Hargrove's personality and relationships. Prosecutors and detectives described the scene, digital evidence, and interviews.
Follow-up reporting changed the case from an initial investigation involving a suspected love-triangle motive to a prosecution focused on Hargrove's alleged movements, weapon access, digital location data, financial activity, and inconsistent statements. The defense later argued that Chavez was the shooter. The source description further reports that Hargrove's conviction was overturned in 2023 because of search-warrant and evidence-collection problems, with a new trial planned for April 2025.
The source does not resolve every detail of the homicide, including the complete sequence at the remote location, the precise role of Chavez, and whether all disputed evidence will be admissible at a new trial. It also does not provide a final post-appeal adjudication. Chavez's knowledge of or involvement in the killing remained disputed and she was not reported as charged.