Roop Singh Rathore Allegedly Murdered by Pooja and Shubham, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
This source-based behavioral analysis does not establish a clinical diagnosis, motive, or legal finding.
The source describes a relationship system marked by reported marital conflict, alleged alcohol-related violence, concealment, an overlapping romantic attachment, and escalation toward planned harm. These observations are behavioral and source-grounded rather than clinical. The report contains allegations and disputed accounts, and it does not provide professional psychological assessments.
Roop Singh and Pooja were reportedly married and living together with a child. The account describes Roop Singh's alleged alcohol misuse and repeated conflict with Pooja, followed by Pooja's alleged concealed relationship with Shubham, who was also Roop Singh's nephew. The alleged relationship and confrontation reportedly created a triangle in which Shubham became involved in a plan directed at Roop Singh.
The reported pathway moved from marital dissatisfaction and conflict to concealed communication and an overlapping relationship, then to alleged discovery, confrontation, threats, recruitment of others, a planned attack, and alleged staging of the scene. The source does not establish the psychological causes of the conduct or the final legal findings.
Each entry separates the reported behavior or state from the analytical strength of the available narration.
| Behavior / construct | Person / subject | Detailed case context | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chronic interpersonal conflict Relationship stressor | Roop Singh Rathore and Pooja |
The account portrays conflict as recurring rather than isolated. This reportedly created a high-conflict household in which relationship grievances were visible to the child and later became relevant to police inquiry. The source does not establish the complete history or severity of each argument. Context or trigger: The report links repeated household arguments to Roop Singh's alleged alcohol use and disagreement over Pooja's communications. Reported expression: The child reportedly described frequent fights between the couple. Roop Singh was also said to have told Pooja that her conduct was wrong and that she should stop speaking with someone. |
Explicitly reported Confidence: Moderate |
| Infidelity or competing attachment Relationship stressor | Pooja AccusedWife of the victim |
The narrated relationship structure includes an overlapping attachment outside the marriage. The alleged attachment reportedly altered loyalties within the household and became connected to later confrontation and planning. The source does not independently verify the relationship beyond the reported digital and participant accounts. Context or trigger: The report says Pooja's attraction to her husband shifted toward Shubham, her nephew, while she remained married to Roop Singh. Reported expression: Pooja and Shubham were reportedly involved in concealed communications and physical relations when Roop Singh was away. |
Narrative-supported psychological state Confidence: Moderate |
| Deception or concealment Behavioral pattern | Pooja and Shubham |
Concealment is presented as a sustained behavioral feature of the alleged relationship. The reported secrecy delayed recognition of the competing attachment and later made digital records important to the investigation. The source does not establish who initiated each concealment behavior. Context or trigger: The report describes hidden communications, private meetings, and a relationship conducted behind Roop Singh's back. Reported expression: The alleged affair was reportedly concealed through video calls, WhatsApp communications, and meetings when Roop Singh was away. |
Narrative-supported psychological state Confidence: Moderate |
| Emotional abuse Control dynamics | Roop Singh Rathore and Pooja |
If accurate, the reported injuries and repeated complaints indicate a relationship context involving fear and harm rather than ordinary disagreement. However, the claims are attributed through Shubham's reported account and are not supported by medical or independent evidence in the source. The psychological meaning for Pooja cannot be determined from the narration alone. Context or trigger: Shubham reportedly said Pooja showed injuries during video calls and said Roop Singh had beaten her. Reported expression: The report describes alleged physical abuse, repeated arguments, and distress communicated through frequent video calls. |
Analytical inference Confidence: Low |
| Relationship decision process Cognitive pattern | Shubham and Pooja |
The account describes a decision pathway in which the alleged new relationship was treated as requiring Roop Singh's removal or incapacitation. Shubham's reported statement reflects a future-oriented plan involving marriage, whereas Pooja's reported statement describes a different intended outcome. These conflicting accounts limit conclusions about shared intent. Context or trigger: The report says Shubham and Pooja allegedly developed a strong attachment while Pooja remained married. Reported expression: Shubham reportedly said he would remove Roop Singh and then marry Pooja, while Pooja reportedly disputed ordering a killing. |
Narrative-supported psychological state Confidence: Moderate |
| Premeditation and planning Planning or impulsivity | Shubham AccusedNephew of the victim |
The reported recruitment and preparation indicate advance organization rather than only spontaneous conflict. The alleged staging further suggests preparation to influence how the death would be interpreted. These are source-reported behaviors and do not by themselves establish legal responsibility. Context or trigger: The report alleges that Shubham collected money, hired four friends, and discussed a method before the attack. Reported expression: The alleged conduct included recruitment, concealment of participants in the home, instructions about suppressing sound, and later movement of the body. |
Narrative-supported psychological state Confidence: Moderate |
| Coercive control Control dynamics | Roop Singh Rathore and Pooja |
The reported behaviors may reflect control dynamics within the marriage, but the source is insufficient to establish a complete coercive-control pattern. Pooja's alleged video-call disclosures are relevant to the reported relationship pathway but do not independently confirm the allegations. The accounts also conflict with the later disputed description of what Pooja intended. Context or trigger: The report attributes to Roop Singh objections to Pooja's communications and describes alleged beatings within the marriage. Reported expression: The alleged pattern included monitoring or restricting contact and physical violence, while Pooja reportedly sought help or disclosure through Shubham. |
Analytical inference Confidence: Low |
| Staging or evidence concealment Post-offense behavior | Shubham AccusedNephew of the victim |
The reported post-incident conduct involved altering the apparent context of the death. This behavior reportedly contributed to the initial accident interpretation and delayed homicide recognition until post-mortem review. The precise actions and participants remain unclear. Context or trigger: After the alleged attack, the report says the body was moved and objects were placed to suggest an accident. Reported expression: The phone and slippers were reportedly positioned near a drain, and a vehicle was allegedly damaged or arranged to support an accident explanation. |
Narrative-supported psychological state Confidence: Moderate |
Select a stage to expand it; scroll horizontally to follow the full sequence.
The report says Roop Singh pursued Pooja after meeting her at a wedding, and the couple married after their families accepted the proposal. They later had a child and lived together in Madhya Pradesh.
The family reportedly moved from a village area to Indore because income was considered insufficient and the couple wanted better educational opportunities for their child. Roop Singh later experienced job instability before starting a small bedding business.
The report describes Roop Singh's increasing alcohol use and recurrent arguments or physical conflict at home. A child reportedly later confirmed that the parents often fought.
The narrated account says Pooja's attraction shifted from Roop Singh to Shubham, her nephew. It alleges that the pair maintained concealed communications and physical relations while Roop Singh was away.
The report says Roop Singh learned of the alleged relationship, beat Shubham, and expelled him from the home. This is presented as a major escalation point before the alleged planning.
According to the report, Shubham collected money, recruited four friends, and discussed a plan to attack Roop Singh. The account also attributes to him a promise to marry Pooja after Roop Singh was removed.
The report alleges that the recruited group attacked Roop Singh after he returned intoxicated on February 14, 2024. It describes a coordinated assault and subsequent movement of the body, while the exact individual actions remain uncertain.
The source alleges that the body, phone, slippers, and vehicle were arranged to make the death look accidental. Police reportedly initially accepted that explanation until post-mortem findings indicated planned homicide.
Arrows show the sequence described in the source narrative; they do not prove that one psychological state caused the next event.
The source is a narrated YouTube crime report with commentary, uncertain wording, and no clinical records. Several statements are attributed to police interrogation or participants without independent documentation. No professional diagnosis is reported, and behavioral interpretation cannot establish intent, causation, or guilt.