← Back to United States casesBen Renick Murdered by Lindley Renick, Michael Humphrey, and others, Montgomery County, Missouri, United States
Case Summary
On June 8, 2017, Ben Renick was found shot eight times at the Renick Reptiles facility in Montgomery County, Missouri. The scene initially created confusion because the facility contained thousands of snakes, but a shell casing and examination of the body established homicide. Investigators examined robbery, family, financial, infidelity, and relationship theories. Lindley Renick's alleged affairs, financial conflicts, communications with Michael Humphrey, and accounts from Brandon Blackwell and Ashley Shaw became central to the case. Lindley and Michael Humphrey were arrested in January 2020. Humphrey was convicted of first-degree murder and later cooperated with prosecutors. Lindley was convicted of second-degree murder and armed criminal action and received consecutive sentences totaling 16 years.
Basic Information
Country: United States
State/Province: Missouri, United States
City/Region: Montgomery County
Incident Type: Domestic Violence Homicide
Relationship Status: Married
Relationship Duration: Approximately 6 years (marriage and cohabitation period described from 2011 to 2017)
Affair / New-Partner Context
Recorded context: Affair started / overlapping relationship
Reported initiator: Victim
Relationship timing: During marriage or ongoing partnership, before separation
Incident Date: June 8, 2017
Incident Sequence and Additional Victims
Primary reported outcome: Homicide
Reported self-harm outcome: Completed suicide
Person(s) reported to have died by or attempted suicide: Frank Renick
Reported role: Another person
Reported sequence: Order not reported / unclear
Relationship Journey
Relationship Origins:
- Met on social media
- Dating app
Relationship Stages:
- Dating
- Living Together without Marriage
- Married Living Together
- Separated
- Love Marriage
Analysis
Contributing Factors:
- Cheating / Infidelity
- Financial Issues
- Domestic Violence Allegation
- Domestic Conflict
- Money / Financial Gain
- Divorce / Separation
Red Flags:
- Unexplained spending or money transfers
- Financial secrecy
- Discovery of suspicious emails
- Deception after incident
- Escalation Pattern / Violence
- Suspects identified
- Secret affair
- Manipulative behavior
- Missing Suspect
Motives:
- Money / Financial Gain
- Escape marriage
- Extramarital relationship
- Fear of exposure
- Desire for new relationship
Relationship Outcomes:
- Legal case ongoing
- Homicide during marriage
- Arrest made
- Relationship ended
- Weapon recovery
Source Video
Video hosted by YouTube · Viewer discretion advised
People Link Graph
Ben Renick Murdered by Lindley Renick, Michael Humphrey, and others, Montgomery County, Missouri, United States
Relationship Journey Graph
Origin
- Met on social media
- Dating app
How the relationship or connection began.
Status
- Married
Approximately 6 years (marriage and cohabitation period described from 2011 to 2017)
Stages
- Dating
- Living Together without Marriage
- Married Living Together
- Separated
- Love Marriage
Important relationship phases recorded for this case.
Warning Signals
- Unexplained spending or money transfers
- Financial secrecy
- Discovery of suspicious emails
- Deception after incident
- Escalation Pattern / Violence
- Suspects identified
- Secret affair
- Manipulative behavior
- Missing Suspect
Reported red flags or early concern points.
Pressure Points
- Cheating / Infidelity
- Financial Issues
- Domestic Violence Allegation
- Domestic Conflict
- Money / Financial Gain
- Divorce / Separation
- Money / Financial Gain
- Escape marriage
- Extramarital relationship
- Fear of exposure
- Desire for new relationship
Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.
Incident
2017-06-08
Outcome
- Legal case ongoing
- Homicide during marriage
- Arrest made
- Relationship ended
- Weapon recovery
Recorded relationship or case outcome.
AI Intelligence Assessment
Relationship Pattern
Infidelity
Pattern Analysis
The reported relationship conflict involved a marriage that began after dating and cohabitation, followed by alleged infidelity, financial secrecy, and a claimed plan to pursue divorce. The source presents competing accounts about whether Lindley planned Ben's killing, whether Michael Humphrey acted independently, and whether Ashley Shaw's testimony was influenced by prosecutorial pressure. The convictions established legal outcomes, but the source preserves disputes about the precise roles of the participants.
Investigative Notes
The death was initially investigated as a possible snake attack or robbery because the facility contained more than 3,000 snakes. A shell casing and the discovery of eight gunshot wounds established homicide, while investigators found that no snakes were missing. Sam Renick was investigated and later ruled out after a negative gunshot-residue result and extensive cooperation. Lindley's gunshot-residue test was negative, and no murder weapon or direct evidence was initially recovered. The case remained cold for nearly three years until Brandon Blackwell provided information from jail. Lindley Renick and Michael Humphrey were arrested on January 16, 2020. Humphrey was convicted of first-degree murder, later disclosed the location of the firearm, and testified or cooperated against Lindley. Lindley was convicted of second-degree murder and armed criminal action and received consecutive sentences of 13 and 3 years.
Investigation Confusion
The scene initially suggested a possible snake attack because of the large number of exotic snakes and an apparent bite mark. The robbery theory was later ruled out because no snakes were missing. Investigators faced conflicting accounts about whether Lindley, Humphrey, or both were responsible, and whether Ashley Shaw's testimony was truthful or influenced by pressure and an offer of leniency. Lindley claimed Humphrey acted independently, while the prosecution relied on accounts that she participated and pulled the trigger. Her alleged abuse claims were disputed and had not been reported to police.
Case Reconstruction / Puzzle Pieces
Ben and Lindley had met as teenagers, reconnected in 2011, moved in together, married in 2014, had a child, and operated businesses. By 2017, Ben's reptile business was highly valuable, a planned sale was expected to generate about $1.2 million, Lindley's spa was reportedly losing money, and Ben had confronted her about lying and unpaid obligations. The source also reports that Lindley admitted infidelity and had contact with Brandon Blackwell and Michael Humphrey. After the homicide, Lindley allegedly sold the family property and left town. A later account from Blackwell and testimony from Ashley Shaw implicated Lindley and Humphrey in alleged poisoning and shooting plans. Humphrey's later disclosure led to recovery of the firearm, while trial witnesses gave competing accounts of who fired the shots. Lindley's conviction and sentence followed the jury's acceptance of the prosecution's case.
Risk Assessment
The source describes a high-risk combination of alleged infidelity, financial conflict, marital deterioration, alleged deception, possible separation planning, third-party involvement, access to a firearm, and alleged prior poisoning efforts. The account also includes conflicting statements and incentives for cooperating witnesses, so behavioral indicators should not be treated as proof of responsibility.
Key Takeaways
The case shows how an unusual crime scene can delay recognition of the actual homicide method. Relationship intelligence centered on alleged infidelity, a deteriorating marriage, financial secrecy, possible divorce planning, third-party relationships, and post-incident deception. The account also highlights the importance of separating verified forensic findings from informant statements, changing stories, polygraph results, and disputed courtroom narratives.
AI Case Q&A
What early signals mattered most?
The most important reported signals were alleged affairs, hidden contact with other men, financial problems at Lindley's spa, Ben's messages accusing her of lying and withholding information, alleged marital deterioration, and contact with Michael Humphrey near the homicide. These signals are source-reported and do not independently establish intent or responsibility.
Which clues helped connect the case?
The shell casing and autopsy findings connected the death to a shooting rather than a snake attack. The absence of missing snakes weakened the robbery theory. Later investigative clues included Lindley's communications, the relationship disclosures, Blackwell's jailhouse account, Ashley Shaw's testimony, Humphrey's changed account, and the eventual location of the firearm.
Which evidence types appeared strongest?
The strongest reported evidence included the physical finding of eight gunshot wounds, the shell casing, the recovered firearm, phone and Facebook communications, witness and cooperating-participant testimony, and trial testimony. Gunshot-residue results were significant but mixed: Sam tested negative, and Lindley's test was also reported as negative.
Witness / Eyewitness Statements
Lindley reported finding Ben and initially described the event as a possible snake killing. Sam described the family relationship, provided an alibi, and later testified about the impact of the death and sentence. Ashley Shaw alleged that Lindley sought pills and later confessed to shooting Ben. Brandon Blackwell alleged that Lindley described poisoning and a shooting plan. Humphrey later said Lindley fired the gun, while Lindley testified that Humphrey acted independently. The source also reports disputed claims of physical abuse within the marriage.
How did follow-up reports change the understanding?
Early reports focused on a possible snake attack and robbery. Forensic examination changed the case to homicide, and investigators later shifted attention toward people close to Ben. The case remained unresolved for nearly three years before Blackwell's information, arrests, cooperating testimony, firearm recovery, Humphrey's conviction, and Lindley's conviction provided a legal resolution. The source still presents disputes over witness credibility and the exact division of responsibility.
What remained unclear?
The source leaves disputed the precise roles of Lindley, Humphrey, and Ashley in planning and execution, the reliability of changing witness accounts, and the full factual basis of the alleged poisoning attempt. It also does not provide a complete independent explanation for the negative gunshot-residue results or every detail of the firearm's chain of custody.