RelationWatch
OSINT Case File

Tejeshwar Disappearance Involving Aishwarya, Sujata, and others, Panyam, Andhra Pradesh, India

Case Summary

On May 18, 2025, 32-year-old land surveyor Tejeshwar married Aishwarya. Prior to the marriage, in February 2025, the couple was engaged, but five days before their scheduled wedding, Aishwarya went missing. She returned five days later, blaming stress over wedding preparations and dowry demands, and persuaded Tejeshwar to go ahead with the wedding. After moving into Tejeshwar's home, Aishwarya remained distant, avoided physical intimacy, and spent excessive time on her phone, leading to frequent domestic disputes. On June 17, 2025, Tejeshwar was lured away from his workplace under the pretext of surveying 10 acres of land by individuals posing as bank clients. He was taken in a vehicle to a secluded area near Panyam, Andhra Pradesh, where he was stabbed repeatedly and his throat was slit. His brother filed a missing person report on June 17. Days later, Tejeshwar's decomposed body was found in bushes near Sugali Metu within the jurisdiction of the Panyam police station. Call detail records revealed over 2,000 calls between Aishwarya and a bank employee after the wedding. Investigation revealed that the bank employee was involved in romantic affairs with both Aishwarya and her mother, Sujata. The three allegedly conspired to eliminate Tejeshwar by hiring contract killers. Police arrested Aishwarya and Sujata, and the investigation remains ongoing.

Verified True
Confidence 4
Incident Date June 17, 2025
Incident Type Domestic Violence Homicide

Basic Information

Country: India

State/Province: Andhra Pradesh, India

City/Region: Panyam

Incident Type: Domestic Violence Homicide

Relationship Status: Married

Relationship Duration: Approximately 1 month (marriage)

Incident Date: June 17, 2025

Relationship Journey

Relationship Origins:

  • Family introduction
  • Arranged marriage

Relationship Stages:

  • Married Living Together
  • Arragned Marriage

Analysis

Contributing Factors:

  • Cheating / Infidelity
  • Domestic Conflict
  • Property Gain
  • Money / Financial Gain

Red Flags:

  • Excessive phone usage
  • Secretive communication patterns
  • Reduced emotional engagement
  • Discovery of hidden calls or messages
  • Seeking forgiveness after breach of trust
  • Suspects identified
  • Secret affair
  • Manipulative behavior
  • Secret phone communication
  • Missing Victim

Motives:

  • Money / Financial Gain
  • Eliminate spouse
  • Extramarital relationship
  • Property Gain

Relationship Outcomes:

  • Homicide during marriage
  • Arrest made
  • Investigation still ongoing
  • Contract killing involved
  • Deadbody recovery

People Link Graph

Relationship Journey Graph

1

Origin

  • Family introduction
  • Arranged marriage

How the relationship or connection began.

2

Status

  • Married

Approximately 1 month (marriage)

3

Stages

  • Married Living Together
  • Arragned Marriage

Important relationship phases recorded for this case.

4

Warning Signals

  • Excessive phone usage
  • Secretive communication patterns
  • Reduced emotional engagement
  • Discovery of hidden calls or messages
  • Seeking forgiveness after breach of trust
  • Suspects identified
  • Secret affair
  • Manipulative behavior
  • Secret phone communication
  • Missing Victim

Reported red flags or early concern points.

5

Pressure Points

  • Cheating / Infidelity
  • Domestic Conflict
  • Property Gain
  • Money / Financial Gain
  • Money / Financial Gain
  • Eliminate spouse
  • Extramarital relationship
  • Property Gain

Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.

6

Incident

2025-06-17

7

Outcome

  • Homicide during marriage
  • Arrest made
  • Investigation still ongoing
  • Contract killing involved
  • Deadbody recovery

Recorded relationship or case outcome.

Sources

English labels are shown first. Original-language titles are preserved for source verification.

AI Intelligence Assessment

Relationship Pattern

Infidelity

Pattern Analysis

The case fits a premeditated contract homicide scheme driven by infidelity, property interest, and deceptive relationship preservation. The female suspect ran away shortly before the wedding but manipulated the victim into marrying her. Following the wedding, she maintained an ongoing extramarital relationship, resulting in marital friction, before conspiring with her mother and lover to arrange a contract killing using false pretenses.

Investigative Notes

The investigation began as a missing person case reported by the victim's brother on June 17, 2025. Upon the recovery of a heavily decomposed body in Sugali Metu, Panyam, police matched the physical description to Tejeshwar. Call detail records (CDR) were crucial, revealing over 2,000 phone calls between Aishwarya and a bank employee after the wedding. Further interrogation revealed that both Aishwarya and her mother Sujata shared a romantic connection with the bank employee, who hired contract killers. Both women were taken into police custody while the investigation continues.

Investigation Confusion

Initial confusion stemmed from treating Tejeshwar's disappearance as a standard missing person case until a body matching his description was discovered in another police jurisdiction. Investigators were initially faced with identifying the recipient of over 2,000 calls on Aishwarya's phone, which eventually linked her to the bank employee and the staged land survey abduction.

Case Reconstruction / Puzzle Pieces

Aishwarya and Tejeshwar were engaged in February 2025. After fleeing for five days before the May 18 wedding, Aishwarya convinced Tejeshwar to proceed. After marriage, she kept her distance while making frequent calls to her lover. Aishwarya, Sujata, and the bank employee plotted to murder Tejeshwar. On June 17, fake clients approached Tejeshwar at his work under the guise of surveying 10 acres of land, lured him into a car, transported him to a deserted area near Panyam, and fatally stabbed him. His body was concealed in bushes until police recovered it.

Risk Assessment

Key risk indicators included pre-marital disappearance, deceptive explanations, extreme emotional withdrawal immediately following marriage, excessive secretive phone usage, and pre-existing extramarital relationships involving family members.

Key Takeaways

Pre-marital evasive conduct combined with abrupt shifts in post-marital emotional availability and intense secretive communication serve as critical warning indicators. The use of deceptive commercial opportunities (fake land surveying) highlights how perpetrators exploit occupational routines to conduct abductions.

AI Case Q&A

What early signals mattered most?

Aishwarya's unexplained disappearance five days before the wedding, followed by immediate emotional coldness, refusal of intimacy, and constant phone usage after the wedding were major early signals.

Which clues helped connect the case?

Call detail records (CDR) showing over 2,000 calls between Aishwarya and the bank employee post-marriage served as the primary clue connecting the suspects to the crime.

Which evidence types appeared strongest?

The recovered body showing sharp-force trauma and a slit throat, forensic post-mortem findings, and CDR data were the primary pieces of evidence.

Witness / Eyewitness Statements

The victim's brother reported that Tejeshwar had been missing since June 17, 2025, following ongoing domestic turmoil at home after his marriage.

How did follow-up reports change the understanding?

Follow-up investigative analysis converted a missing person case into a contract murder investigation involving multiple conspirators across family and extramarital networks.

What remained unclear?

The identities and capture status of the specific contract killers hired by the bank employee remain to be detailed, along with the formal legal charges and court proceedings.

← Back to Home