According to the source, 20-year-old law student Prince Raj repeatedly proposed to his 19-year-old classmate Sandeep Kaur, who consistently refused and had an engagement arranged elsewhere. After another refusal in a phone call on February 8, Raj allegedly approached Kaur in their law-college classroom on February 9, produced a pistol, and shot her. Kaur died at the scene, while Raj reportedly shot himself and was taken to hospital in critical condition. The source says the incident was captured on classroom CCTV and that the pistol may have belonged to Raj's retired CRPF father.
Country: India
State/Province: Punjab, India
City/Region: Tarn Taran
Incident Type: Murder
Relationship Status: One-sided love
Relationship Duration: Approximately 1 year (one-sided pursuit)
Incident Date: Feb. 9, 2026
Primary reported outcome: Homicide
Reported self-harm outcome: Attempted suicide; medical outcome reported
Person(s) reported to have died by or attempted suicide: Prince Raj
Reported role: Alleged suspect / offender
Reported sequence: Homicide or serious injury, then suicide or attempt
Additional victims reported: 0
Relationship Origins:
Relationship Stages:
Contributing Factors:
Red Flags:
Motives:
Relationship Outcomes:
Video hosted by YouTube · Viewer discretion advised
How the relationship or connection began.
Approximately 1 year (one-sided pursuit)
Important relationship phases recorded for this case.
Reported red flags or early concern points.
Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.
2026-02-09
Recorded relationship or case outcome.
One-sided love
The source describes an unreciprocated attachment that continued despite repeated refusals. The reported pattern escalated from repeated proposals and visits to the victim's home to a firearm attack in a classroom. The victim's family responsibilities and arranged engagement formed part of the reported context, but the source does not establish a confirmed legal motive.
The source reports that classroom CCTV captured the incident. Sandeep Kaur reportedly died at the scene, while Prince Raj was taken to hospital in critical condition after allegedly shooting himself. The pistol was reportedly possibly linked to Raj's retired CRPF father, but ownership was not confirmed in the source. No arrest, charge, conviction, or detailed police statement is provided. The matter should be treated as subject to ongoing investigation and source limitations.
The source contains an internal calendar inconsistency, describing February 8 as Sunday and February 9 as Saturday, although the reported sequence is a February 8 phone proposal followed by a February 9 classroom incident. The source also says the pistol may have belonged to Raj's father and does not provide confirmed forensic or police findings.
The reported sequence begins with the students meeting at a law college approximately one year before the incident. Prince Raj allegedly developed one-sided feelings, repeatedly proposed to Sandeep Kaur, and visited her home despite her refusals. After learning that her engagement had been arranged elsewhere, he reportedly made another proposal by phone on February 8. On the following college day, he allegedly proposed again in the classroom, shot Kaur after another refusal, and then shot himself. CCTV, the presence of Kaur's friend, the reported firearm, and the hospital outcome form the main source-described investigative links.
The reported combination of persistent unwanted pursuit, repeated refusal, visits to the victim's home, distress after learning of her engagement, access to a firearm, and alleged self-harm indicates a serious escalation pattern. The source does not provide a complete prior-threat history or an official risk assessment.
The source highlights persistent unwanted pursuit, inability to accept refusal, escalating contact, firearm access, and a reported suicide attempt after the homicide as important warning indicators. The case also illustrates the danger of framing possessive or retaliatory conduct as romantic love. Official investigative findings, prior complaint records, and the legal outcome are not supplied.
The most important reported early signals were repeated proposals despite refusal, visits to Sandeep Kaur's home, distress after learning of her engagement, and continued pursuit before the classroom confrontation.
The reported clues connecting the case were the classroom CCTV, the direct presence of Prince Raj and Sandeep Kaur, the account that he proposed immediately before the shooting, the reported firearm, and his subsequent critical injuries.
The strongest source-described evidence appears to be the classroom CCTV recording and the reported physical sequence. The source also refers to a pistol and hospital treatment, but it does not provide forensic results, witness testimony in detail, or official investigative documentation.
The source says a friend was standing beside Sandeep Kaur and did not have time to understand what was happening. No direct quotation or detailed witness statement is reported. The narrator also refers to CCTV footage and an uncertain account of the pistol's ownership.
The source reports that Sandeep Kaur died at the scene and that Prince Raj was hospitalized in critical condition. It does not provide later medical, police, charging, court, or conviction updates.
The source leaves unclear the official motive classification, the pistol's ownership and licensing, the complete prior-contact history, whether any complaints or threats were documented, Prince Raj's later medical outcome, and the legal status of the case.