← Back to India casesShiva Sharma Allegedly Murdered by Shraddha Dubey, Rashmi Dubey, and others, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
Case Summary
Lucknow businessman Shiva Sharma died after falling from the fourth floor of his flat under circumstances treated by police as a suspected murder. His mother, Ranjana Sharma, alleged that model and social media influencer Shraddha Dubey, her sister Rashmi Dubey, and driver Tanveer alias Danish assaulted Shiva and pushed him. Shraddha denied the allegation and said Shiva died by suicide. After approximately 11 days of evading arrest and reportedly changing locations, the three were arrested in Nagpur on October 20, 2026, in a joint operation involving Lucknow Police, the Uttar Pradesh STF, and Nagpur Police. The investigation and legal proceedings were continuing.
Basic Information
Country: India
State/Province: Uttar Pradesh, India
City/Region: Lucknow
Incident Type: Murder
Relationship Status: Live-in relationship
Relationship Duration: Approximately 4 months (live-in relationship)
Incident Date: Oct. 9, 2026
Relationship Journey
Relationship Origins:
- Met at Workplace
- Friends circle
Relationship Stages:
- Living Together without Marriage
- Police report filed
Analysis
Contributing Factors:
- Domestic Conflict
Red Flags:
- Secretive communication patterns
- Deception after incident
- Escalation Pattern / Violence
- Missing Suspect
Motives:
- No data available.
Relationship Outcomes:
- Legal case ongoing
- Arrest made
- Investigation still ongoing
Source Video
Video hosted by YouTube · Viewer discretion advised
People Link Graph
Shiva Sharma Allegedly Murdered by Shraddha Dubey, Rashmi Dubey, and others, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
Relationship Journey Graph
Origin
- Met at Workplace
- Friends circle
How the relationship or connection began.
Status
- Live-in relationship
Approximately 4 months (live-in relationship)
Stages
- Living Together without Marriage
- Police report filed
Important relationship phases recorded for this case.
Warning Signals
- Secretive communication patterns
- Deception after incident
- Escalation Pattern / Violence
- Missing Suspect
Reported red flags or early concern points.
Pressure Points
- Domestic Conflict
Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.
Incident
2026-10-09
Outcome
- Legal case ongoing
- Arrest made
- Investigation still ongoing
Recorded relationship or case outcome.
AI Intelligence Assessment
Relationship Pattern
Domestic Violence
Pattern Analysis
The case centers on a reported live-in relationship between Shiva Sharma and Shraddha Dubey that lasted approximately four months. Shiva's mother alleged an assault followed by a fatal push, while Shraddha denied murder and characterized the death as suicide. The post-incident flight, disputed public explanations, and arrest of three people created a domestic-violence and accountability-focused investigation, but the source does not establish criminal responsibility.
Investigative Notes
Hazratganj Police Station reportedly registered case number 216/2026 under section 103 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita on Ranjana Sharma's complaint. Shraddha Dubey, Rashmi Dubey, and Tanveer alias Danish were identified as wanted accused and were reportedly arrested in Nagpur on October 20, 2026, after approximately 11 days of evasion. The operation involved Lucknow Police, the Uttar Pradesh STF, and Nagpur Police. Police reportedly used a Kanpur-registered vehicle, IP-address information, CCTV footage, and technical tracking. The three were to be brought to Lucknow on transit remand for interrogation and further legal action. The source does not report a conviction or final forensic determination.
Investigation Confusion
The central uncertainty is whether Shiva Sharma was murdered, as alleged by his mother and reflected in the registered murder case, or died by suicide, as claimed by Shraddha Dubey. Reports about Nepal, Agra, Pune, and Nagpur created an initially unclear movement trail, and the source contains inconsistent references to Pune and Nagpur as the place of apprehension. The involvement and specific conduct of Rashmi and Tanveer remained unclear, as did the identity of any additional helpers.
Case Reconstruction / Puzzle Pieces
Shiva Sharma reportedly died after falling from the fourth floor of his Lucknow flat while living with Shraddha Dubey. His mother alleged that Shiva was first assaulted and then pushed, leading police to register a murder case. Shraddha rejected the allegation and publicly described the death as suicide, but she, Rashmi Dubey, and Tanveer alias Danish reportedly remained unavailable for approximately 11 days while moving through or being reported in Nepal, Agra, and other locations. Investigators reportedly linked the group through vehicle information, IP-address data, CCTV, and technical tracking, eventually locating them in a Nagpur flat and arresting them on October 20, 2026. Transit-remand proceedings and further interrogation were expected to clarify the disputed account.
Risk Assessment
The source describes a high-risk unresolved death involving an intimate partner, an alleged physical assault, a fatal fall, and a disputed account of suicide versus homicide. Reported evasion, repeated location changes, limited communication, and involvement of accompanying associates were significant investigative concerns. The source does not provide enough information to assess prior abuse, threats, weapons, or the final cause and manner of death.
Key Takeaways
The strongest source-supported intelligence concerns the short live-in relationship, the alleged assault and fatal fall, the conflicting homicide and suicide narratives, and the coordinated evasion after the death. Repeated location changes, limited communications, use of disguising clothing, low-end lodging, and travel with two associates were reported as important investigative indicators. These facts may support comparison with intimate-partner cases involving disputed falls and post-incident flight, but they do not establish guilt or motive.
AI Case Q&A
What early signals mattered most?
The most important reported signals were the alleged physical assault before the fall, the disputed intimate-partner context, and the three accused people reportedly becoming unavailable after Shiva's death. The source also describes repeated location changes, limited communications, low-end lodging, and efforts to avoid tracking.
Which clues helped connect the case?
According to the source, investigators used a Kanpur-registered vehicle, IP-address information, CCTV footage, technical location data, and information about travel through Nepal and Agra. These clues reportedly helped connect Shraddha, Rashmi, and Tanveer and locate them in Nagpur.
Which evidence types appeared strongest?
The source presents the mother's complaint, the registered murder case, hotel CCTV footage, technical tracking, vehicle information, IP-address data, and public videos as important evidence types. It does not report forensic findings, a final post-mortem conclusion, recovered weapons, or a court-tested evidentiary determination.
Witness / Eyewitness Statements
Ranjana Sharma reportedly alleged that Shiva was assaulted and pushed from the fourth floor. Shraddha Dubey publicly denied murder and said Shiva died by suicide. Police officials reportedly described the tracking, arrests, travel pattern, and available CCTV and technical information. No independent eyewitness account of the fall was reported.
How did follow-up reports change the understanding?
Follow-up reporting changed the case from an unresolved search for Shraddha, Rashmi, and Tanveer to a reported arrest in Nagpur on October 20, 2026. It added details about the alleged travel route, disguising clothing, low-end lodging, vehicle and IP-address tracking, and planned transit-remand interrogation. The death itself remained disputed.
What remained unclear?
The final manner and cause of Shiva Sharma's death remained unresolved in the source. It was unclear whether he was pushed or died by suicide, what each arrested person allegedly did, whether any additional helpers were involved, why Nagpur was selected, and what forensic or court findings would ultimately establish.