← Back to Iran casesAli and Reza Disappearance Involving Hamid and Javad, Khorramabad
Case Summary
The source reports that Ali, a 40-year-old private-company employee, disappeared in Tehran on May 25, 2019, after repeatedly pursuing marriage with Setayesh, the daughter of Hamid. Police traced Ali's final call and planned meeting to Hamid, who initially denied contact but later confessed to striking Ali and moving his body toward Lorestan. Forensic findings contradicted parts of Hamid's account, and surveillance evidence led to the arrest of his friend Javad. The source further reports that Hamid confessed to killing Reza, a company CEO who had disappeared in Khorramabad in 2017, allegedly because of financial disputes. Hamid received death sentences in both cases, confirmed by the Supreme Court but reportedly not yet carried out; Javad received an eight-year prison sentence.
Basic Information
Country: Iran
State/Province: Lorestān, Iran
City/Region: Khorramabad
Incident Type: Murder
Relationship Status: Rejected proposal
Relationship Duration:
Incident Date: May 25, 2019
Incident Sequence and Additional Victims
Primary reported outcome: Homicide
Reported self-harm outcome: No suicide or attempt reported
Reported sequence: Order not reported / unclear
Additional victims reported: 1
Additional victim events:
- Reza — Other third party; Killed; Order not reported / unclear
Relationship Journey
Relationship Origins:
- Met at Workplace
- Friends circle
Relationship Stages:
- Dating
- Engaged
Analysis
Contributing Factors:
- Financial Issues
- Domestic Conflict
- Love obsession
- Family pressure
- Suspicion of infidelity
Red Flags:
- Secretive communication patterns
- Unusual closeness with a specific third person
- False accusations of financial misconduct
- Discovery of suspicious emails
- Deception after incident
- Escalation Pattern / Violence
- Manipulative behavior
- Threats
- Stalking / Repeated Harassment
- High-Conflict Household
Motives:
- Money / Financial Gain
- Revenge
- Property dispute
- Fear of reputation damage
- Eliminate romantic partner
Relationship Outcomes:
- Legal case ongoing
- Homicide before marriage
- Arrest made
- Relationship ended
- Weapon recovery
- Investigation still ongoing
- Deadbody recovery
Source Video
Video hosted by YouTube · Viewer discretion advised
People Link Graph
Ali and Reza Disappearance Involving Hamid and Javad, Khorramabad
Relationship Journey Graph
Origin
- Met at Workplace
- Friends circle
How the relationship or connection began.
Status
- Rejected proposal
Stages
- Dating
- Engaged
Important relationship phases recorded for this case.
Warning Signals
- Secretive communication patterns
- Unusual closeness with a specific third person
- False accusations of financial misconduct
- Discovery of suspicious emails
- Deception after incident
- Escalation Pattern / Violence
- Manipulative behavior
- Threats
- Stalking / Repeated Harassment
- High-Conflict Household
Reported red flags or early concern points.
Pressure Points
- Financial Issues
- Domestic Conflict
- Love obsession
- Family pressure
- Suspicion of infidelity
- Money / Financial Gain
- Revenge
- Property dispute
- Fear of reputation damage
- Eliminate romantic partner
Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.
Incident
2019-05-25
Outcome
- Legal case ongoing
- Homicide before marriage
- Arrest made
- Relationship ended
- Weapon recovery
- Investigation still ongoing
- Deadbody recovery
Recorded relationship or case outcome.
AI Intelligence Assessment
Relationship Pattern
Family Opposition
Pattern Analysis
The Ali-Hamid conflict centered on a rejected marriage proposal and Hamid's opposition to Ali marrying his daughter. The source portrays repeated calls and continued marriage requests by Ali as escalating family tension, followed by a confrontation and fatal violence. A separate alleged homicide involving Reza was linked to Hamid through reported shareholder disputes, making the overall case broader than the romantic conflict.
Investigative Notes
Police reportedly traced Ali's last call to Hamid, arrested Hamid, reviewed call records, recovered Ali's body in Lorestan, and obtained forensic findings showing multiple fractures. Surveillance evidence contradicted Hamid's initial claim that he acted alone and led to Javad's arrest. Hamid reportedly confessed to Ali's killing and later to Reza's killing over financial disputes. The source states that Hamid received death sentences in both cases, confirmed by the Supreme Court, but that execution had not occurred by the report date. Javad reportedly received an eight-year prison sentence for presence at the crime scene and collaboration. The source does not provide full court documents, exact forensic conclusions, or independent corroboration of every confession detail.
Investigation Confusion
The investigation began as two separate missing-person cases. Hamid initially denied recent contact with Ali despite call records, later gave an account that conflicted with forensic findings, and initially denied having an accomplice. The reported location of Ali's body was initially incorrect or incomplete, and surveillance evidence changed the understanding of Javad's involvement. Reza's case remained unresolved for about two years before his family connected Hamid to the disappearance; the source later reports a confession but does not provide independent detail about the recovery of Reza's body.
Case Reconstruction / Puzzle Pieces
Reza disappeared in Khorramabad on April 26, 2017, after reportedly planning a meeting with Hamid about company disputes. The case remained unresolved until Ali disappeared in Tehran on May 25, 2019, after a rejected marriage proposal involving Hamid's daughter, Setayesh. Ali's final call and planned meeting led police to Hamid, whose denials were contradicted by call records. Hamid reportedly confessed, body recovery and forensic findings exposed inconsistencies, and surveillance linked Javad to the journey. Reza's family then disclosed Hamid's shareholder relationship and business conflict with Reza, after which the source reports that Hamid confessed to Reza's killing.
Risk Assessment
The source reports a high-risk escalation involving repeated unwanted contact, family opposition, deception allegations, confrontation, anger, physical assault, concealment of a body, and later alleged homicide connected to financial conflict. The account is partly based on reported confessions and police findings, and the precise sequence and legal responsibility should be treated according to the reported court outcomes rather than inferred independently.
Key Takeaways
The source highlights repeated unwanted contact after a rejected proposal, family opposition, concealment and deception after a violent confrontation, and the investigative value of phone records, surveillance footage, body recovery, and forensic examination. It also shows how a later relationship-linked investigation can reopen an older missing-person case when a common suspect and motive emerge. The material remains source-limited because it is a narrated video report rather than a complete court record.
AI Case Q&A
What early signals mattered most?
The most important reported early signals were Ali's repeated calls and marriage requests after rejection, family concern about his persistence, Hamid's anger, and the planned private confrontation. In the older case, reported business disputes between Reza and Hamid and their planned meeting were later considered significant.
Which clues helped connect the case?
Ali's final telephone call with Hamid and their planned meeting connected Hamid to the disappearance. Call records contradicted Hamid's denial, forensic findings contradicted parts of his account, and surveillance footage showed that another man traveled with him. Reza's son's later account connected Hamid to the earlier disappearance through company-shareholder and financial disputes.
Which evidence types appeared strongest?
The source presents telephone records, interrogation statements, body recovery, forensic examination showing multiple fractures, surveillance-camera evidence, and reported confessions as the strongest evidence types. Their precise legal weight cannot be independently assessed from the video alone.
Witness / Eyewitness Statements
Ali's father reportedly told police that Ali had never previously disappeared without informing his parents. Reza's son reportedly described Hamid's shareholder relationship and business disputes with Reza. Javad reportedly said he traveled with Hamid, left Hamid and Ali to talk, and later learned from Hamid that Ali had been killed. No independent eyewitness to the fatal assault is reported.
How did follow-up reports change the understanding?
Follow-up investigation changed Ali's case from a missing-person inquiry to a reported homicide case after police traced his final call, arrested Hamid, recovered his body, and obtained forensic findings. Surveillance then changed the understanding of Javad's role. The later disclosure by Reza's family reopened the older disappearance, and the source reports that Hamid subsequently confessed to Reza's killing.
What remained unclear?
The source does not clearly establish the complete physical sequence of Ali's death, the exact location and timing of the fatal injuries, or the full extent of Javad's knowledge and participation. It also does not provide independent recovery details for Reza, complete forensic reports, or the final execution status beyond saying Hamid remained imprisoned and the death sentences had not yet been carried out at the time of reporting.