Mojdeh, a 40-year-old divorced woman, was reported missing after allegedly disappearing during a pilgrimage visit in Mashhad. Detectives later discovered that her temporary husband, Hassan, had also entered a temporary marriage with her 20-year-old daughter, Mahsa. Mahsa told investigators that Hassan had deceived and threatened her, claiming that Mojdeh was alive in a secret clinic. Hassan later confessed that he drugged Mojdeh with juice, opened a gas valve while she was unconscious, buried her near a charcoal kiln, fabricated a medical-treatment story, and coerced Mahsa into marrying him. Her remains were recovered, and Hassan was sentenced to qisas in early July 2025; the sentence was reportedly under Supreme Court review.
Country: Iran
State/Province: Khorāsān-e Raẕavī, Iran
City/Region: Mashhad
Incident Type: Murder
Relationship Status: Secret Marriage
Relationship Duration: Approximately 5 years (relationship with Mojdeh)
Recorded context: Affair started / overlapping relationship
Reported initiator: Alleged suspect / offender
Relationship timing: During marriage or ongoing partnership, before separation
Incident Date: May 30, 2024
Relationship Origins:
Relationship Stages:
Contributing Factors:
Red Flags:
Motives:
Relationship Outcomes:
Video hosted by YouTube · Viewer discretion advised
How the relationship or connection began.
Approximately 5 years (relationship with Mojdeh)
Important relationship phases recorded for this case.
Reported red flags or early concern points.
Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.
2024-05-30
Recorded relationship or case outcome.
Romantic Triangle
The source describes a relationship that began through a workplace connection between Hassan and Mojdeh and later became an overlapping relationship involving Mojdeh's daughter, Mahsa. Hassan reportedly used deception, false claims of official authority, threats, and concealment to control Mahsa after Mojdeh's disappearance. The reported killing was connected to Hassan's stated desire to obtain Mahsa while concealing Mojdeh's death.
Detectives reopened and scrutinized a six-month-old missing-person report after noting that no one had continued looking for Mojdeh. A surprise visit to Hassan's residence revealed that Mahsa was living there as his temporary wife. Investigators reportedly found a handcuff-like key, a police handcuff, and a laptop containing material that increased suspicion. Mahsa gave a statement describing Hassan's deception and threats. Hassan initially denied wrongdoing, later confessed during interrogation, and described the killing and burial. Investigators and firefighters recovered Mojdeh's remains from near a charcoal kiln, and forensic findings reportedly supported the confession. Hassan reconstructed the scene, was transferred to prison, and was sentenced to qisas after several trial sessions in early July 2025. The source says he appealed to the Supreme Court and remained imprisoned pending a final decision.
The case was initially treated as an ordinary missing-person report because Mahsa reported that she had lost Mojdeh in a pilgrimage crowd. The lack of follow-up suggested that Mojdeh might have voluntarily left, but detectives found the inactivity suspicious. Hassan claimed that Mojdeh had disappeared and that Mahsa had freely chosen to marry him, while Mahsa later said Hassan had instructed her to submit a false report and threatened her. The source also reports that Hassan fabricated a story about Mojdeh being alive in a secret security clinic.
Mojdeh reportedly met Hassan through work at his workshop after both had divorced their spouses, and they entered a temporary marriage. Hassan later developed an interest in Mahsa while remaining involved with Mojdeh. After a dispute involving Mojdeh's alleged restriction of Hassan's contact with his family, Hassan reportedly planned the killing, rendered Mojdeh unconscious with juice, opened a gas valve, and buried her near a charcoal kiln. He then told Mahsa that her mother was alive in a secret clinic, directed her to make a misleading missing-person report, threatened her family, and entered a temporary marriage with her. Detectives connected the case through the unexplained lack of follow-up, Hassan's unusual household arrangement, discovered items and laptop material, Mahsa's testimony, Hassan's confession, scene reconstruction, body recovery, and forensic examination.
The reported risk indicators include a missing-person report that received little follow-up, deceptive claims about official authority, access to restraints, threats against Mahsa and her family, coercive temporary marriage, concealed surveillance cameras, drug use reported by Hassan, and the alleged planned killing and burial of Mojdeh. Mahsa was reportedly exposed to coercion, deception, isolation, and threats. These are source-grounded indicators and do not constitute a clinical or predictive assessment.
The case illustrates how a poorly followed-up missing-person report can conceal a homicide. Important relationship warning signs included rapid overlapping relationships, coercive control, threats, false official identities, deception about a missing partner, and pressure placed on a vulnerable family member. The source also shows the investigative value of revisiting dormant cases, comparing relationship accounts, examining digital material, and testing statements against physical recovery and forensic findings.
The most important early signals were the six-month lack of follow-up, the implausible missing-person account, Hassan's temporary marriage to both mother and daughter, his apparent use of false security-force credentials, the handcuff-related items, and Mahsa's fearful behavior.
The reported clues included Hassan's unusual household arrangement, the handcuff-like key and police handcuff, the laptop contents, Mahsa's flight and later statement, Hassan's inconsistent explanation, the alleged threats, the body location described in his confession, and the recovery of remains near the charcoal kiln.
The source presents Mahsa's statement, Hassan's later confession, laptop material, physical handcuff-related items, the scene reconstruction, recovery of Mojdeh's remains, and forensic medical findings as the strongest reported evidence types. The exact contents of the laptop and full forensic findings were not provided.
Mahsa reportedly told investigators that Hassan claimed Mojdeh was alive in a secret clinic, instructed her to report a false disappearance, and threatened her mother and family. Hassan initially denied involvement and later confessed. Hassan's statements during reconstruction reportedly described the killing and burial. Local residents reportedly expressed anger at the crime scene, but no independent eyewitness account of the killing was reported.
Follow-up investigation changed the understanding from a routine missing-person report to a suspected homicide. Mahsa's statement challenged Hassan's account, his later confession provided a reported method and burial location, and recovery of the body and forensic examination further supported the homicide reconstruction. The later legal update reported a qisas sentence and Supreme Court appeal.
The source does not provide the exact date of the killing, the complete forensic findings, the precise contents of the laptop, the legal status of any separate coercion or impersonation charges, or the final Supreme Court decision. The source's metadata identifies Tehran as the crime location, while the narrative consistently places the investigation and reported killing in Mashhad; this response follows the narrative location and records the discrepancy.