← Back to Iran casesZohreh and Aida Allegedly Murdered by Hadi, Lavizan, Tehrān, Iran
Case Summary
According to the report, Hadi allegedly strangled his wife Zohreh and 15-year-old daughter Aida inside their family home in Lavizan on April 19, 2022. The report describes prolonged marital conflict, debt, investment losses, imminent eviction, deteriorating mental health, and Hadi's unverified belief that Zohreh and Aida were conspiring to damage his reputation. Hadi was found injured and later reportedly confessed. He was evaluated by forensic medical specialists, sent to prison, sentenced to death at trial, and the sentence was reportedly upheld by the Supreme Court but had not yet been carried out when the video was published.
Basic Information
Country: Iran
State/Province: Tehrān, Iran
City/Region: Lavizan
Incident Type: Domestic Violence Homicide
Relationship Status: Married
Relationship Duration:
Incident Date: April 19, 2022
Incident Sequence and Additional Victims
Primary reported outcome: Homicide
Reported self-harm outcome: Attempted suicide; survived
Person(s) reported to have died by or attempted suicide: Hadi
Reported role: Alleged suspect / offender
Reported sequence: Homicide or serious injury, then suicide or attempt
Additional victims reported: 1
Additional victim events:
- Aida — Child; Killed; Before self-harm
Relationship Journey
Relationship Origins:
- No data available.
Relationship Stages:
- Married Living Together
Analysis
Contributing Factors:
- Financial Issues
- Domestic Conflict
- Mental instability
Red Flags:
- False accusations of infidelity
- Escalation Pattern / Violence
- Threats
- Mental Health Deterioration / Hopelessness
- High-Conflict Household
Motives:
- Eliminate spouse
- Fear of reputation damage
Relationship Outcomes:
- Legal case ongoing
- Homicide during marriage
- Arrest made
- Investigation still ongoing
- Deadbody recovery
- Suicide
Source Video
Video hosted by YouTube · Viewer discretion advised
People Link Graph
Zohreh and Aida Allegedly Murdered by Hadi, Lavizan, Tehrān, Iran
Relationship Journey Graph
Origin
How the relationship or connection began.
Status
- Married
Stages
- Married Living Together
Important relationship phases recorded for this case.
Warning Signals
- False accusations of infidelity
- Escalation Pattern / Violence
- Threats
- Mental Health Deterioration / Hopelessness
- High-Conflict Household
Reported red flags or early concern points.
Pressure Points
- Financial Issues
- Domestic Conflict
- Mental instability
- Eliminate spouse
- Fear of reputation damage
Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.
Incident
2022-04-19
Outcome
- Legal case ongoing
- Homicide during marriage
- Arrest made
- Investigation still ongoing
- Deadbody recovery
- Suicide
Recorded relationship or case outcome.
AI Intelligence Assessment
Relationship Pattern
Domestic Violence
Pattern Analysis
The reported pattern centers on a high-conflict marriage combined with financial pressure, threatened housing loss, worsening psychological functioning, and Hadi's unverified belief that his wife and daughter were conspiring against him. The conflict escalated from recurring arguments and accusations to the reported strangulation of both victims. The source also describes a subsequent nonfatal self-harm attempt and an unresolved question about whether some of Hadi's injuries were genuine or staged.
Investigative Notes
Police, a special prosecutor, detectives, and forensic medical personnel reportedly attended the Lavizan residence. Zohreh and Aida were found dead in the living room, and forensic examination attributed the deaths to strangulation occurring approximately 24 to 48 hours earlier. Investigators reportedly found no foreign fingerprints and found threads from a sweet-box cord near the bodies. Hadi was hospitalized with injuries to his hands and feet, later reportedly confessed, underwent forensic mental-health evaluation, and was sent to prison after scene reconstruction. The report states that the victims' parents sought retribution, that a death sentence was issued and upheld by the Supreme Court, and that it had not been carried out by the publication date.
Investigation Confusion
The source initially treated Hadi as a possible mentally unwell perpetrator but also raised the possibility that he had staged or minimized his self-inflicted injuries to avoid punishment. His repeated claim that he had been framed was not independently resolved in the narrative. The report also uses the name Aradi in some opening passages while identifying the accused elsewhere as Hadi, creating a naming inconsistency.
Case Reconstruction / Puzzle Pieces
The reported reconstruction places Hadi, Zohreh, Aida, and Amir in a strained household in Lavizan. Hadi was under debt, had lost money in an investment, faced imminent eviction, and was experiencing repeated conflict with Zohreh. He reportedly developed suspicious beliefs that Zohreh and Aida were trying to damage his reputation. According to his later statement, an argument with Zohreh escalated at night, after which he used cord or string to strangle her and then Aida when she entered the room. He reportedly remained in the home, attempted to harm himself the next morning, called Fariba to remove Amir from the situation, and was discovered after Amir returned from school. Scene findings, family statements, Hadi's injuries, and his reported confession formed the main investigative narrative.
Risk Assessment
The source describes a high-risk household marked by repeated marital conflict, rapid anger, severe financial stress, threatened eviction, reported mental-health deterioration, suspicious beliefs about family members, and access to a method used in the killings. The reported homicide and subsequent self-harm attempt indicate extreme escalation. The psychological and legal significance of Hadi's reported beliefs and injuries remained subject to forensic and judicial assessment.
Key Takeaways
The case illustrates how chronic domestic conflict can combine with financial crisis, housing insecurity, deteriorating mental functioning, and unverified accusations to create an acute risk environment. The reported escalation involved a spouse being killed during an argument, a child becoming an additional victim after witnessing the aftermath, and a subsequent nonfatal self-harm attempt. Early access to appropriate mental-health care was reportedly delayed, while the exact nature of Hadi's beliefs and injuries required forensic evaluation.
AI Case Q&A
What early signals mattered most?
The most important reported early signals were repeated high-conflict arguments, rapid loss of temper, debt and investment losses, imminent eviction, unusual behavior noticed by Fariba, reported psychological deterioration, and Hadi's growing belief that Zohreh and Aida were conspiring to damage his reputation.
Which clues helped connect the case?
Reported clues included the absence of foreign fingerprints, cord threads near the bodies, the victims' location in the living room, Hadi's injuries and blood-stained clothing, the family members' accounts, Hadi's repeated statement that he had been framed, and his later reported confession.
Which evidence types appeared strongest?
The strongest reported evidence types were forensic examination of the bodies, the reported strangulation findings and estimated time of death, scene examination, fingerprint findings, the cord threads, statements from Fariba and Amir, Hadi's physical condition, his reported confession, forensic mental-health assessment, and later judicial proceedings.
Witness / Eyewitness Statements
Fariba reportedly said Hadi called her repeatedly and sounded unable to speak normally. She said she entered the home, found Zohreh and Aida unresponsive, observed Hadi injured and silent, protected Amir in another room, and called police. Amir reportedly said he saw his mother and sister apparently sleeping, later saw Hadi injured, and only understood what had happened when neither victim responded.
How did follow-up reports change the understanding?
Follow-up reporting changed the understanding from an unexplained double death to a case focused on Hadi after scene examination, family statements, the absence of foreign fingerprints, the cord evidence, and his reported confession. Later reports in the video described forensic mental-health evaluation, scene reconstruction, imprisonment, a death sentence, Supreme Court confirmation, and a pending execution. The source does not provide independent documentation beyond this video account.
What remained unclear?
The source leaves uncertainty about the precise nature of Hadi's reported suspicious beliefs, whether his self-inflicted injuries were a genuine suicide attempt or partly staged, and the exact legal meaning of the reported forensic conclusion that his mental health was confirmed. The opening passages also inconsistently refer to him as Aradi and Hadi.