← Back to Iran casesHashem Disappearance Involving Mitra, Peyman, and others, Tehran, Tehrān, Iran
Case Summary
According to the source, Hashem disappeared in early Esfand 1403 after years of conflict with his wife, Mitra, who had reportedly sought a divorce but said he refused. Police investigated Mitra and arrested her as a primary suspect. Investigators later linked Mitra to an affair with Peyman, a married metalworker, and reported that phone messages discussed removing Hashem. Peyman, Amin, and Farrokh allegedly abducted Hashem, took him to Peyman's workshop, restrained him, killed him with a rope, placed his body in a sack, and threw it into the Kan River. The suspects initially gave conflicting accounts but later reportedly confirmed a joint role. The case remained before the courts, with the suspects in custody.
Basic Information
Country: Iran
State/Province: Tehrān, Iran
City/Region: Tehran
Incident Type: Murder
Relationship Status: Married
Relationship Duration: Approximately 10 years (marriage)
Affair / New-Partner Context
Recorded context: Affair started / overlapping relationship
Reported initiator: Both
Relationship timing: During marriage or ongoing partnership, before separation
Incident Date: Feb. 19, 2025
Incident Sequence and Additional Victims
Primary reported outcome: Homicide
Reported self-harm outcome: No suicide or attempt reported
Reported sequence: Order not reported / unclear
Additional victims reported: 0
Relationship Journey
Relationship Origins:
- Family introduction
- Met on social media
Relationship Stages:
- Dating
- Married Living Together
- Separated
- Arragned Marriage
Analysis
Contributing Factors:
- Cheating / Infidelity
- Financial Issues
- Domestic Conflict
- Money / Financial Gain
- Divorce / Separation
- Family pressure
Red Flags:
- Secretive communication patterns
- Financial secrecy
- Discovery of hidden calls or messages
- Deception after incident
- Suspects identified
- Secret affair
- Missing Victim
- Missing Suspect
- Divorce Pending / Recent Separation
- High-Conflict Household
Motives:
- Money / Financial Gain
- Escape marriage
- Eliminate spouse
- Extramarital relationship
- Desire for new relationship
Relationship Outcomes:
- Legal case ongoing
- Homicide during marriage
- Arrest made
- Weapon recovery
- Investigation still ongoing
- Deadbody recovery
Source Video
Video hosted by YouTube · Viewer discretion advised
People Link Graph
Hashem Disappearance Involving Mitra, Peyman, and others, Tehran, Tehrān, Iran
Relationship Journey Graph
Origin
- Family introduction
- Met on social media
How the relationship or connection began.
Status
- Married
Approximately 10 years (marriage)
Stages
- Dating
- Married Living Together
- Separated
- Arragned Marriage
Important relationship phases recorded for this case.
Warning Signals
- Secretive communication patterns
- Financial secrecy
- Discovery of hidden calls or messages
- Deception after incident
- Suspects identified
- Secret affair
- Missing Victim
- Missing Suspect
- Divorce Pending / Recent Separation
- High-Conflict Household
Reported red flags or early concern points.
Pressure Points
- Cheating / Infidelity
- Financial Issues
- Domestic Conflict
- Money / Financial Gain
- Divorce / Separation
- Family pressure
- Money / Financial Gain
- Escape marriage
- Eliminate spouse
- Extramarital relationship
- Desire for new relationship
Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.
Incident
2025-02-19
Outcome
- Legal case ongoing
- Homicide during marriage
- Arrest made
- Weapon recovery
- Investigation still ongoing
- Deadbody recovery
Recorded relationship or case outcome.
AI Intelligence Assessment
Relationship Pattern
Infidelity
Pattern Analysis
The reported relationship pathway began with a family-facilitated marriage that Mitra said she opposed from the start. The marriage was described as persistently conflictual, with disputes over divorce and Hashem's temporary wives. Mitra later developed a concealed affair with Peyman while still married, and the source alleged that the affair and financial pressure became connected to a plan to remove Hashem. The alleged homicide involved additional participants and conflicting accounts about who carried out the killing.
Investigative Notes
The victim's brother reported Hashem missing after Mitra said he had left for work and failed to return. Tehran Criminal Investigation Police reportedly placed Mitra under surveillance and arrested her as a primary suspect. Peyman later went to police, described an alleged abduction and body disposal, and was arrested. Amin and Farrokh were subsequently arrested. Police reportedly checked phone lines and messages linking Mitra and Peyman and found discussions about removing Hashem. Officers recovered a sack containing Hashem's body from the Kan River, and Mitra identified the body at the coroner's office. The three male suspects reportedly reconstructed their roles before judicial cameras and remained in custody pending court proceedings. The source did not report a conviction or final judgment.
Investigation Confusion
The suspects initially denied or minimized their roles and blamed one another. Peyman first said he left Hashem with Amin and Farrokh and was not involved in the killing; Amin said he only helped transport Hashem and later returned after being told the killing had occurred; Farrokh reportedly said all three men remained at the workshop and acted together. The source also alternates between the names Farhad and Farrokh. It was initially unclear who had carried out the killing, and Mitra denied knowing where Hashem was taken or how he died.
Case Reconstruction / Puzzle Pieces
According to the source, Hashem disappeared after a reported decade of marital conflict and an unresolved divorce dispute with Mitra. Mitra had become financially independent through digital marketing and reportedly wanted to leave Iran, while also developing a concealed affair with Peyman, who was married and under financial pressure. The source says Mitra later offered Peyman money to remove Hashem; Peyman allegedly recruited Amin and Farrokh, used information from Mitra about Hashem's morning routine, and lured him into a car by mentioning Mitra. Hashem was reportedly taken to Peyman's workshop, restrained, and killed with a rope, after which his body was placed in a sack and thrown into the Kan River. Phone records, messages, the body recovery, arrests, later confessions, and crime-scene reconstructions formed the reported basis of the investigation.
Risk Assessment
The source describes a high-risk combination of chronic marital conflict, an unresolved divorce, family pressure, concealed infidelity, secrecy, financial stress, alleged coercive relationship dynamics, and third-party recruitment. The reported use of a planned abduction, restraint, a knife, a rope, concealment of the body, and coordinated statements indicates serious escalation. Legal responsibility and the precise roles of each accused person remained subject to judicial proceedings.
Key Takeaways
The source illustrates how an unresolved marriage, family pressure against separation, repeated relationship conflict, concealed infidelity, and financial incentives can converge into a serious alleged offense. Important warning signs included a long-standing high-conflict household, secrecy around an affair, concealed communications, a missing spouse, recruitment of outsiders, and a planned movement to an isolated worksite. The account remains source-limited and includes conflicting statements, so it should not be treated as a final determination of individual guilt.
AI Case Q&A
What early signals mattered most?
The most significant reported early signals were Mitra's long-standing wish for divorce, Hashem's alleged refusal to agree, repeated household conflict, family pressure to remain married, the presence of temporary wives in the home, Mitra's concealed affair with Peyman, and messages reportedly discussing Hashem's removal.
Which clues helped connect the case?
The reported clues included the brother's missing-person report, the history of marital disputes, police surveillance of Mitra, Peyman's self-report to police, phone-line and message checks, the reported payment from Mitra to Peyman, recovery of the body from the Kan River, and later statements and crime-scene reconstructions by the accused men.
Which evidence types appeared strongest?
According to the source, the strongest reported evidence types were phone records and messages, the recovered body, the suspects' statements, the alleged money transfer, the missing-person timeline, and the judicially recorded crime-scene reconstructions. The source did not provide a forensic autopsy conclusion or detailed physical evidence findings.
Witness / Eyewitness Statements
Hashem's brother reportedly told police that Hashem had been missing for two days and had not returned from work. Peyman's wife reportedly discovered Mitra in the workshop after their son saw her in the rear room. Peyman, Amin, Farrokh, and Mitra gave conflicting accounts during interrogation. The source did not report an independent eyewitness to the killing.
How did follow-up reports change the understanding?
Follow-up investigation changed the case from a disappearance inquiry into a suspected homicide after Peyman approached police, phone records reportedly linked Mitra and Peyman, the body was recovered from the Kan River, and the accused men's accounts changed. Later reported confessions attributed the killing and disposal to all three men, although the source did not report a final court finding.
What remained unclear?
The source did not establish the final legal responsibility of Mitra, Peyman, Amin, or Farrokh. It remained unclear whether Mitra directly participated beyond the alleged planning and payment, which person inflicted the fatal injury at the workshop, the exact forensic cause and time of death, and the precise identity of the person referred to as Farhad or Farrokh in different passages.