← Back to India casesSharada Walkar and Anupama Gulati Allegedly Murdered by Aftab Poonawala, New Delhi, Delhi, India
Case Summary
Sharada Walkar, a Hindu woman in a live-in relationship with Muslim partner Aftab Poonawala, was reported missing after a history of alleged beatings, threats, and a withdrawn police complaint. According to the source, Poonawala later confessed that he strangled Walkar during an argument about marriage on May 18, 2022, dismembered her body, stored portions in a freezer, and disposed of them over time. Police reportedly found human remains in his apartment after detecting contradictions in his account. The case remained ongoing without a final verdict as of the source's publication.
Basic Information
Country: India
State/Province: Delhi, India
City/Region: New Delhi
Incident Type: Murder
Relationship Status: Live-in relationship
Relationship Duration: Approximately 1 year (dating, 2018-2019)
Affair / New-Partner Context
Recorded context: New relationship started
Reported initiator: Alleged suspect / offender
Relationship timing: Timing unclear / not reported
Incident Date: May 18, 2022
Relationship Journey
Relationship Origins:
- Friends circle
- Met on social media
- Dating app
Relationship Stages:
- Dating
- Living Together without Marriage
- Marriad First Lived Together then Separately
- Police report filed
Analysis
Contributing Factors:
- Domestic Violence Allegation
- Domestic Conflict
- Objection to the marriage
- Family pressure
- Interfaith/intercaste conflict
Red Flags:
- Secretive communication patterns
- Unusual closeness with a specific third person
- Financial secrecy
- Meeting people privately / hiddenly
- Deception after incident
- Escalation Pattern / Violence
- Secret affair
- Secret phone communication
- Missing Victim
- Threats
Motives:
- Fear of exposure
- Eliminate romantic partner
Relationship Outcomes:
- Legal case ongoing
- Homicide before marriage
- Weapon recovery
- Investigation still ongoing
- Deadbody recovery
Source Video
Video hosted by YouTube · Viewer discretion advised
People Link Graph
Sharada Walkar and Anupama Gulati Allegedly Murdered by Aftab Poonawala, New Delhi, Delhi, India
Relationship Journey Graph
Origin
- Friends circle
- Met on social media
- Dating app
How the relationship or connection began.
Status
- Live-in relationship
Approximately 1 year (dating, 2018-2019)
Stages
- Dating
- Living Together without Marriage
- Marriad First Lived Together then Separately
- Police report filed
Important relationship phases recorded for this case.
Warning Signals
- Secretive communication patterns
- Unusual closeness with a specific third person
- Financial secrecy
- Meeting people privately / hiddenly
- Deception after incident
- Escalation Pattern / Violence
- Secret affair
- Secret phone communication
- Missing Victim
- Threats
Reported red flags or early concern points.
Pressure Points
- Domestic Violence Allegation
- Domestic Conflict
- Objection to the marriage
- Family pressure
- Interfaith/intercaste conflict
- Fear of exposure
- Eliminate romantic partner
Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.
Incident
2022-05-18
Outcome
- Legal case ongoing
- Homicide before marriage
- Weapon recovery
- Investigation still ongoing
- Deadbody recovery
Recorded relationship or case outcome.
AI Intelligence Assessment
Relationship Pattern
Domestic Violence
Pattern Analysis
The reported relationship involved interfaith family opposition, cohabitation, alleged repeated physical violence, threats, and a withdrawn police complaint. The source links the fatal incident to a dispute about marriage and emphasizes contradictions between Aftab's account and reported purchasing, search, and disposal evidence. The account also describes concealment, financial transfers, and alleged involvement with other women after the homicide.
Investigative Notes
Police reportedly opened a missing-person investigation after Vikas Walkar reported that he had been unable to contact Sharada for months. Investigators questioned Aftab, noted contradictions, searched his apartment, and reportedly found human remains in a freezer and bone fragments in a blender. The source describes a confession, CCTV footage, purchase receipts, internet searches, alleged financial transfers, and continued court proceedings. It reports that Aftab remained under tight prison security and that no final verdict had been issued by publication.
Investigation Confusion
The chronology is internally inconsistent in the supplied report: it identifies the homicide as May 18, 2022 while also describes a missing-person report dated October 6, 2021 and says the homicide occurred seven months earlier. The source also presents conflicting accounts about whether the killing was spontaneous or planned, and it contains uncertain or malformed dates in references to other cases. The alleged religious-conversion theory was reported without supporting evidence.
Case Reconstruction / Puzzle Pieces
The source portrays Sharada and Aftab as partners who met on Bumble, dated, and later lived together in New Delhi despite family opposition to their interfaith relationship. Family and friends reportedly observed bruises, and Sharada allegedly told them that Aftab beat and threatened her; she filed a complaint in November 2020 but later withdrew it. After her disappearance was reported, Aftab allegedly gave contradictory explanations. Police reportedly searched his apartment, found human remains, and connected the case to his confession, prior threats, searches about concealment, refrigerator and knife purchases, CCTV footage, and alleged disposal activity.
Risk Assessment
The source describes a high-risk pattern involving alleged escalating violence, strangulation, threats to kill and dismember, coercive dependence, concealment, and a withdrawn complaint. The reported prior warning signs were serious, but the source does not establish every allegation independently or determine final criminal responsibility.
Key Takeaways
The source highlights prior alleged strangulation, repeated beatings, threats, social isolation, dependence on the abusive relationship, and withdrawal of a police complaint as major warning signs. It also illustrates how missing-person reporting, inconsistent suspect accounts, physical evidence, digital searches, purchase records, financial activity, and surveillance footage can connect a relationship history to a homicide investigation. Religious identity and family opposition were reported as contextual factors, but the alleged conversion motive remained unproven.
AI Case Q&A
What early signals mattered most?
The most significant reported early signals were repeated bruises, alleged beatings, threats to kill and dismember Sharada, coercive or blackmailing behavior, her unexplained withdrawal from family and friends, and the 2020 complaint that was later withdrawn.
Which clues helped connect the case?
Reportedly important clues included Aftab's contradictory statements, his anxiety around the refrigerator, human remains found in the apartment, bone fragments in a blender, CCTV footage of nighttime movement, internet searches about blood and body disposal, purchase receipts for the refrigerator and knives, and transfers from Sharada's bank account.
Which evidence types appeared strongest?
The source presents the alleged confession, physical remains, purchase records, digital search history, CCTV footage, the earlier police complaint, and financial-transfer records as the strongest evidence types. The legal weight and authentication of each item are not fully detailed in the supplied report.
Witness / Eyewitness Statements
Sharada's family and friends reportedly observed bruises and were told that Aftab beat her. Vikas reported that Sharada had been unreachable for months. Aftab allegedly told friends that Sharada had left after a fight and might be with another man. The source also reports police observations of Aftab's contradictions and behavior during the apartment search.
How did follow-up reports change the understanding?
Follow-up reporting changed the case from a missing-person inquiry to a suspected homicide after police identified contradictions in Aftab's account and reportedly found human remains. Later information about receipts and prior searches challenged the claim that the killing and concealment were entirely spontaneous. The final court outcome was not available in the source.
What remained unclear?
The supplied report leaves unresolved the exact chronology because of conflicting dates, the full circumstances surrounding the withdrawn complaint, the legal status of the confession and other evidence, the extent of family members' knowledge, and whether any religious-conversion motive existed. No final verdict was reported.