According to the video report, Hojatollah Rabani attacked his wife, Narges Taghavi Zand, in their Stockholm apartment in 2012 after repeated marital conflict, divorce requests, jealousy, and unproven suspicions that she had a lover. The report says he used a surgical scalpel to inflict severe facial and limb injuries, removed her lower lip, and chewed the severed tissue. Narges escaped, neighbors contacted police, and Rabani also called emergency services. Swedish proceedings reportedly classified the offense as aggravated assault rather than attempted murder, resulting in a five-year sentence that was later upheld on appeal.
Country: Sweden
State/Province: Stockholms län [SE-01], Sweden
City/Region: Stockholm
Incident Type: Attempted Murder
Relationship Status: Married
Relationship Duration: Approximately 6 years (marriage)
Recorded context: Romantic-rival / love-triangle context
Reported initiator: Unclear / not reported
Relationship timing: During marriage or ongoing partnership, before separation
Incident Date: May 22, 2012
Primary reported outcome: Attempted homicide or serious injury
Reported self-harm outcome: No suicide or attempt reported
Person(s) reported to have died by or attempted suicide: Hojatollah Rabani
Reported role: Alleged suspect / offender
Reported sequence: Order not reported / unclear
Additional victims reported: 0
Relationship Origins:
Relationship Stages:
Contributing Factors:
Red Flags:
Motives:
Relationship Outcomes:
Video hosted by YouTube · Viewer discretion advised
How the relationship or connection began.
Approximately 6 years (marriage)
Important relationship phases recorded for this case.
Reported red flags or early concern points.
Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.
2012-05-22
Recorded relationship or case outcome.
Domestic Violence
The reported pattern involved a rapidly deteriorating marriage, repeated requests for divorce, threats, controlling monitoring, jealousy, and unverified accusations of infidelity. The attack was described as punitive and revenge-driven rather than as an accidental escalation. The source also reports deliberate use of a surgical tool and alleged efforts to make the injury permanent.
Police reportedly arrested Rabani at the apartment after he cooperated and called emergency services. Narges underwent forensic examination and reconstructive treatment. The prosecutor sought an attempted-murder charge, while investigators and the court reportedly classified the conduct as aggravated assault because intent to kill was not established. Rabani received a five-year sentence, compensation was ordered, and an appeal seeking eight years was rejected. The source says he served approximately three years and four months and may have returned to Iran or been deported; that post-release detail is not fully confirmed.
The central dispute concerned whether Rabani intended to kill Narges or to permanently injure and punish her. Rabani gave conflicting accounts, initially describing revenge and permanent punishment, later minimizing the intended injury and denying that he had eaten the lip tissue. His allegations of Narges's affair were not established in the report. The source also contains inconsistent dates and descriptions of the final time served.
Rabani and Narges met at the Karolinska Institute while he was her professor and later married after Rabani's divorce from Farkhondeh. The report describes immigration-related leverage, a substantial age gap, emotional dissatisfaction, controlling behavior, repeated threats, and repeated divorce requests. Narges traveled to the Netherlands and later returned to Stockholm; Rabani interpreted her luggage, clothing, unanswered messages, and a parked car as evidence of an affair, although the source says this was unproven. During the following night, he allegedly obtained a scalpel, restrained Narges, cut her face and lower lip, and left her injured. She escaped, neighbors contacted police, Rabani called emergency services, and later court proceedings focused on intent, permanence of injury, and the appropriate charge.
The source describes high risk before the assault: repeated death threats, refusal to accept separation, intrusive monitoring, jealousy, suicidal thoughts, escalating arguments, and access to a surgical blade. The reported permanent disfigurement and later death threats indicate continuing safety concerns for Narges. The allegations and psychological interpretations remain source-limited and should not be treated as an independent clinical assessment.
The reported warning pattern includes threats during separation discussions, refusal to accept a partner's decision to leave, repeated surveillance-style calls, jealousy based on circumstantial observations, financial bargaining, and access to a sharp medical instrument. The case illustrates how coercive control and punishment-based thinking can escalate into severe permanent injury even when the offender claims not to have intended homicide. The source also highlights the importance of distinguishing verified evidence from unproven infidelity allegations and conflicting offender explanations.
The most important reported early signals were repeated divorce-related death threats, refusal to separate, hourly monitoring calls, controlling behavior, jealousy, escalating arguments, and Rabani's reported suicidal thoughts.
The reported clues included Narges's injuries, her account of the attack, blood at the apartment and in the hallway, cuts on her hands and face, the surgical blade, Rabani's statements, his emergency call, and neighbors' observations. The alleged lover and related affair theory were not established.
The strongest reported evidence types were forensic medical findings, Narges's testimony, Rabani's statements to police and the court, the physical injury pattern, the surgical blade, scene blood evidence, emergency-call information, and neighbor reports. The source also says reconstructive surgery could not fully restore the lower lip.
Narges reportedly described being restrained, threatened, cut, and seeing Rabani chew the severed lip tissue. Neighbors reportedly saw blood in the hallway and contacted police. Rabani reportedly told emergency services that he had injured his wife. Sirous and Farkhondeh reportedly defended Rabani's character. No independent witness reportedly confirmed the alleged affair.
Follow-up reporting changed the legal understanding from a prosecutor's attempted-murder request to an aggravated-assault classification. Later reports described permanent facial damage, extensive reconstructive treatment, a confirmed five-year sentence, release after approximately three years and four months, and Narges living under a protected or anonymous identity. Some reports about Rabani's return to Iran or deportation remained uncertain.
It remained unclear whether Rabani intended to kill Narges, whether she had an affair, the exact incident date, the precise legal and medical details behind the sentence, and whether Rabani returned to Iran or was deported. The source's psychological claims are not supported by a fully documented independent clinical record.