Ricardo Rincón, interviewed in Bogotá's La Modelo prison, says he was wrongly convicted and sentenced to 17 years for an alleged sexual offense involving his former partner's 11-year-old daughter. He describes a relationship that deteriorated amid jealousy involving his son's mother, a prior physical altercation witnessed by children, and separation. Rincón denies the charged conduct and cites his account of forensic findings, witness testimony, and a police officer's allegedly conflicting account. He also alleges that the arresting officer had a relationship with his former partner, but says the alleged communications were lost and never formally verified. The program states that justice convicted him in two instances and that journalists cannot declare him innocent.
Country: Colombia
State/Province: Distrito Capital de Bogotá, Colombia
City/Region: Bogotá
Incident Type: Non-Murder
Relationship Status: Separated
Relationship Duration:
Recorded context: Romantic-rival / love-triangle context
Reported initiator: Unclear / not reported
Relationship timing: During marriage or ongoing partnership, before separation
Incident Date: None
Relationship Origins:
Relationship Stages:
Contributing Factors:
Red Flags:
Motives:
Relationship Outcomes:
Video hosted by YouTube · Viewer discretion advised
How the relationship or connection began.
Important relationship phases recorded for this case.
Reported red flags or early concern points.
Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.
Recorded relationship or case outcome.
English labels are shown first. Original-language titles are preserved for source verification.
Conducta Delictiva - Colombia · Original language: Spanish
17 AÑOS en PRISIÓN por un Crimen que JURA NO Haber Cometido: ¿Culpable o Víctima de una Injusticia?
Jealousy
The reported relationship deteriorated amid jealousy concerning Rincón's continuing closeness with his son's mother and disputes about the former partner's conduct. Rincón describes a physical confrontation before the later sexual-abuse accusation, which he says followed separation and threats to ruin his life. The alleged police-officer relationship adds an unverified third-party conflict and possible investigative bias, but the source does not establish that allegation.
The program says Rincón was convicted in two instances and sentenced to 17 years for a sexual offense involving a minor. Rincón reports that the complainant's recorded testimony, his former partner's testimony, and an arresting police officer's testimony were used against him. He also reports that a forensic examination found no tears and that clothing and biological or fingerprint testing did not identify him, but these claims are presented through his account and are not independently documented in the supplied source. He alleges that the arresting officer had a relationship with his former partner, while acknowledging that the alleged messages were lost and never formally submitted as evidence. The current legal status beyond the reported conviction and his stated hope for eventual release is unclear.
The central uncertainty is the conflict between Rincón's denial and the reported statements of the minor, former partner, and police officer. Rincón disputes the officer's claim that he was caught in flagrante delicto and says the physical and forensic evidence favored him. He also alleges a relationship between the arresting officer and his former partner, but says the supposed screenshots and messages were lost, leaving the allegation uncorroborated. The program explicitly says journalists cannot declare him innocent despite his account.
Rincón says he met the unnamed former partner after helping arrange medical assistance for his mother, began dating her, moved into a shared household, and helped care for her children. Jealousy reportedly developed around his continuing relationship with his son's mother, followed by separation while the couple still worked and lived near one another. He describes a prior altercation in which he held the woman against a wall after alleging that she slapped him and his young son. On the later reported incident day, he says the former partner left and returned with police, after which he was arrested for alleged sexual access involving her daughter. The prosecution reportedly relied on the minor's recorded account, the former partner's testimony, and a police officer's testimony; Rincón disputes those accounts and alleges an undisclosed relationship between the officer and the former partner.
The source describes a high-conflict household, jealousy, separation, threats, a reported physical altercation witnessed by children, and a subsequent serious criminal accusation. These are significant relationship and legal-risk indicators, but the program is based substantially on Rincón's account and does not independently establish the alleged abuse, motive, police relationship, or evidentiary interpretation.
The source is useful for comparing cases involving relationship breakdown, jealousy, alleged threats, child-centered household conflict, and serious accusations arising after separation. A prior physical confrontation and statements such as an alleged threat to ruin Rincón's life are important escalation signals. The alleged police-officer relationship is an investigative lead rather than established fact because the reported communications were lost. The interview should not be treated as proof of innocence or guilt.
The most important reported early signals were jealousy involving Rincón's son's mother, deterioration of the shared relationship, continued cohabitation or workplace contact after separation, an alleged threat to ruin his life, and a physical altercation witnessed by children.
According to Rincón, the case was connected through the minor's recorded testimony, his former partner's account, and the arresting officer's testimony. He also points to the timing of the former partner's arrival with police, the officer's alleged claim that he caught Rincón in flagrante delicto, and forensic and clothing examinations that he says did not identify him.
The source reports a recorded child interview, witness testimony, police testimony, forensic medical examination, and testing of clothing for biological material or fingerprints. Rincón says the forensic findings showed no tears and that the testing was negative, but the supplied program does not provide original case records or independently verify those interpretations.
The minor reportedly stated during a recorded interview that Rincón pulled down her pants and underwear while the children were watching a movie. Rincón says his former partner gave a similar account and that the police officer said he caught him in flagrante delicto. Rincón also reports that the former partner's eldest son told her not to do it because Ricardo helped them. These statements are presented through the interview and are not independently assessed here.
The interview adds Rincón's account that the minor later attempted to recant, allegedly saying her mother told her what to say, but that prosecutors treated the initial statement as controlling. It also introduces the unverified allegation that the arresting officer and Rincón's former partner were in a relationship. The program does not provide independent follow-up confirming either development.
The supplied source does not establish whether the alleged sexual offense occurred, whether the former partner knowingly made a false accusation, whether the arresting officer had a relationship with her, or whether the reported forensic evidence was accurately characterized. The full court record, conviction details, appeal status, exact dates, identities of the minor and other witnesses, and current custody or release status remain unclear.