← Back to India casesSunita Sarawat Allegedly Murdered by Manjeet Sarawat, Anjal Gupta, and others, Sonipat
Case Summary
Sunita Sarawat, a 38-year-old government elementary-school teacher and mother of two, was shot multiple times at approximately 7 a.m. on October 29, 2018, while riding her motorcycle to work in Sonipat. The report states that her husband, Manjeet Sarawat, was having an affair with Anjal Gupta, whose reported birth name was Shashi Praba, and that the affair created pressure for Sunita to divorce. Sunita's diary reportedly documented threats, fear, marital conflict, and the affair. Police allegedly connected Manjeet and Anjal to a planned killing involving hired shooters. Manjeet reportedly confessed to hiring killers, Anjal denied involvement, and both were reported to have received life imprisonment sentences in 2025.
Basic Information
Country: India
State/Province: Haryana, India
City/Region: Sonipat
Incident Type: Murder
Relationship Status: Married
Relationship Duration: Approximately 3 years (marriage)
Affair / New-Partner Context
Recorded context: Affair started / overlapping relationship
Reported initiator: Alleged suspect / offender
Relationship timing: During marriage or ongoing partnership, before separation
Incident Date: Oct. 29, 2018
Relationship Journey
Relationship Origins:
- Family introduction
- Arranged marriage
- Childhood connection
Relationship Stages:
- Married Living Together
- Separated
Analysis
Contributing Factors:
- Cheating / Infidelity
- Financial Issues
- Domestic Violence Allegation
- Domestic Conflict
- Divorce / Separation
- Suspicion of infidelity
Red Flags:
- Financial secrecy
- Discovery of hidden calls or messages
- Deception after incident
- Escalation Pattern / Violence
- Suspects identified
- Secret affair
- Secret phone communication
- Threats
- High-Conflict Household
Motives:
- Money / Financial Gain
- Eliminate spouse
- Extramarital relationship
- Fear of exposure
- Desire for new relationship
Relationship Outcomes:
- Legal case ongoing
- Homicide during marriage
- Arrest made
- Investigation still ongoing
- Deadbody recovery
Source Video
Video hosted by YouTube · Viewer discretion advised
People Link Graph
Sunita Sarawat Allegedly Murdered by Manjeet Sarawat, Anjal Gupta, and others, Sonipat
Relationship Journey Graph
Origin
- Family introduction
- Arranged marriage
- Childhood connection
How the relationship or connection began.
Status
- Married
Approximately 3 years (marriage)
Stages
- Married Living Together
- Separated
Important relationship phases recorded for this case.
Warning Signals
- Financial secrecy
- Discovery of hidden calls or messages
- Deception after incident
- Escalation Pattern / Violence
- Suspects identified
- Secret affair
- Secret phone communication
- Threats
- High-Conflict Household
Reported red flags or early concern points.
Pressure Points
- Cheating / Infidelity
- Financial Issues
- Domestic Violence Allegation
- Domestic Conflict
- Divorce / Separation
- Suspicion of infidelity
- Money / Financial Gain
- Eliminate spouse
- Extramarital relationship
- Fear of exposure
- Desire for new relationship
Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.
Incident
2018-10-29
Outcome
- Legal case ongoing
- Homicide during marriage
- Arrest made
- Investigation still ongoing
- Deadbody recovery
Recorded relationship or case outcome.
Sources
English labels are shown first. Original-language titles are preserved for source verification.
Sunita Sarawat Allegedly Murdered by Manjeet Sarawat, Anjal Gupta, and others, Sonipat
elham kamyab99 - Iran · Original language: Persian
View original title
Murder of Sunita Sarawat in India
AI Intelligence Assessment
Relationship Pattern
Infidelity
Pattern Analysis
The reported pathway centers on an extramarital relationship that developed while Manjeet was married to Sunita. The affair was reportedly accompanied by hidden messages, pressure for divorce, threats, escalating marital conflict, and eventual alleged planning of a contract-style killing. Financial strain and the desire for a different relationship were described as additional relationship pressures.
Investigative Notes
Police reportedly found Sunita's diary in her bag at the crime scene, reviewed its account of threats and the affair, confronted Manjeet, and obtained his alleged confession that he hired killers. Anjal reportedly denied involvement, while the report says police monitored calls between her and Manjeet and concluded that she led the operation. The report states that Anjal and Manjeet were arrested and sentenced to life imprisonment in 2025, and that they continued communicating from prison. The supplied account does not provide court names, case numbers, statutory charges, judgment text, or independent corroboration.
Investigation Confusion
The source contains inconsistent names for the second alleged shooter: it first identifies him as Zaid Saifi and later as Shehzad Syed. It also alternates between Anjal and Angel, and uses uncertain or simplified descriptions of her family background and guardianship. The report presents confession, phone monitoring, and diary evidence as established but does not distinguish clearly between trial findings and narration.
Case Reconstruction / Puzzle Pieces
According to the report, Sunita and Manjeet were married and had two children while facing financial difficulties. Manjeet allegedly began an affair with Anjal after meeting her at a bar in 2016; hidden communications and pressure for divorce reportedly followed. Sunita's diary allegedly documented fear, threats, and attempts by her brother Vikram to ask Anjal to withdraw. In October 2018, Manjeet and Anjal allegedly involved Rajiv, his driver, and two recruited shooters in a plan to attack Sunita on her isolated morning route. Sunita was shot on October 29, 2018, transported to hospital by Sanjay, and pronounced dead. Police reportedly used the diary, Manjeet's confession, and monitored calls to connect the relationship conflict with the alleged killing.
Risk Assessment
The source describes a high-risk pattern involving alleged threats, concealed communications, coercive pressure to end a marriage, escalating conflict, third-party involvement, hired shooters, and a targeted attack during the victim's routine commute. These features indicate severe reported danger, although the account is a video report and some details are inconsistent or not independently verified in the supplied material.
Key Takeaways
The reported warning pattern includes an overlapping affair, hidden phone messages, demands for divorce, threats, family intervention, worsening arguments, and selection of a predictable isolated commute. The case illustrates how relationship conflict can expand into third-party facilitation and planned violence. The account is useful for pattern comparison but should be treated cautiously because it is a narrated video report with naming inconsistencies and limited primary-document detail.
AI Case Q&A
What early signals mattered most?
The early signals reportedly included Manjeet's secret messages and unexplained absences, Sunita's discovery of the affair, pressure to obtain a divorce, alleged threats from Manjeet and Anjal, and increasing marital arguments.
Which clues helped connect the case?
The reported clues were Sunita's diary, the documented relationship conflict, her account of threats, Manjeet's alleged confession, and monitored phone calls involving Manjeet and Anjal. The source also says the planned attack used a predictable route and recruited shooters.
Which evidence types appeared strongest?
The source presents the diary, Manjeet's alleged confession, monitored telephone calls, and the shooting scene as the strongest evidence types. It does not provide forensic reports, ballistic findings, surveillance footage, or court documents.
Witness / Eyewitness Statements
The report says people nearby approached Sunita after the shooting and that Sanjay transported her to the hospital. It also refers generally to colleagues describing Sunita as supportive, but no detailed eyewitness quotation or independent witness account is provided.
How did follow-up reports change the understanding?
The follow-up account changed the case from an apparently unexplained street shooting to an alleged relationship-related planned killing after police reportedly found Sunita's diary. Later reporting in the video states that Manjeet confessed, Anjal was arrested, both received life sentences in 2025, and they remained in contact in prison.
What remained unclear?
The supplied report does not resolve the identity discrepancy between Zaid Saifi and Shehzad Syed, the precise legal charges, the evidentiary basis for the reported life sentences, the identity of the driver, or whether all described allegations were confirmed in court. It also does not provide independent confirmation of the diary's contents, phone-monitoring process, or the exact roles of every alleged participant.