RelationWatch
← Back to India cases
OSINT Case File

Manisha Allegedly Murdered by Vivek Chauhan, Shikha, and others, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India

Case Summary

Manisha was reportedly killed in Noida on November 1, 2023, after years of alleged family abuse and conflict over an inheritance that her father had left equally to her and her brother Vivek. The source alleges that Vivek, his wife Shikha, and Shikha's boyfriend Pawan drugged, attacked, strangled, dismembered, and burned Manisha's body near Sisan village. Police reportedly connected the remains to Manisha through forensic examination, CCTV, phone-location data, witness accounts, and statements attributed to Vivek and Shikha. Shakti, Manisha's mother, was reported to have known about the plan and remained silent. The source states that the accused were awaiting trial.

Basic Information

Country: India

State/Province: Uttar Pradesh, India

City/Region: Noida

Incident Type: Murder

Relationship Status: Married

Relationship Duration:

Affair / New-Partner Context

Recorded context: Affair started / overlapping relationship

Reported initiator: Victim

Relationship timing: During marriage or ongoing partnership, before separation

Incident Date: Nov. 1, 2023

Incident Sequence and Additional Victims

Primary reported outcome: Homicide

Reported self-harm outcome: No suicide or attempt reported

Reported sequence: Order not reported / unclear

Additional victims reported: 0

Relationship Journey

Relationship Origins:

  • No data available.

Relationship Stages:

  • Married Living Together

Analysis

Contributing Factors:

  • Cheating / Infidelity
  • Financial Issues
  • Domestic Violence Allegation
  • Domestic Conflict
  • Family pressure
  • Honor/social pressure

Red Flags:

  • Unusual closeness with a specific third person
  • False accusations of infidelity
  • Deception after incident
  • Escalation Pattern / Violence
  • Suspects identified
  • Secret affair
  • Secret phone communication
  • Missing Victim
  • High-Conflict Household

Motives:

  • Money / Financial Gain
  • Extramarital relationship
  • Fear of exposure
  • Desire for new relationship
  • Property Gain

Relationship Outcomes:

  • Legal case ongoing
  • Homicide during marriage
  • Arrest made
  • Investigation still ongoing
  • Deadbody recovery
Primary source video

Source Video

elham kamyab99 - Iran

Manisha Allegedly Murdered by Vivek Chauhan, Shikha, and others, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India

Watch on YouTube ↗
Verified True
Confidence 4
Incident Date Nov. 1, 2023
Incident Type Murder

Video hosted by YouTube · Viewer discretion advised

People Link Graph

Manisha Allegedly Murdered by Vivek Chauhan, Shikha, and others, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India

Relationship Journey Graph

1

Origin

How the relationship or connection began.

2

Status

  • Married
3

Stages

  • Married Living Together

Important relationship phases recorded for this case.

4

Warning Signals

  • Unusual closeness with a specific third person
  • False accusations of infidelity
  • Deception after incident
  • Escalation Pattern / Violence
  • Suspects identified
  • Secret affair
  • Secret phone communication
  • Missing Victim
  • High-Conflict Household

Reported red flags or early concern points.

5

Pressure Points

  • Cheating / Infidelity
  • Financial Issues
  • Domestic Violence Allegation
  • Domestic Conflict
  • Family pressure
  • Honor/social pressure
  • Money / Financial Gain
  • Extramarital relationship
  • Fear of exposure
  • Desire for new relationship
  • Property Gain

Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.

6

Incident

2023-11-01

7

Outcome

  • Legal case ongoing
  • Homicide during marriage
  • Arrest made
  • Investigation still ongoing
  • Deadbody recovery

Recorded relationship or case outcome.

Sources

English labels are shown first. Original-language titles are preserved for source verification.

Manisha Allegedly Murdered by Vivek Chauhan, Shikha, and others, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India

elham kamyab99 - Iran · Original language: Persian

View original title

Murder of Manisha in an Indian family dispute over inheritance

AI Intelligence Assessment

Relationship Pattern

Financial Conflict and Infidelity

Pattern Analysis

The reported conflict centered on Manisha's equal inheritance rights and a long-standing pattern of alleged family exclusion, humiliation, and physical abuse. The source also describes Shikha's overlapping relationship with Pawan and alleged manipulation of both Pawan and Vivek. According to the report, inheritance pressure, fear of losing access to wealth, and fear of exposure converged in the alleged killing.

Investigative Notes

Police reportedly recovered partially burned female remains near a landfill close to Sisan village on November 1, 2023. Forensic examination identified the remains as female; CCTV reportedly showed three people using a silver car to dump and burn the body, and the vehicle owner said he had lent it to Pawan. A colleague and cousin reported Manisha missing after she failed to attend work on November 2. Neighbors reportedly described repeated arguments and alleged assaults. Phone-location data reportedly placed Vivek and Shikha near the disposal site. The source says Vivek and Shikha were arrested and attributed statements or confessions to them, after which Pawan was also arrested. The report states that the accused were awaiting trial and that no court proceeding had yet occurred.

Investigation Confusion

The remains were initially unidentified and too damaged for immediate identification. The family reportedly claimed that Manisha had left with a boyfriend, while neighbors described abuse and conflict in the home. The vehicle was initially linked to its registered owner, who said Pawan had borrowed it. The source also presents disputed allegations about the affair video and does not provide independent forensic or courtroom confirmation of every claimed confession.

Case Reconstruction / Puzzle Pieces

According to the source, Manisha's father left equal inheritance rights to his son and daughter, creating a long-running dispute after his death. Manisha reportedly resisted pressure to transfer her share and was subjected to alleged insults, isolation, and physical attacks by family members. Shikha allegedly became hostile after Manisha confronted her about Pawan and later used accusations against Manisha to intensify Vivek's resentment. The report alleges that Shikha, Vivek, and Pawan drugged and attacked Manisha on November 1, strangled her, transported and cut up the body, and burned it near Sisan. A passerby, forensic examination, CCTV, vehicle tracing, phone-location data, witness accounts, and reported suspect statements were used to connect the remains to Manisha and the household.

Risk Assessment

The source describes a high-risk household involving alleged chronic emotional and physical abuse, coercive inheritance pressure, repeated conflict, an overlapping affair, threats to expose the affair, and alleged premeditated violence. Reported indicators included a hostile family alliance against Manisha, escalating assaults, suspicious behavior after her disappearance, concealment efforts, and attempts to destroy the body. These are source-reported indicators and do not independently establish legal guilt.

Key Takeaways

The source illustrates how inheritance conflict, gendered family pressure, alleged domestic abuse, infidelity, and fear of exposure can reinforce one another. Important warning signs reportedly included chronic humiliation, physical assaults, family isolation, escalating disputes, an undisclosed romantic relationship, and efforts to shift blame onto the victim. The case also shows the investigative value of missing-person reports, workplace concern, neighbor accounts, CCTV, vehicle ownership records, phone-location data, and forensic examination.

AI Case Q&A

What early signals mattered most?

The most important reported early signals were Manisha's repeated exclusion and humiliation, pressure to surrender her inheritance, alleged physical assaults, frequent household arguments heard by neighbors, and Shikha's reported secret relationship with Pawan. Her unusual absence from work and switched-off phone later became a critical missing-person signal.

Which clues helped connect the case?

Reportedly useful clues included the partially burned female remains, CCTV showing a silver car and three people at the disposal site, the vehicle owner's statement that Pawan had borrowed the car, Manisha's absence from work, Sandy's report, neighbor accounts of conflict, phone-location data near Sisan, and statements attributed to Vivek and Shikha.

Which evidence types appeared strongest?

The strongest reported evidence types were forensic examination of the remains, CCTV footage, vehicle and license-plate information, mobile-phone location data, witness accounts from neighbors and relatives, the reported video involving Shikha and Pawan, and statements attributed to suspects. The source does not provide complete forensic reports or court-tested evidence.

Witness / Eyewitness Statements

An elderly passerby reportedly saw a fire and recognized that human remains were burning, then contacted police. Neighbors reportedly described frequent arguments and alleged attacks involving Manisha and Shikha. A colleague reportedly knew about Manisha's home difficulties and became concerned when she missed work. Sandy reportedly observed that Vivek appeared highly stressed and suspicious when asked about Manisha.

How did follow-up reports change the understanding?

The case reportedly shifted from an unidentified burned body to a missing-person and family-homicide investigation. The family's claim that Manisha had run away with a boyfriend was reportedly weakened by neighbor accounts, phone-location data, CCTV, and the connection to Pawan's borrowed car. The source then reported arrests and alleged admissions, but says the case remained pending trial.

What remained unclear?

The source does not establish the full forensic cause of death, the exact sequence of each participant's actions, the legal status of Shakti's alleged knowledge or involvement, the complete identity and role of the vehicle owner, or whether the reported confessions and motive evidence were accepted by a court. The article also does not provide a final verdict or sentence.

Add cases to private collections and export structured data. View plans

← Back to Home