On September 25, 2020, Amir, a 32-year-old restaurant owner in southern Tehran, died after being taken by ambulance to a hospital from Chitgar Park. Police-linked accounts and CCTV indicated that a young man left Amir's car and fled by motorcycle. About six hours later, Emad surrendered and reportedly confessed, saying he had confronted Amir over an alleged continuing relationship with Emad's wife, Sahar. Emad said he lost control after Amir allegedly told him to divorce Sahar so Amir could marry her. The source reports that Sahar confirmed Emad's account, both were imprisoned, Sahar received a prison and flogging sentence, and Emad was later spared retribution after obtaining the victim family's consent and received a seven-year sentence for the public aspect of the crime. Sahar was later released and filed for divorce.
Country: Iran
State/Province: Tehrān, Iran
City/Region: Tehran
Incident Type: Murder
Relationship Status: Married
Relationship Duration: Approximately 4 years (relationship)
Recorded context: Affair started / overlapping relationship
Reported initiator: Unclear / not reported
Relationship timing: During marriage or ongoing partnership, before separation
Incident Date: Sept. 25, 2020
Relationship Origins:
Relationship Stages:
Contributing Factors:
Red Flags:
Motives:
Relationship Outcomes:
Video hosted by YouTube · Viewer discretion advised
How the relationship or connection began.
Approximately 4 years (relationship)
Important relationship phases recorded for this case.
Reported red flags or early concern points.
Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.
2020-09-25
Recorded relationship or case outcome.
English labels are shown first. Original-language titles are preserved for source verification.
JenayiGRAM - Iran · Original language: English
Murder of Amir in Tehran involving a love triangle
Romantic Triangle
The reported conflict centered on an alleged affair between Sahar and Amir during Sahar's relationship with Emad and shortly after Emad and Sahar married. Emad described discovering hidden messages, receiving a promise that contact would end, and later finding that communications had continued. The confrontation escalated into a reported homicide after Amir allegedly proposed that Emad divorce Sahar so Amir could marry her.
Police were alerted by an officer at the hospital after Amir arrived by ambulance and died despite treatment. Investigators examined Chitgar Park, reviewed two cameras, tracked a fleeing man, collected family information, and received Emad's surrender approximately six hours after the incident. The source reports that Emad's statements were checked against materials associated with Sahar and Amir, Sahar was arrested and confirmed the account, and Emad reconstructed the incident. Sahar was sentenced to prison and flogging. Emad was sentenced to retribution after the victim family initially withheld consent, but in Shahrivar 1403, corresponding to August-September 2024, he obtained their consent and was sentenced to seven years for the public aspect of the crime. The source states that Emad remains imprisoned, Sahar has been released, and the divorce case is ongoing.
The initial investigation did not identify an obvious motive because Amir's parents said he had no known enemies or workplace disputes. CCTV showed a fleeing man but could not reveal the inside of Amir's tinted-windowed car. The relationship allegations initially came from Emad's confession and were later reported as confirmed by Sahar, but the source does not provide independent details about the physical evidence, the precise method of killing, or the full court reasoning.
Amir reportedly worked as a restaurant owner while Sahar worked at his restaurant. Emad said he and Sahar had met through a mutual friend, dated for approximately four years, became engaged after two years, and married shortly before the incident. Emad described finding messages between Sahar and Amir before the marriage, forgiving her after an apology, and later discovering photographs and continuing video communication after the wedding. After Sahar allegedly arranged a meeting with Amir, Emad went in her place, took her communication devices, entered Amir's car, confronted him, and reportedly lost control after Amir said Emad should divorce Sahar. Amir died after the encounter, Emad fled to a motorcycle, and then surrendered. Subsequent reported arrests, statements, reconstruction, and court proceedings connected the relationship conflict to the homicide investigation.
The source describes a high-risk combination of concealed romantic communication, repeated discovery of alleged infidelity, escalating anger, direct confrontation, access to the victim through a planned meeting, and unilateral retaliation. Emad reportedly expressed loss of control and used threats of police reporting before the fatal confrontation. The account is source-limited and does not independently establish every allegation or the precise method of killing.
The case illustrates how concealed communication, an alleged continuing affair, repeated breaches of trust, and unresolved marital conflict can create a dangerous escalation pathway. A prior discovery and apology did not resolve the underlying triangle, and the later confrontation was arranged outside formal legal or protective channels. The source also highlights the importance of distinguishing relationship allegations from independently verified evidence and of tracking legal outcomes separately from emotional explanations.
According to the source, the most important early signals were Sahar's increased phone secrecy, messages with Amir, alleged deception about the trip after the wedding, photographs showing Amir's presence, and renewed video communication after she had promised to end contact.
The reported clues included CCTV showing a man leaving Amir's car and fleeing toward a motorcycle, the obscured license plate, Emad's surrender and confession, communications and photographs reportedly found on Sahar's phone, and Sahar's reported confirmation of Emad's account.
The source presents the hospital and ambulance records, CCTV footage, phone messages and photographs, Emad's confession, Sahar's reported confirmation, the reconstruction at Chitgar Park, and court proceedings as the strongest evidence types. It does not provide a detailed forensic account or identify the exact weapon or medical cause of death.
Amir's parents reportedly said they knew of no one who had a reason to harm him and described him as well-liked by restaurant workers. Hospital staff reportedly described the failed medical efforts after his ambulance arrival. Police and investigators reported the CCTV movements and Emad's surrender. The source does not provide an independent eyewitness account of the confrontation inside the car.
Follow-up reporting changed the case from an apparently unexplained death with a fleeing suspect to a relationship-linked homicide after Emad surrendered and described the alleged affair and confrontation. Later proceedings added that Sahar reportedly confirmed the account, that both were imprisoned, and that Emad avoided retribution after obtaining the victim family's consent but remained imprisoned under a seven-year sentence.
The source does not clearly state the precise medical cause or method of Amir's death, the full forensic evidence, the exact sequence inside the car, or whether all details of Emad's account were independently corroborated. The initiator and full nature of Sahar and Amir's relationship remain unclear beyond the source's allegations and reported communications. The final status of the divorce and any later legal proceedings is also unresolved.