← Back to Iran casesAhmad Allegedly Murdered by Farshad and Marziyeh, Pasdaran, Tehrān, Iran
Case Summary
In Mordad 1396, corresponding to July-August 2017, Farshad, 48, called police in Tehran's Pasdaran neighborhood and reported that he had killed Ahmad, a 49-year-old man he said had been bothering his wife, Marziyeh. Police found Ahmad dead inside the couple's home, with severe injuries and decapitation. Farshad initially said Ahmad had an affair with Marziyeh and was threatening her with compromising videos. Marziyeh initially supported that account, alleging that Ahmad had sexually assaulted and blackmailed her. At trial, however, she changed her account and said she had met Ahmad while dissatisfied with Farshad, that Ahmad later coerced her sexually and threatened her with videos, and that Farshad planned the confrontation without telling her he intended to kill Ahmad. Farshad received a death sentence for retribution, while Marziyeh received seven years in prison. After Ahmad's family accepted two billion tomans and waived retribution, Farshad received an additional eight-year sentence for the public aspect of the crime. The source states that both Farshad and Marziyeh were in prison.
Basic Information
Country: Iran
State/Province: Tehrān, Iran
City/Region: Pasdaran
Incident Type: Murder
Relationship Status: Married
Relationship Duration: Many years
Affair / New-Partner Context
Recorded context: Affair started / overlapping relationship
Reported initiator: Unclear / not reported
Relationship timing: During marriage or ongoing partnership, before separation
Incident Date: July 29, 2017
Relationship Journey
Relationship Origins:
- Friends circle
- Met at shop or shopping mall
Relationship Stages:
- Dating
- Married Living Together
- Police report filed
Analysis
Contributing Factors:
- Cheating / Infidelity
- Domestic Violence Allegation
- Domestic Conflict
- Divorce / Separation
- Suspicion of infidelity
Red Flags:
- Secretive communication patterns
- Unusual closeness with a specific third person
- Discovery of hidden calls or messages
- Deception after incident
- Escalation Pattern / Violence
- Secret phone communication
- Threats
Motives:
- Revenge
- Extramarital relationship
- Jealousy
- Fear of exposure
Relationship Outcomes:
- Divorce finalized
- Legal case ongoing
- Homicide during marriage
- Arrest made
- Relationship ended
- Weapon recovery
- Deadbody recovery
Source Video
Video hosted by YouTube · Viewer discretion advised
People Link Graph
Ahmad Allegedly Murdered by Farshad and Marziyeh, Pasdaran, Tehrān, Iran
Relationship Journey Graph
Origin
- Friends circle
- Met at shop or shopping mall
How the relationship or connection began.
Status
- Married
Many years
Stages
- Dating
- Married Living Together
- Police report filed
Important relationship phases recorded for this case.
Warning Signals
- Secretive communication patterns
- Unusual closeness with a specific third person
- Discovery of hidden calls or messages
- Deception after incident
- Escalation Pattern / Violence
- Secret phone communication
- Threats
Reported red flags or early concern points.
Pressure Points
- Cheating / Infidelity
- Domestic Violence Allegation
- Domestic Conflict
- Divorce / Separation
- Suspicion of infidelity
- Revenge
- Extramarital relationship
- Jealousy
- Fear of exposure
Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.
Incident
2017-07-29
Outcome
- Divorce finalized
- Legal case ongoing
- Homicide during marriage
- Arrest made
- Relationship ended
- Weapon recovery
- Deadbody recovery
Recorded relationship or case outcome.
Sources
English labels are shown first. Original-language titles are preserved for source verification.
Ahmad Allegedly Murdered by Farshad and Marziyeh, Pasdaran, Tehrān, Iran
JenayiGRAM - Iran · Original language: Persian
View original title
Murder of a man named Ahmad by a man named Farshad
AI Intelligence Assessment
Relationship Pattern
Romantic Triangle
Pattern Analysis
The case involved a long-term marriage, suspected or admitted contact between the wife and Ahmad, allegations of sexual assault and blackmail, and escalating jealousy and confrontation. The accounts conflicted over whether Marziyeh willingly began a relationship with Ahmad, was initially deceived and assaulted, or was subsequently coerced through compromising videos. Farshad deliberately arranged for Ahmad to come to the home and then killed him, according to his own account and the prosecution narrative described by the source.
Investigative Notes
Police responded after Farshad called emergency services and found Ahmad dead inside the home. Farshad and Marziyeh were arrested at the scene; the crime scene was sealed, Ahmad's body underwent forensic and toxicology examination, and Ahmad's phone was examined for videos. Farshad and Marziyeh participated in a crime-scene reconstruction. The case was sent to the Tehran criminal court after a complaint by Ahmad's family. Farshad was sentenced to retribution and Marziyeh to seven years in prison; the source says the Supreme Court confirmed the sentences. Ahmad's family later accepted two billion tomans and waived retribution, after which Farshad received eight years in prison for the public aspect of the crime. The source states that both spouses were in prison.
Investigation Confusion
The principal uncertainty concerned Marziyeh's changing account. Initially, she supported the claim that Ahmad had assaulted and blackmailed her and that Farshad killed him in response. At trial, she said she had initially met Ahmad while dissatisfied with Farshad, that Ahmad later sexually assaulted and threatened her, and that Farshad planned the meeting and killing without fully disclosing his intention. The source does not independently resolve the conflicting accounts or establish the legal basis for Marziyeh's sentence.
Case Reconstruction / Puzzle Pieces
Farshad and Marziyeh had been married for many years and lived together in Pasdaran. Farshad reported discovering suspicious communications and a message threatening to release compromising videos. According to the initial account, Marziyeh had been coerced by Ahmad after an alleged sexual assault and repeated threats; according to her later trial account, she first developed contact with Ahmad while unhappy in her marriage and was later coerced by him. Farshad arranged for Marziyeh to bring Ahmad to the home, hid inside, attacked Ahmad with a metal bar, and decapitated him with a kitchen knife. He then called police, and subsequent phone examination, forensic work, interrogation, reconstruction, trial testimony, sentencing, and settlement shaped the reported case understanding.
Risk Assessment
The reported risk indicators included concealed communications, suspected infidelity, alleged sexual coercion and blackmail, emotional deterioration, conflicting relationship narratives, and a planned meeting that escalated to lethal violence. The source supports substantial escalation risk but does not provide a full history of prior physical violence or threats by Farshad before the killing.
Key Takeaways
The case illustrates how suspected infidelity, alleged sexual coercion, blackmail, secrecy, and marital dissatisfaction can combine into a high-risk confrontation. A planned private meeting created an opportunity for violence, while Farshad's immediate police call and lack of concealment contrasted with the severity of the alleged attack. The conflicting accounts show the importance of independently testing claims about consent, coercion, prior abuse, communications, and each participant's intent.
AI Case Q&A
What early signals mattered most?
The most important reported early signals were Marziyeh's changed mood and possible depressive symptoms, suspicious calls and messages, threats involving compromising videos, repeated alleged harassment by Ahmad, and escalating marital conflict. The source also describes a concealed or disputed relationship and a deliberately arranged meeting at the couple's home.
Which clues helped connect the case?
The reported clues connecting the case included Farshad's emergency call, the physical scene, the metal bar and kitchen knife, statements by Farshad and Marziyeh, the examination of Ahmad's phone, the alleged videos, forensic examination, and Farshad's crime-scene reconstruction. The later change in Marziyeh's account became important to understanding the disputed roles and motives.
Which evidence types appeared strongest?
The source presents the emergency call, the crime scene, Ahmad's phone, the alleged videos, forensic and toxicology examination, suspect interrogations, and the reconstruction as the strongest reported evidence types. The source does not provide detailed forensic findings or explain how each item was evaluated in court.
Witness / Eyewitness Statements
No independent eyewitness to the killing is reported. Farshad and Marziyeh provided accounts during interrogation and trial. Police reportedly observed the scene after Farshad's call, and Ahmad's family requested the harshest punishment.
How did follow-up reports change the understanding?
The understanding changed when Marziyeh withdrew her initial account at trial and said she had met Ahmad while dissatisfied with Farshad, had later been sexually coerced and threatened by Ahmad, and had not intended for Ahmad to be killed. The legal outcome also changed after Ahmad's family accepted compensation and waived retribution, leading to an eight-year sentence for Farshad's public-offense liability.
What remained unclear?
The source does not independently resolve whether Marziyeh's initial or trial account was accurate, the precise nature and consent circumstances of her contact with Ahmad, the full authenticity or chronology of the alleged videos, or the details supporting her seven-year sentence. The exact incident date and detailed forensic findings are also not reported.