← Back to Iran casesFaraz Allegedly Murdered by Elnaz, Shahram, and others, Tehran, Tehrān, Iran
Case Summary
Faraz, a 36-year-old man in Tehran, was reported missing by his father after his wife, Elnaz, claimed that he had left Iran for work in Turkey. Neighbors described years of escalating marital arguments, repeated departures and reconciliations, and the couple's sudden move without Faraz being seen. Investigators found that Faraz's phone last signaled from the marital home, identified an alleged affair between Elnaz and Shahram, and traced a deceptive call to Faraz's father to Shahram's friend Yashar. Elnaz and Shahram were arrested, confessed according to the report, and led investigators to Faraz's body. The report states that Shahram was identified as the principal cause of death, while Elnaz and Yashar were also convicted; the verdicts were pending Supreme Court review.
Basic Information
Country: Iran
State/Province: Tehrān, Iran
City/Region: Tehran
Incident Type: Domestic Violence Homicide
Relationship Status: Married
Relationship Duration:
Affair / New-Partner Context
Recorded context: Desire to replace or leave current partner
Reported initiator: Victim
Relationship timing: During marriage or ongoing partnership, before separation
Incident Date: June 16, 2024
Incident Sequence and Additional Victims
Primary reported outcome: Homicide
Reported self-harm outcome: No suicide or attempt reported
Reported sequence: Order not reported / unclear
Additional victims reported: 0
Relationship Journey
Relationship Origins:
- Arranged marriage
- Friends circle
- Met on social media
Relationship Stages:
- Married Living Together
- Police report filed
Analysis
Contributing Factors:
- Cheating / Infidelity
- Domestic Conflict
- Divorce / Separation
- Suspicion of infidelity
Red Flags:
- Secretive communication patterns
- Sudden change in routine or habits
- Deception after incident
- Escalation Pattern / Violence
- Suspects identified
- Secret affair
- Missing Victim
- High-Conflict Household
Motives:
- Eliminate spouse
- Extramarital relationship
- Fear of exposure
- Desire for new relationship
Relationship Outcomes:
- Legal case ongoing
- Homicide during marriage
- Arrest made
- Investigation still ongoing
- Deadbody recovery
Source Video
Video hosted by YouTube · Viewer discretion advised
People Link Graph
Faraz Allegedly Murdered by Elnaz, Shahram, and others, Tehran, Tehrān, Iran
Relationship Journey Graph
Origin
- Arranged marriage
- Friends circle
- Met on social media
How the relationship or connection began.
Status
- Married
Stages
- Married Living Together
- Police report filed
Important relationship phases recorded for this case.
Warning Signals
- Secretive communication patterns
- Sudden change in routine or habits
- Deception after incident
- Escalation Pattern / Violence
- Suspects identified
- Secret affair
- Missing Victim
- High-Conflict Household
Reported red flags or early concern points.
Pressure Points
- Cheating / Infidelity
- Domestic Conflict
- Divorce / Separation
- Suspicion of infidelity
- Eliminate spouse
- Extramarital relationship
- Fear of exposure
- Desire for new relationship
Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.
Incident
2024-06-16
Outcome
- Legal case ongoing
- Homicide during marriage
- Arrest made
- Investigation still ongoing
- Deadbody recovery
Recorded relationship or case outcome.
Sources
English labels are shown first. Original-language titles are preserved for source verification.
Faraz Allegedly Murdered by Elnaz, Shahram, and others, Tehran, Tehrān, Iran
JenayiGRAM - Iran · Original language: Persian
View original title
Disappearance and murder of Faraz involving his wife and another man
AI Intelligence Assessment
Relationship Pattern
Infidelity
Pattern Analysis
The reported pattern involved a deteriorating marriage, repeated high-conflict episodes, an extramarital relationship, and a plan to replace the existing marriage with a new partnership. According to the report, Elnaz and Shahram viewed Faraz's refusal to separate as an obstacle and allegedly planned his killing. Post-incident relocation, phone changes, and a misleading call were reported as efforts to conceal the disappearance.
Investigative Notes
Yaghoub reported Faraz missing to police in northern Tehran on 27 Khordad 1403. Investigators interviewed neighbors, reviewed building-camera information, obtained phone-registration data and bank-transaction inquiries, traced the last phone signal to the marital home, and linked the call to Faraz's father to Shahram's friend. Movers helped locate Elnaz and Shahram after the couple abruptly left their previous residence. The report states that both confessed and led investigators to Faraz's body. After reconstruction of the crime scene, Elnaz and Shahram were imprisoned. The report states that Shahram received qisas, Elnaz 15 years in prison, and Yashar three years for attempting to alter the course of the case; the verdicts were sent to the Supreme Court and were not final at publication.
Investigation Confusion
The initial explanation was that Faraz had independently left Iran for work in Turkey, supported by a caller using the name Kamal. That account conflicted with Faraz's known reluctance to migrate, his lack of contact with family, the absence of an active phone line, and the final phone signal from the marital home. The report leaves the identity and exact role of Kamal unclear and presents the defendants' confessions as the reported account rather than an independently verified complete reconstruction.
Case Reconstruction / Puzzle Pieces
Faraz's father reported an unusual 20-day loss of contact and challenged Elnaz's claim that Faraz had gone abroad. Neighbors supplied a history of escalating arguments, repeated suitcase departures by Elnaz, reconciliations, and a sudden move during which Faraz was not seen. Telecommunications information placed Faraz's phone at home before it was turned off, while other inquiries connected Elnaz to Shahram and the misleading call to Shahram's friend. Police located the relocated couple through moving-company information, and the report says their confessions led to recovery of Faraz's body and subsequent convictions pending final review.
Risk Assessment
The source describes a high-risk combination of chronic marital conflict, repeated separations and reconciliations, an undisclosed romantic attachment, pressure for divorce, alleged planning, and post-incident deception. These factors are associated with significant escalation risk in this case, but the source does not provide a complete history of prior physical violence, threats, weapons, or professional risk assessments.
Key Takeaways
The case illustrates how chronic domestic conflict, repeated unresolved separations, concealed romantic involvement, and pressure to end a marriage can combine into an acute risk pathway. The most useful comparison indicators are abrupt disappearance, a partner's implausible travel explanation, a phone becoming permanently inactive, sudden household relocation, concealment of a new relationship, and attempts to influence family understanding through an intermediary. These are source-based warning indicators and do not establish guilt outside the reported proceedings.
AI Case Q&A
What early signals mattered most?
The most important reported signals were years of loud marital arguments, repeated departures and reconciliations, Elnaz's emerging relationship with Shahram, Faraz's refusal to separate, the sudden cessation of household noise, Faraz's absence during the move, and the unexplained loss of his phone signal.
Which clues helped connect the case?
The case was reportedly connected through Yaghoub's skepticism, neighbor accounts, building-camera observations, the last phone signal from the marital home, the absence of another active phone line in Faraz's name, the connection between the caller and Shahram, and information from the moving team.
Which evidence types appeared strongest?
The strongest reported evidence types were telecommunications records, the phone's last signal location, neighbor observations, building-camera information, moving-company information, the call to Faraz's father, recovery of the body, forensic examination, crime-scene reconstruction, and the reported confessions. The article does not provide the full forensic findings or documentary exhibits.
Witness / Eyewitness Statements
Yaghoub reported that Faraz had never previously disappeared for 20 days and was unlikely to leave Iran without informing family. Neighbors reportedly described escalating arguments, Elnaz leaving with a suitcase, Faraz bringing her back, and the couple moving without Faraz being seen. Moving workers reportedly helped identify the couple's new residence. Yashar reportedly said he only made the call at Shahram's insistence and denied broader involvement.
How did follow-up reports change the understanding?
The understanding changed from a possible voluntary departure to a suspected homicide after neighbors described the sudden move and Faraz's absence, phone inquiries placed his last signal at home, and investigators linked the reassuring call to Shahram's friend. Later reported confessions and body recovery led to prosecution and sentences, although the Supreme Court had not issued a final ruling at publication.
What remained unclear?
The source does not provide the exact cause and method of death, the precise disposal location beyond outskirts of Tehran, full forensic findings, the independent evidentiary basis for each conviction, or the final Supreme Court outcome. Kamal's identity and exact role also remained unclear.