On December 2, 2024, Shahab, aged 23, went to his parents' apartment in Mashhad after his mother Sedigheh reported that his father Alireza had brought Atefeh, a woman with whom he allegedly had a relationship, into the home. According to the reported interrogation accounts, Sedigheh and her sons had monitored Alireza's communications and planned to confront the pair. Sedigheh allegedly provided Shahab with a pointed weapon, and Shahab cut the electricity before entering the apartment. Shahab admitted striking Alireza but said he intended to confront Atefeh and that the fatal injury occurred when Alireza moved toward him in the darkness. The case was reconstructed and sent to the criminal court. The trial had not occurred at the time of publication; Shahab and Sedigheh remained imprisoned, while Atefeh was released on bail.
Country: Iran
State/Province: Khorāsān-e Raẕavī, Iran
City/Region: Mashhad
Incident Type: Murder
Relationship Status: Married
Relationship Duration:
Recorded context: Affair started / overlapping relationship
Reported initiator: Alleged suspect / offender
Relationship timing: During marriage or ongoing partnership, before separation
Incident Date: Dec. 2, 2024
Primary reported outcome: Homicide
Reported self-harm outcome: No suicide or attempt reported
Reported sequence: Order not reported / unclear
Additional victims reported: 0
Relationship Origins:
Relationship Stages:
Contributing Factors:
Red Flags:
Motives:
Relationship Outcomes:
Video hosted by YouTube · Viewer discretion advised
How the relationship or connection began.
Important relationship phases recorded for this case.
Reported red flags or early concern points.
Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.
2024-12-02
Recorded relationship or case outcome.
English labels are shown first. Original-language titles are preserved for source verification.
JenayiGRAM - Iran · Original language: English
Family conflict and murder involving Shahab, Alireza, and Atefeh in Mashhad
Infidelity
The reported conflict centered on an alleged extramarital relationship, longstanding marital dissatisfaction, and resentment over Alireza's alleged emotional and financial involvement with Atefeh. Sedigheh and her sons reportedly monitored communications and planned to catch the pair, after which the confrontation escalated into a fatal incident. The accounts attribute different intentions and actions to Shahab and Sedigheh, and the legal responsibility remained unresolved because the trial had not occurred.
Police arrested Shahab at the apartment and preserved the scene before notifying the Mashhad criminal investigator. Shahab, Sedigheh, and Atefeh were questioned by Branch 255 of the Mashhad Public and Revolutionary Prosecutor's Office. The source reports admissions and accounts from Shahab and Sedigheh, a later scene reconstruction, referral of the completed case to the criminal court, and pretrial detention. No trial had been held by publication; Shahab and Sedigheh reportedly remained imprisoned, while Atefeh was released on bail.
Shahab said he intended to confront Atefeh and that Alireza was injured when he moved toward him in the darkness. The source also describes contradictory statements by Shahab and Sedigheh, disputed intent, and differing accounts about who possessed or supplied the weapon. The report does not provide an independent forensic reconstruction resolving these discrepancies.
The reported relationship pathway began with an unhappy marriage between Alireza and Sedigheh and Alireza's alleged secret relationship with Atefeh. Sedigheh and her sons reportedly discovered messages on Alireza's phone, noticed signs that Atefeh had visited the home, and developed a plan to catch the pair. On December 2, 2024, Sajad allegedly alerted Sedigheh that Alireza had brought Atefeh home. Sedigheh called Shahab, who arrived, allegedly took a pointed weapon, cut the electricity, and entered the apartment. Shahab admitted striking Alireza, who was later treated in the investigation as the homicide victim. Police detained those present, questioned them, reconstructed the scene, and referred the case for trial.
The source describes a high-risk combination of suspected infidelity, humiliation, chronic marital conflict, family surveillance, planned confrontation, access to a pointed weapon, and escalation inside a darkened home. Shahab's account disputed intent toward Alireza, while Sedigheh's account implicated herself in the confrontation plan. The source does not establish a final judicial finding or provide independent forensic conclusions.
The case illustrates how suspected infidelity, repeated humiliation, financial resentment, family involvement, and surveillance can combine into a planned confrontation. The reported decision to wait for a compromising situation and use a weapon created a serious escalation risk. The source is valuable for relationship-pattern comparison but remains allegation-based and lacks a trial judgment or independent forensic account.
The most important reported early signals were hidden messages, alleged financial transfers to Atefeh, repeated arguments and denials, signs that a woman had visited the home, increasing monitoring by family members, and Sedigheh's reported practice of carrying a pointed object when leaving the house.
Reported clues included messages found on Alireza's phone, alleged plans to transfer a car to Atefeh, changes noticed inside the apartment, a broken artificial nail, family surveillance of the home, the call from Sajad, and Shahab's admission that he cut the electricity and struck Alireza.
The source identifies interrogation statements, images of Alireza's body, phone messages, the preserved apartment scene, the reported weapon, witness-like observations by family members, and a later scene reconstruction. Their evidentiary weight was not independently assessed in the report.
Sajad reportedly alerted Sedigheh that Alireza had brought Atefeh into the home. Shahab and Sedigheh described hearing laughter and conversation from the apartment before the confrontation. The suspects' interrogation accounts were conflicting, and no independent eyewitness account was reported.
Follow-up investigation reportedly moved the case from the initial arrest of Shahab to questioning of three people present or connected to the scene, including Sedigheh and Atefeh. Later reports described a scene reconstruction and referral to criminal court. The trial had not yet occurred, so the final legal understanding remained unavailable.
The source did not resolve the exact mechanics of the injury, Shahab's intent toward Alireza, Sedigheh's precise role, the independent forensic findings, or whether Atefeh had any criminal responsibility. The report also did not state the final cause of death in medical terms or provide a court judgment.