According to the report, Nahid told police that her husband was missing, but CCTV allegedly showed two men taking him from the couple's home with his hands tied while Nahid drove a Peugeot. The report states that Nahid and Kaveh had maintained a secret affair for seven years and that Nahid asked Kaveh to remove her husband so they could live together. Police reportedly found the husband's body hours later near a shed west of Tehran. Nahid, Kaveh, and unnamed accomplices were awaiting trial according to the source.
Country: Iran
State/Province: Tehrān, Iran
City/Region: Tehran
Incident Type: Murder
Relationship Status: Married
Relationship Duration: Approximately 7 years (affair)
Recorded context: Desire to replace or leave current partner
Reported initiator: Unclear / not reported
Relationship timing: During marriage or ongoing partnership, before separation
Incident Date: Aug. 9, 2025
Relationship Origins:
Relationship Stages:
Contributing Factors:
Red Flags:
Motives:
Relationship Outcomes:
Video hosted by YouTube · Viewer discretion advised
How the relationship or connection began.
Approximately 7 years (affair)
Important relationship phases recorded for this case.
Reported red flags or early concern points.
Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.
2025-08-09
Recorded relationship or case outcome.
English labels are shown first. Original-language titles are preserved for source verification.
Criminal shadows پرونده جنایی ایرانی با شهدخت - Iran · Original language: English
Murder of Nahid's husband involving secret affair and kidnapping
Infidelity
The reported pattern centers on a long-term secret affair overlapping with both Nahid's marriage and Kaveh's marriage. The source describes persistent marital conflict, a stated desire to live with the affair partner, and an alleged plan to remove the husband rather than pursue divorce. The reported sequence then escalated from relationship conflict to drugging, restraint, forced removal, and homicide.
Police reportedly arrested Nahid after CCTV showed two men taking her restrained husband from the home while she drove. The report says Nahid initially described severe and worsening marital conflict and later disclosed the relationship with Kaveh. Kaveh and unnamed accomplices were reportedly implicated in planning and carrying out the removal. Police reportedly found the husband's body a few hours later near a shed west of Tehran. The report says trial proceedings were pending and that severe punishment or retribution was possible if the heirs did not forgive. Charges, convictions, forensic findings, and the precise cause of death are not provided.
The case reportedly began as a missing-person complaint by Nahid, but CCTV contradicted the account that her husband simply left and did not return. Nahid allegedly acknowledged driving the men to a location while claiming she did not know what happened to her husband. The source does not clarify the exact method of death, the identities or statements of the two men, or the extent of each accused person's legal involvement.
According to the report, Nahid and her husband had a visibly conflictual marriage, with neighbors allegedly hearing frequent arguments. Nahid had reportedly maintained a seven-year affair with Kaveh, whom she met through work, and allegedly asked him to remove her husband so they could live together. Kaveh allegedly instructed Nahid to put sleeping pills in the husband's drink, after which two men entered through an open door, restrained the victim, and placed him in a Peugeot driven by Nahid. Police used CCTV and later recovered the husband's body, connecting the disappearance report to an alleged coordinated homicide.
The source reports a high-risk combination of chronic household conflict, a concealed long-term affair, a proposed replacement relationship, alleged coordination with accomplices, drugging, restraint, and forced transport. These reported behaviors indicate serious escalation and deception risks, but the source does not establish the final legal responsibility of each accused person.
The source describes a relationship-driven homicide pathway involving prolonged infidelity, unresolved separation decisions, chronic domestic conflict, alleged concealment, third-party coordination, drugging, restraint, and forced transport. Important comparison signals include a concealed long-term affair, a stated desire to replace a spouse, frequent arguments known to neighbors, and a sudden transition from marital conflict to organized violence. The account remains source-limited and does not establish court-proven guilt.
The earliest reported signals were a seven-year secret affair, severe and worsening marital conflict, and frequent arguments reportedly heard by neighbors. The source also describes a desire to live with a new partner while not pursuing divorce.
CCTV footage reportedly showed two men entering the home, the husband leaving with his hands tied, and Nahid driving the Peugeot. Nahid's reported initial statements, the alleged affair with Kaveh, and the later recovery of the body reportedly connected the disappearance to a planned incident.
The strongest reported evidence types were CCTV footage, Nahid's reported statements or confession, the body recovery, and the reported physical circumstances of restraint and forced removal. The source does not provide forensic, toxicology, telephone, financial, or courtroom evidence.
The source says neighbors reportedly heard frequent arguments and knew the couple as constantly fighting. No direct eyewitness quotation or independent witness account of the removal is reported.
Follow-up police involvement reportedly changed the understanding from a husband who had simply gone missing to a suspected planned abduction and homicide. CCTV and body recovery reportedly shifted attention toward Nahid, Kaveh, and unnamed accomplices. Trial outcomes were not available in the source.
The husband's name, exact cause and time of death, the identities of the two accomplices, the full content and legal status of Nahid's statements, Kaveh's precise actions, forensic findings, formal charges, and trial outcomes remain unclear.