← Back to Iran casesSanaz, Salmaz, and others Murdered by Sirous, Tehran, Tehrān, Iran
Case Summary
On October 16, 2018, Sirous allegedly killed his two daughters, Sanaz and Salmaz, and his former wife's parents at his home in Tehran. The victims reportedly consumed a poisoned drink and were then stabbed while asleep. Sirous initially confessed, attributing the killings to marital conflict, alleged infidelity, anger toward his in-laws, prolonged sleep deprivation, and concern that his daughters would follow their mother's example. He later denied responsibility and claimed his former wife had access to the house. He was convicted, the judgment was upheld by Iran's Supreme Court, and the sentence was carried out in early 2023.
Basic Information
Country: Iran
State/Province: Tehrān, Iran
City/Region: Tehran
Incident Type: Family Homicide
Relationship Status: Divorced
Relationship Duration: Approximately 24 years (relationship before the incident)
Affair / New-Partner Context
Recorded context: Unclear / not reported
Reported initiator: Unclear / not reported
Relationship timing: Timing unclear / not reported
Incident Date: Oct. 16, 2018
Incident Sequence and Additional Victims
Primary reported outcome: Homicide
Reported self-harm outcome: No suicide or attempt reported
Reported sequence: Order not reported / unclear
Additional victims reported: 3
Additional victim events:
- Salmaz — Child; Killed; Order not reported / unclear
- Sanaz — Child; Killed; Order not reported / unclear
- Mohsen — Family or household member; Killed; Order not reported / unclear
Relationship Journey
Relationship Origins:
- Family introduction
- Arranged marriage
Relationship Stages:
- Married Living Together
- Separated
Analysis
Contributing Factors:
- Cheating / Infidelity
- Domestic Conflict
- Divorce / Separation
- Family pressure
- Suspicion of infidelity
Red Flags:
- Deception after incident
- Escalation Pattern / Violence
- Suspects identified
- Secret affair
- Manipulative behavior
- Threats
- Stalking / Repeated Harassment
- High-Conflict Household
Motives:
- Revenge
- Jealousy
Relationship Outcomes:
- Divorce finalized
- Legal case ongoing
- Homicide before divorce
- Homicide during marriage
- Arrest made
- Investigation still ongoing
- Deadbody recovery
Source Video
Video hosted by YouTube · Viewer discretion advised
People Link Graph
Sanaz, Salmaz, and others Murdered by Sirous, Tehran, Tehrān, Iran
Relationship Journey Graph
Origin
- Family introduction
- Arranged marriage
How the relationship or connection began.
Status
- Divorced
Approximately 24 years (relationship before the incident)
Stages
- Married Living Together
- Separated
Important relationship phases recorded for this case.
Warning Signals
- Deception after incident
- Escalation Pattern / Violence
- Suspects identified
- Secret affair
- Manipulative behavior
- Threats
- Stalking / Repeated Harassment
- High-Conflict Household
Reported red flags or early concern points.
Pressure Points
- Cheating / Infidelity
- Domestic Conflict
- Divorce / Separation
- Family pressure
- Suspicion of infidelity
- Revenge
- Jealousy
Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.
Incident
2018-10-16
Outcome
- Divorce finalized
- Legal case ongoing
- Homicide before divorce
- Homicide during marriage
- Arrest made
- Investigation still ongoing
- Deadbody recovery
Recorded relationship or case outcome.
Sources
English labels are shown first. Original-language titles are preserved for source verification.
Sanaz, Salmaz, and others Murdered by Sirous, Tehran, Tehrān, Iran
JenayiGRAM - Iran · Original language: Persian
View original title
ق..ت.ل ترسناک ۴ عضو یک خانواده در تهران...
AI Intelligence Assessment
Relationship Pattern
Domestic Violence
Pattern Analysis
The source describes a prolonged high-conflict relationship involving separation, renewed cohabitation, controlling behavior, repeated arguments, and alleged harassment after Farideh left. Sirous reportedly interpreted an unverified infidelity claim as confirmation of betrayal and blamed Farideh's parents for the relationship breakdown. The reported killings extended the conflict to the couple's daughters and in-laws.
Investigative Notes
Police were called after Sirous's brother reported the deaths. Officers found four bodies and forensic personnel reportedly identified stab wounds. Sirous surrendered or was found after the incident, was taken to hospital, underwent forensic psychological evaluation, and was then transferred to prison. An indictment was issued, the Tehran Province Criminal Court sentenced him to blood money and execution, the Supreme Court confirmed the judgment, and the sentence was carried out in early 2023. The source does not provide the full forensic, toxicological, or documentary evidence.
Investigation Confusion
Sirous initially confessed in detail, including a claimed poisoning and stabbing sequence, but later denied being the killer and said he had falsely confessed to be with his children. The source also presents conflicting accounts about Farideh's alleged relationship with another man and whether her parents contributed to the marital conflict. The transcript contains naming and translation ambiguities concerning the grandparents and the person identified as Mohsen.
Case Reconstruction / Puzzle Pieces
The case appears to have developed from a long-term marriage into separation and renewed cohabitation marked by control, conflict, and family involvement. After Farideh left, Sirous reportedly became increasingly focused on locating her and on an allegation that she had another relationship. He arranged for her parents to stay at his home, where the four victims were later found dead. His initial account described a deliberate sequence after poisoning, while his later court testimony denied the killings; the court nevertheless convicted him and the sentence was carried out.
Risk Assessment
The source describes substantial escalation indicators: separation, controlling conduct, repeated unwanted contact, threats or intimidating messages, family isolation, fixation on alleged infidelity, severe sleep deprivation, and access to multiple victims in a household. The account is disputed because Sirous later withdrew his confession and alleged another explanation. The reported conviction and execution indicate the legal system ultimately accepted the prosecution case, but the source does not provide the complete evidentiary record.
Key Takeaways
The case illustrates how separation, coercive relationship dynamics, repeated contact, alleged infidelity narratives, family blame, threats, and escalating emotional dysregulation can converge around a household with multiple vulnerable people. The source also shows the importance of distinguishing an initial confession from a later denial and of checking claims against forensic, digital, witness, and scene evidence. Several details remain source-limited or translation-uncertain.
AI Case Q&A
What early signals mattered most?
The most important reported early signals were repeated marital conflict, Farideh leaving the home, Sirous's repeated calls and visits, controlling behavior, use of the daughters to bring Farideh back, intimidating messages, and fixation on an unverified infidelity allegation.
Which clues helped connect the case?
The reported clues included the brother's emergency call, the bodies found in separate rooms, forensic findings of stab wounds, Sirous's initial confession, his presence or vehicle near the home, his later contradictory account, family members' statements, and the timeline of calls and messages.
Which evidence types appeared strongest?
The source identifies the crime scene, recovered bodies, forensic examination, reported stab wounds, Sirous's initial confession, his later denial, witness accounts from Bahram and other family members, and court records. It does not provide detailed toxicology, weapon recovery, digital-message records, or the complete trial evidence.
Witness / Eyewitness Statements
Sirous's brother reportedly called police and later described discovering the scene. Bahram said Farideh had left because of Sirous's behavior, that Sirous repeatedly contacted him, and that Farideh had been staying at his home. Neighbors reportedly reacted after hearing police sirens. Farideh and other relatives requested punishment and disputed Sirous's characterization of the family conflict.
How did follow-up reports change the understanding?
Follow-up reporting changed the case from an initial confession-based account to a disputed courtroom narrative after Sirous denied responsibility. Bahram's testimony challenged the claims that the in-laws caused the conflict and that Farideh was involved with another man. The later legal outcome reported by the source was conviction, Supreme Court confirmation, and execution.
What remained unclear?
The source leaves unclear the complete forensic basis for the conviction, the exact role of poisoning versus stabbing, the identity of the person called Mohsen, the precise status of Farideh and Sirous at the incident date, and whether the alleged third-party relationship existed. Sirous's later denial and the full evidentiary response to it are not explained in detail.