← Back to Iran casesHanieh Moradi, Mina Karimi, and others Disappearance Involving Mojtaba Hemtiyar, Karaj
Case Summary
The source reports that engineer and construction-company owner Mojtaba Hemtiyar was accused of forcibly sexually assaulting employee Mohaddeseh in 2018, after which the case was initially closed. In August 2024, employees Hanieh Moradi and Mina Karimi disappeared from Hemtiyar's workplace in Karaj. Police reportedly found cleaned blood traces, conflicting surveillance evidence, digital and physical evidence, and later described a confession in which Hemtiyar allegedly admitted sexually assaulting both women and causing Hanieh's death before killing Mina to conceal the crimes. Their bodies were reportedly never recovered. At a June 10, 2025 hearing, prosecutors presented charges involving rape, two intentional killings, concealment of bodies, destruction of evidence, and the reopened 2018 assault case. The source says the court issued three death sentences, although Hemtiyar denied some allegations and claimed the sexual activity was consensual.
Basic Information
Country: Iran
State/Province: None
City/Region: Karaj
Incident Type: Murder
Relationship Status: Unknown
Relationship Duration:
Incident Date: Aug. 12, 2024
Incident Sequence and Additional Victims
Primary reported outcome: Homicide
Reported self-harm outcome: No suicide or attempt reported
Reported sequence: Order not reported / unclear
Additional victims reported: 1
Additional victim events:
- Mina Karimi — Other third party; Killed; After self-harm
Relationship Journey
Relationship Origins:
- Met at Workplace
Relationship Stages:
- No data available.
Analysis
Contributing Factors:
- Financial Issues
- Domestic Violence Allegation
- Drugs / Alchohol Use
- Domestic Conflict
Red Flags:
- Secretive communication patterns
- Deception after incident
- Escalation Pattern / Violence
- Suspects identified
- Manipulative behavior
- Missing Victim
- Threats
- High-Conflict Household
Motives:
- No data available.
Relationship Outcomes:
- Divorce filed
- Legal case ongoing
- Missing
- Investigation still ongoing
Source Video
Video hosted by YouTube · Viewer discretion advised
People Link Graph
Hanieh Moradi, Mina Karimi, and others Disappearance Involving Mojtaba Hemtiyar, Karaj
Relationship Journey Graph
Origin
- Met at Workplace
How the relationship or connection began.
Status
- Unknown
Stages
Important relationship phases recorded for this case.
Warning Signals
- Secretive communication patterns
- Deception after incident
- Escalation Pattern / Violence
- Suspects identified
- Manipulative behavior
- Missing Victim
- Threats
- High-Conflict Household
Reported red flags or early concern points.
Pressure Points
- Financial Issues
- Domestic Violence Allegation
- Drugs / Alchohol Use
- Domestic Conflict
Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.
Incident
2024-08-12
Outcome
- Divorce filed
- Legal case ongoing
- Missing
- Investigation still ongoing
Recorded relationship or case outcome.
Sources
English labels are shown first. Original-language titles are preserved for source verification.
Hanieh Moradi, Mina Karimi, and others Disappearance Involving Mojtaba Hemtiyar, Karaj
CommisrTube I کمیسر تیوب - Iran · Original language: Persian
View original title
راز دست درازی فاش شد: دادگاه حکم ترسناکی صادر کرد😱🤯Criminal case murder and rape
AI Intelligence Assessment
Relationship Pattern
Unknown
Pattern Analysis
The source describes a workplace power-abuse and sexual-violence pattern rather than a primarily romantic or family relationship conflict. Hemtiyar allegedly used employer authority, a closed workplace, apparent respectability, and control over workplace systems in incidents involving female employees. Reported prior allegations, later disappearances, physical traces, and the prosecution's claimed similarities were used to connect the cases.
Investigative Notes
Police reportedly investigated the 2018 complaint, forensic findings, disabled CCTV systems, a missing phone, workplace surveillance, city cameras, GPS data, blood traces, worker testimony, burnt SIM cards, and a construction site where remains were allegedly concealed. Hemtiyar was reportedly detained, charged, and tried in Alborz Province Criminal Court on June 10, 2025. The source says the court issued three death sentences and that he was held in Alborz prison. The source also says the 2018 case was reopened and other possible victims or accomplices were considered. This case does not appear to be primarily relationship-driven; the central reported dynamics are workplace authority, sexual violence, alleged homicide, and evidence concealment.
Investigation Confusion
The 2018 rape case was reportedly closed for insufficient evidence and later reopened. Hemtiyar initially denied involvement in the 2024 disappearances, claimed the women left the office voluntarily, and later allegedly confessed during interrogation. At trial, he partially admitted some conduct but denied intentional killing and claimed consensual sexual activity. The bodies were reportedly never recovered, creating continuing evidentiary limitations despite the reported confessions and physical evidence.
Case Reconstruction / Puzzle Pieces
According to the source, Mohaddeseh reported a violent workplace sexual assault in January 2019, and forensic examination documented multiple injuries. Investigators reportedly found that the office CCTV system had been disabled and that Hemtiyar's phone was missing, but the case was initially closed. On August 12, 2024, Hanieh and Mina were reportedly last seen at Hemtiyar's office, while their phones were turned off and external cameras did not show them leaving. Police then reportedly found cleaned blood traces and other suspicious evidence, followed by an alleged confession describing sexual assault, Hanieh's death during an assault, Mina's later killing, and concealment at a construction site. Prosecutors later connected the 2018 complaint to the newer case through alleged similarities, forensic evidence, witness accounts, GPS data, and evidence-destruction allegations.
Risk Assessment
The source describes substantial reported risk indicators, including alleged prior sexual violence, unwanted touching and calls, threats or pressure, workplace power imbalance, surveillance disruption, phone confiscation, alleged substance use, cleaned blood traces, and concealment of remains. The allegations and court outcome should be distinguished from independently verified facts because the source contains conflicting accounts and the bodies were reportedly not recovered.
Key Takeaways
The source highlights the importance of taking workplace sexual-assault complaints seriously, documenting injuries promptly, preserving digital evidence, investigating surveillance interruptions, and examining repeated allegations for pattern similarities. It also illustrates how employer authority, financial dependence, isolation, and apparent social respectability may complicate reporting. The source's account remains limited by conflicting testimony, disputed consent claims, untranslated legal context, and the reported absence of recovered bodies.
AI Case Q&A
What early signals mattered most?
The source identifies alleged late-night calls, harassing compliments, unwanted touching, sexualized looks, prior complaints, claimed controlling behavior in former marriages, and the disabling of workplace cameras as important warning signs. These are reported allegations and should not be treated as independently verified findings.
Which clues helped connect the case?
Reportedly important clues included the victims' last known presence at the office, phones being turned off, external cameras showing no departure, cleaned blood traces, GPS data, burnt SIM cards, worker testimony, the alleged confession, and similarities with the 2018 complaint.
Which evidence types appeared strongest?
The source presents forensic medical findings from the 2018 complaint, workplace and city-camera records, digital and GPS evidence, physical traces, worker testimony, reports concerning burnt SIM cards, alleged confessions, and the construction-site investigation as key evidence types. The absence of recovered bodies remained a major limitation.
Witness / Eyewitness Statements
Zohreh reportedly told police that Mohaddeseh came to her late at night crying and bleeding and accused her employer of rape. Families reportedly said Hanieh and Mina's phones were turned off and that they could not reach Hemtiyar. Workers reportedly testified about the construction site, while Hemtiyar gave conflicting accounts, including an initial denial, an alleged interrogation confession, and later partial admissions with a disputed consent claim.
How did follow-up reports change the understanding?
The case understanding reportedly changed after two employees disappeared in 2024. Their disappearance led investigators back to the previously closed 2018 complaint, and the source says new physical, digital, testimonial, and confession evidence resulted in the older case being reopened. The later court hearing added formal charges and a reported death sentence.
What remained unclear?
The source does not establish independent confirmation of every alleged confession or the precise forensic cause of death. The bodies of Hanieh and Mina were reportedly never recovered. The extent of any colleague involvement, the existence of additional victims, the exact legal status of the death sentences, and the disputed consent claims remain unclear from the source.