RelationWatch
← Back to United States cases
OSINT Case File

Susan Roshel and Caroline Roshel Injured in Alleged Murder Attempt by Michael Roshel, Naplesville, Florida, United States

Case Summary

Michael Roshel, a wealthy businessman in Naplesville, Florida, was convicted of attempted murder against his wife Susan Roshel following a violent altercation in their home. The couple's marriage was marked by tension, jealousy, and domestic violence, including previous physical fights and Susan's arrest for attacking Michael with a knife. On February 3, 2018, Michael claimed an unknown masked intruder attacked them, but police investigations and security footage disproved this, revealing the attack was domestic. Michael was found guilty of attempted murder, evidence tampering, failure to provide medical assistance, and witness intimidation, and sentenced to 30 years in prison. The case exposed deep marital conflicts, jealousy involving Michael's daughter Caroline, and a failed attempt by Michael to cover up the crime.

Basic Information

Country: United States

State/Province: Florida, United States

City/Region: Naplesville

Incident Type: Attempted Murder

Relationship Status: Married

Relationship Duration: Approximately 11 years (marriage)

Incident Date: Feb. 3, 2018

Incident Sequence and Additional Victims

Primary reported outcome: Attempted homicide or serious injury

Reported self-harm outcome: No suicide or attempt reported

Person(s) reported to have died by or attempted suicide: Susan Roshel

Reported sequence: Order not reported / unclear

Relationship Journey

Relationship Origins:

  • Met online / Email / Website
  • Family introduction
  • Childhood connection

Relationship Stages:

  • Married Living Together

Analysis

Contributing Factors:

  • Domestic Violence Allegation
  • Domestic Conflict
  • Divorce / Separation
  • Family pressure
  • Suspicion of infidelity

Red Flags:

  • False accusations of infidelity
  • Discovery of suspicious emails
  • Deception after incident
  • Escalation Pattern / Violence
  • Manipulative behavior
  • Threats
  • Alcohol Abuse
  • Divorce Pending / Recent Separation

Motives:

  • Revenge
  • Avoid divorce settlement
  • Jealousy
  • Eliminate romantic partner

Relationship Outcomes:

  • Divorce filed
  • Legal case ongoing
  • Arrest made
  • Investigation still ongoing
Primary source video

Source Video

MR POARO - Iran

Susan Roshel and Caroline Roshel Injured in Alleged Murder Attempt by Michael Roshel, Naplesville, Florida, United States

Watch on YouTube ↗
Verified True
Confidence 3
Incident Date Feb. 3, 2018
Incident Type Attempted Murder

Video hosted by YouTube · Viewer discretion advised

People Link Graph

Susan Roshel and Caroline Roshel Injured in Alleged Murder Attempt by Michael Roshel, Naplesville, Florida, United States

Relationship Journey Graph

1

Origin

  • Met online / Email / Website
  • Family introduction
  • Childhood connection

How the relationship or connection began.

2

Status

  • Married

Approximately 11 years (marriage)

3

Stages

  • Married Living Together

Important relationship phases recorded for this case.

4

Warning Signals

  • False accusations of infidelity
  • Discovery of suspicious emails
  • Deception after incident
  • Escalation Pattern / Violence
  • Manipulative behavior
  • Threats
  • Alcohol Abuse
  • Divorce Pending / Recent Separation

Reported red flags or early concern points.

5

Pressure Points

  • Domestic Violence Allegation
  • Domestic Conflict
  • Divorce / Separation
  • Family pressure
  • Suspicion of infidelity
  • Revenge
  • Avoid divorce settlement
  • Jealousy
  • Eliminate romantic partner

Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.

6

Incident

2018-02-03

7

Outcome

  • Divorce filed
  • Legal case ongoing
  • Arrest made
  • Investigation still ongoing

Recorded relationship or case outcome.

AI Intelligence Assessment

Relationship Pattern

Domestic Violence

Pattern Analysis

The case reveals a pattern of escalating domestic violence within a marriage marked by jealousy, control, and financial disputes. The suspect attempted to conceal the crime by fabricating a story of an intruder and tampering with evidence. The involvement of family members and tensions over financial matters intensified the conflict.

Investigative Notes

Police disproved the intruder story through security footage and forensic evidence. The suspect was arrested and charged with attempted murder and related offenses. The forensic expert for the defense was discredited due to prior ethical violations. The case involved detailed witness and expert testimonies, with the jury convicting the suspect and sentencing him to 30 years imprisonment.

Investigation Confusion

Initial confusion arose from the suspect's fabricated story of a masked intruder and deleted security footage. Contradictory timelines and injury accounts complicated the investigation. The defense's forensic expert's credibility was questioned, adding complexity to the trial.

Case Reconstruction / Puzzle Pieces

The couple's longstanding marital tensions, including jealousy and financial disputes, culminated in a violent altercation on February 3, 2018. Michael attacked Susan with a knife, then attempted to cover up the crime by inventing an intruder story and deleting evidence. Police investigation and forensic analysis revealed the truth, leading to Michael's arrest and conviction.

Risk Assessment

High risk due to history of physical violence, jealousy, and controlling behavior. The suspect's attempts to manipulate the investigation and evidence indicate a dangerous escalation.

Key Takeaways

Domestic violence can escalate despite outward appearances of wealth and success. Jealousy and financial disputes are common triggers. Attempts to fabricate evidence and manipulate investigations are red flags. Early intervention in domestic conflicts is critical to prevent escalation.

AI Case Q&A

What early signals mattered most?

Repeated physical fights, jealousy toward stepchildren, excessive alcohol use, and controlling behavior were early warning signs.

Which clues helped connect the case?

Security footage showing separate arrivals home, forensic blood spatter analysis, and injury photographs helped connect the case.

Which evidence types appeared strongest?

Security camera footage, forensic blood pattern analysis, injury photographs, and witness testimonies were strongest evidence.

Witness / Eyewitness Statements

Not reported.

How did follow-up reports change the understanding?

No follow-up reports beyond trial and sentencing were available.

What remained unclear?

Exact sequence of the struggle and timing discrepancies between parties remain partially unclear.

Add cases to private folders and export structured data. View plans

← Back to Home