RelationWatch
OSINT Case File

Manjit Mishra Allegedly Murdered by Sachin Rathore and Pramod, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India

Case Summary

On February 21, 2025, 29-year-old bank data manager Manjit Mishra was shot and killed near his office in Greater Noida West, Uttar Pradesh, India. Attackers on a motorcycle intentionally bumped into his car, causing him to step out, whereupon they shot him in the head. Manjit had married Megha Rathore in January 2024 after an eight-year relationship that faced strong family opposition over caste differences. The marriage dissolved into conflict, leading to separation in June 2024, multiple legal filings, and court mediation where Megha's side allegedly demanded Rs 1 crore in alimony. Following the refusal of the financial demand, Megha's brother, Sachin Rathore, allegedly hired shooters for Rs 20 lakh to murder Manjit. Police analyzed CCTV footage, traced the suspects' pre-incident reconnaissance, and arrested Sachin Rathore and an accomplice, while another suspect remains at large.

Verified True
Confidence 4
Incident Date Feb. 21, 2025
Incident Type Murder

Basic Information

Country: India

State/Province: Uttar Pradesh, India

City/Region: Greater Noida

Incident Type: Murder

Relationship Status: Separated

Relationship Duration: Approximately 8 years

Incident Date: Feb. 21, 2025

Relationship Journey

Relationship Origins:

  • Met at school/college/university

Relationship Stages:

  • Dating
  • Separated
  • Married Living Separately
  • Love Marriage

Analysis

Contributing Factors:

  • Financial Issues
  • Domestic Conflict
  • Objection to the marriage
  • Money / Financial Gain
  • Divorce / Separation

Red Flags:

  • Escalation Pattern / Violence
  • Suspects identified
  • Threats
  • Divorce Pending / Recent Separation
  • High-Conflict Household

Motives:

  • Money / Financial Gain
  • Revenge
  • Honor/social pressure
  • Eliminate spouse
  • Avoid divorce settlement

Relationship Outcomes:

  • Separation
  • Legal case ongoing
  • Homicide during marriage
  • Arrest made
  • Investigation still ongoing
  • Contract killing involved
  • Deadbody recovery

People Link Graph

Relationship Journey Graph

1

Origin

  • Met at school/college/university

How the relationship or connection began.

2

Status

  • Separated

Approximately 8 years

3

Stages

  • Dating
  • Separated
  • Married Living Separately
  • Love Marriage

Important relationship phases recorded for this case.

4

Warning Signals

  • Escalation Pattern / Violence
  • Suspects identified
  • Threats
  • Divorce Pending / Recent Separation
  • High-Conflict Household

Reported red flags or early concern points.

5

Pressure Points

  • Financial Issues
  • Domestic Conflict
  • Objection to the marriage
  • Money / Financial Gain
  • Divorce / Separation
  • Money / Financial Gain
  • Revenge
  • Honor/social pressure
  • Eliminate spouse
  • Avoid divorce settlement

Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.

6

Incident

2025-02-21

7

Outcome

  • Separation
  • Legal case ongoing
  • Homicide during marriage
  • Arrest made
  • Investigation still ongoing
  • Contract killing involved
  • Deadbody recovery

Recorded relationship or case outcome.

Sources

English labels are shown first. Original-language titles are preserved for source verification.

AI Intelligence Assessment

Relationship Pattern

Financial Conflict

Pattern Analysis

The relationship originated as a long-term dating relationship in college that led to an intercaste marriage against family wishes. Domestic conflict escalated immediately after the wedding, exacerbated by the sudden death of the groom's father and caste-based animosity. Following physical separation, legal disputes and court mediation ensued, centered on a massive alimony demand of Rs 1 crore. When financial settlement negotiations broke down, the dispute shifted from legal maneuvering to lethal retaliation orchestrated by the wife's brother.

Investigative Notes

The case is fundamentally relationship-driven, originating from an intercaste marriage, severe domestic incompatibility, formal court mediation, and a contentious Rs 1 crore alimony dispute that escalated into a contract killing masterminded by the wife's brother.

Investigation Confusion

Initial confusion occurred regarding whether the incident was a vehicular accident or a targeted shooting. CCTV analysis revealed that assailants intentionally staged a minor vehicle bump in an area lacking camera coverage to lure the victim out of his car.

Case Reconstruction / Puzzle Pieces

Reconstruction indicates that after mediation over a Rs 1 crore alimony demand failed, Sachin Rathore hired Pramod and hitmen for Rs 20 lakh. After tracking the victim's morning route from Vasundhara to Greater Noida West for several days, assailants bumped his vehicle and shot him in the head when he stepped out to inspect damage.

Risk Assessment

High-risk escalation indicators included rapid marital breakdown within months of marriage, extensive retaliatory legal filings across multiple jurisdictions, explicit verbal threats of violence and financial destruction made during home visits, and extreme bitterness surrounding failed monetary negotiations.

Key Takeaways

Severe financial friction during divorce proceedings, combined with extended family interference and explicit threats, represents a critical violent escalation risk requiring proactive police reporting and risk mitigation.

AI Case Q&A

What early signals mattered most?

Caste-based family hostility, immediate post-marital domestic arguments, explicit threats to eliminate lineage, and rapid filing of multiple legal notices served as key early signals.

Which clues helped connect the case?

Dashcam/car footage, motorcycle tracking across 100 CCTV cameras, hotel accommodation records, and prior police reports regarding family harassment served as main clues.

Which evidence types appeared strongest?

Crucial evidence includes CCTV surveillance of motorcycle hitmen, car collision marks, hotel check-in records of the suspects, and confessed financial contract details.

Witness / Eyewitness Statements

The victim's sister recounted tracking her brother's phone to the hospital, discovering his undamaged car with gunshot marks, and recalling explicit threats made by the wife on June 1. The victim's mother demanded capital punishment for the perpetrators.

How did follow-up reports change the understanding?

Initial reports treated the shooting as an ambiguous road incident, but follow-up police work uncovered a pre-planned hitman contract motivated by ongoing legal mediation and alimony disputes.

What remained unclear?

Police continue to retrieve audio and text message data to determine whether Megha Rathore directly participated in planning the contract killing with her brother.

← Back to Home