RelationWatch
OSINT Case File

Kajal Chauhan Allegedly Murdered by Shiv Pandey and Pratima Pandey, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India

Case Summary

On January 16, 2024, 22-year-old Kajal Chauhan was killed after being struck and run over by a high-speed black Scorpio SUV on a service road near Tughalpur in Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh. Initially reported by her family on January 18, 2024, as a hit-and-run vehicular accident, an investigation led by ACP-1 and SHO Knowledge Park Police Station revealed a deliberate murder plot. Shiv Pandey, who had been living in a live-in relationship with Kajal for about a year after meeting her at a marketing firm, had concealed that he was already married to Pratima Pandey. Approximately two months prior to the incident, Kajal and Pratima discovered the truth, leading to frequent disputes. Kajal repeatedly visited Shiv and Pratima's home in Sector 110, Greater Noida, demanding a financial settlement, property share, or a portion of the proceeds from selling Shiv's Scorpio. Fearing police complaints and financial losses, Shiv and Pratima conspired to murder Kajal by staging her death as an accident. On January 16, Shiv called Kajal to wait along the service lane near Tughalpur, where he drove the SUV with Pratima present inside, intentionally running Kajal over and confirming her death before fleeing. Both Shiv Pandey and Pratima Pandey were arrested by the police, and the vehicle used in the crime was recovered.

Verified True
Confidence 4
Incident Date Jan. 16, 2024
Incident Type Murder

Basic Information

Country: India

State/Province: Uttar Pradesh, India

City/Region: Greater Noida

Incident Type: Murder

Relationship Status: Extramarital relationship

Relationship Duration: 1 year

Incident Date: Jan. 16, 2024

Relationship Journey

Relationship Origins:

  • Met at Workplace

Relationship Stages:

  • Living Together without Marriage
  • Married Living Together
  • Police report filed

Analysis

Contributing Factors:

  • Cheating / Infidelity
  • Financial Issues
  • Domestic Conflict
  • Property Gain
  • Money / Financial Gain

Red Flags:

  • Deception after incident
  • Suspects identified
  • Secret affair

Motives:

  • Money / Financial Gain
  • Property dispute
  • Fear of exposure
  • Eliminate romantic rival

Relationship Outcomes:

  • Legal case ongoing
  • Homicide during marriage
  • Arrest made
  • Relationship ended
  • Weapon recovery
  • Investigation still ongoing

People Link Graph

Relationship Journey Graph

1

Origin

  • Met at Workplace

How the relationship or connection began.

2

Status

  • Extramarital relationship

1 year

3

Stages

  • Living Together without Marriage
  • Married Living Together
  • Police report filed

Important relationship phases recorded for this case.

4

Warning Signals

  • Deception after incident
  • Suspects identified
  • Secret affair

Reported red flags or early concern points.

5

Pressure Points

  • Cheating / Infidelity
  • Financial Issues
  • Domestic Conflict
  • Property Gain
  • Money / Financial Gain
  • Money / Financial Gain
  • Property dispute
  • Fear of exposure
  • Eliminate romantic rival

Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.

6

Incident

2024-01-16

7

Outcome

  • Legal case ongoing
  • Homicide during marriage
  • Arrest made
  • Relationship ended
  • Weapon recovery
  • Investigation still ongoing

Recorded relationship or case outcome.

Sources

English labels are shown first. Original-language titles are preserved for source verification.

AI Intelligence Assessment

Relationship Pattern

Infidelity

Pattern Analysis

The relationship pattern involved a secret extramarital live-in relationship initiated at a workplace, where the male offender deceived both his wife and his partner. When the deception was exposed, the victim asserted her demands for financial compensation and property rights, triggering severe conflict. Rather than resolving the dispute through legal or personal channels, the primary offender and his wife jointly conspired to eliminate the victim, masking the violent murder as a routine hit-and-run vehicular accident.

Investigative Notes

The case was initially registered as a road accident under Knowledge Park Police Station on January 18, 2024, following a complaint by the victim's family. Police intelligence, informer tips, CCTV camera footage, and mobile phone call records subsequently revealed a murder plot. The charges were upgraded from accident sections to murder. Suspects Shiv Pandey and Pratima Pandey were arrested and remanded to judicial custody, and the black Mahindra Scorpio SUV used in the crime was seized.

Investigation Confusion

Initial confusion arose because the crime scene appeared to be a vehicular hit-and-run accident. The suspects intentionally staged the incident along an open service lane at night to avoid immediate murder suspicion. Police re-evaluated the scene after receiving informer inputs and examining technical evidence.

Case Reconstruction / Puzzle Pieces

Investigating officers connected electronic call records, informer reports, and CCTV footage to retrace Shiv Pandey's communications with Kajal Chauhan on January 16, 2024. The records established that Shiv summoned Kajal to a specific service lane near Tughalpur. The collision was re-examined as deliberate acceleration, confirming that Shiv and Pratima drove to the location, struck Kajal, drove over her to ensure death, and fled the scene.

Risk Assessment

Extramarital deception combined with cohabitating live-in dynamics and escalating financial demands created extreme volatility. Fearing legal complaints, social exposure, and financial loss, the offender and his wife escalated from verbal altercations to deliberate homicide planning, using a motor vehicle as a lethal weapon under the cover of darkness.

Key Takeaways

Staged vehicular hit-and-run incidents require thorough technical review including call detail records, camera networks, and interpersonal background checks. Unresolved infidelity conflicts involving high financial or property demands represent high-risk escalation pathways.

AI Case Q&A

What early signals mattered most?

Kajal discovered two months prior that Shiv was married, leading to repeated personal visits to his home and vocal demands for property and money.

Which clues helped connect the case?

Informer tips, mobile phone records showing Shiv calling Kajal to the location, and CCTV tracking of the black Scorpio SUV identified the premeditated nature of the crime.

Which evidence types appeared strongest?

Recovered black Mahindra Scorpio SUV, mobile call detail records, CCTV footage, and police statements.

Witness / Eyewitness Statements

DCP Saad Miah Khan stated that the police initially registered an accident case based on the family's application, but subsequent informer information and investigative findings by ACP-1 and SHO Knowledge Park proved it was a planned murder executed by both husband and wife.

How did follow-up reports change the understanding?

Initial reports treated the incident as a hit-and-run road fatality, but follow-up police work altered the case classification to premeditated murder under relevant statutory provisions.

What remained unclear?

Court proceedings and formal trial outcomes remain ongoing following the arrest and remanding of both accused.

← Back to Home