Vineet Manocha, a wealthy medicine businessman in Kanpur, was allegedly murdered in a conspiracy involving his daughter-in-law Shalu, and two hired killers Vishal and Rajkishore. Shalu reportedly planned the murder due to family and financial conflicts, including restrictions imposed by Vineet on her and her husband Subrat's lifestyle. The killers entered the apartment using a duplicate key and attacked Vineet when he returned home. Shalu was at a party with her husband during the murder, providing an alibi. Police arrested Vishal and Rajkishore based on CCTV footage and later arrested Shalu after interrogation. The investigation continues regarding the involvement of Subrat, Vineet's son.
Country: India
State/Province: Uttar Pradesh, India
City/Region: Kanpur
Incident Type: Murder
Relationship Status: Married
Relationship Duration:
Incident Date: Sept. 5, 2026
Relationship Origins:
Relationship Stages:
Contributing Factors:
Red Flags:
Motives:
Relationship Outcomes:
How the relationship or connection began.
Important relationship phases recorded for this case.
Reported red flags or early concern points.
Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.
2026-09-05
Recorded relationship or case outcome.
English labels are shown first. Original-language titles are preserved for source verification.
Crime Tak - India · Original language: English
Crorepati ससुर की हत्या करने वाले सुपारी किलर ने कैमरे पर बताई Bahu की पूरी ख़ूनी प्लानिंग | Kanpur
Domestic Violence
The case involves a domestic violence pattern where a daughter-in-law allegedly orchestrated the murder of her father-in-law due to family control and financial disputes. The involvement of hired killers and secretive planning indicates premeditation and coercive control within the family dynamics.
Police used CCTV footage to identify and arrest Vishal and Rajkishore. Interrogations revealed Shalu's alleged role in planning the murder. Shalu was arrested after confession during questioning. Investigation continues regarding Subrat's involvement. Evidence includes CCTV, confessions, and witness statements from party attendees.
Uncertainty remains about the extent of Subrat's involvement. Some financial amounts are unclear. The exact role of each accused and the full conspiracy details are still under investigation.
Shalu allegedly hired Vishal about 20 days before the murder, promising ₹6 lakh. Vishal involved Rajkishore without full disclosure. Shalu provided a duplicate key and arranged entry under a false pretext. On the murder night, Shalu left for a party with Subrat and son, creating an alibi. Vishal and Rajkishore hid in Shalu's bedroom and attacked Vineet when he returned. They fled after the murder. Police arrested the accused based on CCTV and confessions.
High risk due to premeditated violence involving close family members and hired offenders, with ongoing investigation into further involvement.
Early signs included family financial control conflicts and secretive planning. The use of hired killers and alibi creation shows high premeditation. CCTV footage was crucial for investigation. The case highlights risks of domestic disputes escalating to lethal violence.
Family financial control disputes, secretive communication, and Shalu's dissatisfaction with restrictions.
Duplicate key, CCTV footage, Vishal's confession, and Shalu's messages to Vishal.
CCTV footage showing accused entering and leaving the apartment, confessions from Vishal and Shalu, and witness statements from the party.
Party manager and DJ reported Shalu and Subrat partying normally with no visible tension during the murder time, supporting the alibi claim.
No follow-up reports available beyond initial arrests and ongoing investigation.
Subrat's involvement remains unclear; exact financial details and full conspiracy scope are still under investigation.