Punjabi social media influencer Manjeet Kaur was kidnapped on July 3rd near a liquor shop in Chandigarh by two acquaintances, Shubhi and Pinda. She was beaten, taken to Morinda, tied to a Shatoot tree, doused with petrol, and set on fire alive. She suffered severe burns and was hospitalized for 54 days before dying on August 26th. Manjeet was seven weeks pregnant at the time, and her unborn child also died. Police initially delayed registering the case due to jurisdictional disputes between Chandigarh and Kharar Sadar police stations. A murder and kidnapping case has now been registered, and police are investigating the suspects who remain at large. Manjeet had previously spoken in an interview about a troubled live-in relationship with a man who wanted her body and money, which she had given but still felt distressed.
Country: India
State/Province: Chandigarh, India
City/Region: Chandigarh
Incident Type: Murder
Relationship Status: Divorced
Relationship Duration:
Incident Date: July 3, 2024
Primary reported outcome: Homicide
Reported self-harm outcome: No suicide or attempt reported
Reported sequence: Order not reported / unclear
Additional victims reported: 1
Additional victim events:
Relationship Origins:
Relationship Stages:
Contributing Factors:
Red Flags:
Motives:
Relationship Outcomes:
How the relationship or connection began.
Important relationship phases recorded for this case.
Reported red flags or early concern points.
Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.
2024-07-03
Recorded relationship or case outcome.
English labels are shown first. Original-language titles are preserved for source verification.
Crime Tak - India · Original language: English
Punjabi Influencer Manjeet Kaur की पेड़ से बांध ज़िंदा जलाया,PM Report में हुआ चौंकाने वाला खुलासा
Domestic Violence
The case involves a domestic violence pattern where a divorced woman was targeted by acquaintances with whom she had a troubled relationship. The violence escalated to kidnapping and attempted murder by burning, resulting in death. The involvement of close acquaintances and prior relationship distress highlights coercive control and revenge motives.
Police initially delayed case registration due to jurisdictional disputes between Chandigarh and Kharar Sadar police stations. CCTV footage is limited due to short retention periods. Investigation ongoing to locate suspects Shubhi and Pinda. The victim's mother reported the crime and sought justice. The case involves kidnapping and murder charges.
Jurisdictional confusion between Chandigarh and Kharar Sadar police stations delayed statement recording and case registration, allowing suspects to remain at large. Uncertainty remains about the identity of the man mentioned in the victim's interview who wanted her body and money.
On July 3rd, Manjeet Kaur was called by acquaintances Shubhi and Pinda near a liquor shop in Chandigarh. She was kidnapped, beaten in a car, taken to Morinda, tied to a tree, doused with petrol, and set on fire alive. Locals and a close friend rescued her and admitted her to hospital. She regained consciousness once on August 5th and recounted the attack. She died on August 26th after 54 days of treatment. Police investigation began after her death, with jurisdictional disputes delaying early action. CCTV footage search is ongoing but limited.
High risk due to prior relationship conflict, recent separation, and escalation to extreme violence. Delayed police response increased risk by allowing suspects to evade arrest.
Early police inaction and jurisdictional disputes can hinder timely justice and allow suspects to evade arrest. Close acquaintances can pose significant risks in domestic violence contexts. Victims may suffer prolonged trauma before fatal outcomes. Social media influencers may face unique vulnerabilities. Early intervention and clear police jurisdiction are critical.
The victim's prior troubled live-in relationship and distress expressed in an interview were early signals. The involvement of acquaintances who called her to meet near a liquor shop also signaled risk.
Victim's hospital statement on August 5th detailing kidnapping and burning. Testimony from mother and close friends. CCTV footage near the liquor shop, though limited.
Victim's hospital testimony, witness accounts from locals who rescued her, CCTV footage near the meeting location (limited retention).
Not reported in detail; locals and a close friend reportedly rescued the victim and admitted her to hospital. The victim's mother reported the crime and sought police action.
Initial police jurisdiction confusion delayed case registration. After victim's death, case registered and investigation intensified. No further follow-up details available.
Identity and role of the man mentioned in the victim's interview remain unclear. Exact motives behind the attack are not fully established. Current whereabouts of suspects Shubhi and Pinda are unknown.