RelationWatch
← Back to Brazil cases
OSINT Case File

Íris Rocha de Souza and Márcia Murdered by Cleilton Santana dos Santos, Alfredo Chaves, Espírito Santo, Brazil

Case Summary

In January 2024, the body of Íris Rocha de Souza, a 30-year-old pregnant nurse, was found in Alfredo Chaves, Espírito Santo, Brazil. She had been shot multiple times and was eight months pregnant. Her ex-boyfriend and father of the unborn child, Cleilton Santana dos Santos, was identified as the suspect. The relationship was marked by control, jealousy, and violence, including a prior assault and threats. Cleilton denied involvement initially but later confessed at trial. He was sentenced to over 51 years in prison for femicide, abortion without consent, and concealment of the corpse.

Verified True
Confidence 4
Incident Date Jan. 11, 2024
Incident Type Domestic Violence Homicide

Basic Information

Country: Brazil

State/Province: Espírito Santo, Brazil

City/Region: Alfredo Chaves

Incident Type: Domestic Violence Homicide

Relationship Status: Ex-partners

Relationship Duration: Approximately 6 months

Incident Date: Jan. 11, 2024

Incident Sequence and Additional Victims

Primary reported outcome: Homicide

Reported self-harm outcome: No suicide or attempt reported

Reported sequence: Order not reported / unclear

Additional victims reported: 1

Additional victim events:

  • Rebeca — Child; Killed; Same episode; order unclear

Relationship Journey

Relationship Origins:

  • Met at shop or shopping mall

Relationship Stages:

  • Dating
  • Separated

Analysis

Contributing Factors:

  • Domestic Violence Allegation
  • Domestic Conflict
  • Divorce / Separation
  • Family pressure
  • Suspicion of infidelity

Red Flags:

  • Secretive communication patterns
  • Escalation Pattern / Violence
  • Manipulative behavior
  • Threats
  • Stalking / Repeated Harassment
  • Firearm Access / Concerning Weapon Behavior
  • Divorce Pending / Recent Separation

Motives:

  • Jealousy
  • Fear of exposure
  • Eliminate romantic partner

Relationship Outcomes:

  • Divorce filed
  • Divorce finalized
  • Legal case ongoing
  • Homicide during marriage
  • Arrest made
  • Weapon recovery
  • Investigation still ongoing
  • Deadbody recovery

People Link Graph

Relationship Journey Graph

1

Origin

  • Met at shop or shopping mall

How the relationship or connection began.

2

Status

  • Ex-partners

Approximately 6 months

3

Stages

  • Dating
  • Separated

Important relationship phases recorded for this case.

4

Warning Signals

  • Secretive communication patterns
  • Escalation Pattern / Violence
  • Manipulative behavior
  • Threats
  • Stalking / Repeated Harassment
  • Firearm Access / Concerning Weapon Behavior
  • Divorce Pending / Recent Separation

Reported red flags or early concern points.

5

Pressure Points

  • Domestic Violence Allegation
  • Domestic Conflict
  • Divorce / Separation
  • Family pressure
  • Suspicion of infidelity
  • Jealousy
  • Fear of exposure
  • Eliminate romantic partner

Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.

6

Incident

2024-01-11

7

Outcome

  • Divorce filed
  • Divorce finalized
  • Legal case ongoing
  • Homicide during marriage
  • Arrest made
  • Weapon recovery
  • Investigation still ongoing
  • Deadbody recovery

Recorded relationship or case outcome.

Sources

English labels are shown first. Original-language titles are preserved for source verification.

Íris Rocha de Souza and Márcia Murdered by Cleilton Santana dos Santos, Alfredo Chaves, Espírito Santo, Brazil

Relato de Casos Criminais · Original language: English

View original title

ELE A PERSEGUIA E ACHAVA QUE A FILHA NÃO ERA DELE | O Caso Íris Rocha

AI Intelligence Assessment

Relationship Pattern

Domestic Violence

Pattern Analysis

The relationship between Íris and Cleilton was characterized by escalating control, jealousy, and violence. Despite initial appearances of calm and happiness, Cleilton exerted possessive control over Íris, including restricting her clothing and movements. The relationship ended after a violent assault, but Cleilton continued to stalk and threaten Íris. The homicide was premeditated, involving firearm use and concealment of the body, reflecting a pattern of coercive control and lethal domestic violence.

Investigative Notes

Investigation included forensic analysis linking the firearm to the crime, geolocation and video evidence contradicting suspect's statements, and DNA confirming paternity. Failures in protective order processing and police system integration were identified. The suspect initially denied involvement but confessed at trial. Appeals led to increased sentencing. Psychological and psychiatric follow-up was authorized but no insanity plea was accepted.

Investigation Confusion

Initial suspect denial conflicted with forensic and video evidence. The suspect falsely claimed military police status and denied recent contact with the victim. Protective order request was lost due to system integration issues. Some procedural delays and difficulties in court hearings occurred, including transport and witness participation.

Case Reconstruction / Puzzle Pieces

The victim was last seen alive on January 10, 2024, entering the suspect's car. She was shot multiple times and her body was found in a remote area with lime poured over it to conceal evidence. The suspect controlled and threatened her during their relationship, which ended after a violent assault in October 2023. Despite separation, the suspect continued to stalk her. Forensic evidence linked the suspect's firearm to the murder. The suspect was arrested, denied involvement, then confessed at trial. The unborn child also died, legally classified as abortion without consent.

Risk Assessment

High risk due to prior assault, threats with a firearm, stalking behavior, and failure of protective measures. The suspect's denial and concealment efforts increased danger. The victim's attempts to seek protection were not effectively processed, contributing to fatal outcome.

Key Takeaways

Early signs of escalating control and violence, including physical assault and threats with a firearm, were present but protective measures failed. Surveillance and forensic evidence were crucial in disproving suspect claims. The case highlights the dangers of coercive control and the importance of timely legal protection for victims.

AI Case Q&A

What early signals mattered most?

The assault in October 2023 with chokehold and threats with a firearm, along with the victim's request for a protective order, were critical early signals.

Which clues helped connect the case?

Video footage of the victim entering the suspect's car and being seen together after the breakup, forensic evidence linking the firearm to the crime scene, and geolocation data were key clues.

Which evidence types appeared strongest?

Ballistic micro-comparison testing, DNA paternity test, video surveillance, geolocation data, and forensic examination of the body and crime scene.

Witness / Eyewitness Statements

Friends and family reported the suspect's controlling and possessive behavior. Police officers, friends, and family testified about the suspect's control over the victim, including restrictions on her movements and clothing. Delegate Maria da Glória described the victim crouching to avoid being seen by the suspect.

How did follow-up reports change the understanding?

Initial denial by the suspect was overturned by forensic and video evidence. The suspect confessed at trial, leading to conviction and sentencing. Appeals resulted in increased sentence length.

What remained unclear?

Exact details of the execution of the crime remain limited as the suspect confessed without providing many details. The victim's cell phone was not recovered, limiting full reconstruction of final contacts.

Add cases to private collections and export structured data. View plans

← Back to Home