Christopher and Susan Wybrow, married for nearly a decade, lived on a large estate in Leen Heath, Suffolk. Susan had an affair with her flying instructor Dennis Saunders. On October 18, 1989, Susan and Dennis conspired to assault Christopher, intending to make it appear as a fatal lawn mower accident so Susan could inherit his estate. The attack failed when Christopher escaped. Susan and Dennis fled to Europe but later surrendered. They were convicted of conspiracy to cause actual bodily harm and kidnapping but acquitted of conspiracy to murder after a retrial. Sentences were served concurrently. The case involved complex relationship dynamics, including infidelity, domestic conflict, and financial motives.
Country: England
State/Province: None
City/Region: Leen Heath
Incident Type: Non-Murder
Relationship Status: Married
Relationship Duration: Approximately 8 years
Recorded context: New relationship started
Reported initiator: Victim
Relationship timing: During marriage or ongoing partnership, before separation
Incident Date: Oct. 18, 1989
Relationship Origins:
Relationship Stages:
Contributing Factors:
Red Flags:
Motives:
Relationship Outcomes:
How the relationship or connection began.
Approximately 8 years
Important relationship phases recorded for this case.
Reported red flags or early concern points.
Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.
1989-10-18
Recorded relationship or case outcome.
English labels are shown first. Original-language titles are preserved for source verification.
They Walk Among Us | UK True Crime · Original language: English
BETRAYED: Wife's Deadly Lawnmower Plot Against Wealthy Barrister | 1990s British True Crime
Infidelity
The case centers on a marital relationship strained by infidelity and domestic conflict. Susan Wybrow's affair with Dennis Saunders and their conspiracy to harm her husband for financial gain exemplify a pattern of betrayal and escalating violence within a troubled marriage.
Police investigation revealed the conspiracy to stage a fatal accident. Both suspects were arrested after fleeing abroad. Trial evidence included victim testimony, witness observations, and forensic findings. Appeals highlighted judicial conduct issues but did not overturn convictions for conspiracy to cause actual bodily harm and kidnapping.
Conflicting accounts from Susan Wybrow and Dennis Saunders about the intent and planning of the attack. Judicial interruptions during trial complicated narrative clarity. Disputed whether the intent was to kill or merely to assault.
Christopher and Susan Wybrow's marriage deteriorated amid infidelity and domestic disputes. Susan began an affair with Dennis Saunders, who became involved in a plot to assault Christopher and stage a fatal lawn mower accident. The attack on October 18, 1989, failed when Christopher escaped. Susan and Dennis fled but surrendered after a week. Legal proceedings included initial conviction and later acquittal on murder conspiracy charges after retrial.
High risk due to escalating verbal and physical conflicts, infidelity, and plotting of serious harm. The involvement of a third party lover increased complexity and danger.
Early signs of marital dissatisfaction and infidelity can escalate to serious violence. Complex relationship dynamics involving a third party can increase risk. Judicial conduct can impact trial fairness. The case underscores the importance of thorough investigation and victim testimony.
Marital arguments escalating to physical violence, Susan's affair with Dennis Saunders, and Susan's exaggerated claims of spousal abuse.
Victim's identification of attacker, neighbor's alert, discovery of staged accident scene, and phone call records between Susan and Dennis.
Victim testimony, forensic evidence at the scene, witness observations of Susan and Dennis's affair, and intercepted communications.
Neighbor Norman Nukem observed Christopher Wybrow drenched and injured after escape. Fellow flying instructor Trevor Seymour reported Susan and Dennis's public displays of affection. Dennis Saunders's son blamed Susan for the attack.
Appeals raised concerns about judicial conduct affecting trial fairness, leading to a retrial and acquittal on murder conspiracy charges.
Exact intent behind the attack remains disputed between defendants and victim. The degree of Susan's coercion or voluntary participation is unclear.