RelationWatch
← Back to United States cases
OSINT Case File

Courtney Allen and Steven Allen Case Involving Tod Sonnes and Jennifer Sonnes, Kent, Washington, United States

Case Summary

Courtney Allen, living in Washington state, engaged in a secret online affair with Tod Sonnes, a married man from Arizona, starting in 2012. When her husband Steven discovered the affair, he exposed it to family and friends, escalating tensions. Tod Sonnes then initiated a prolonged cyberstalking campaign against Courtney and Steven, involving threatening messages, doxxing, and distribution of intimate photos. The harassment severely impacted the Allens' lives, causing psychological distress and job changes. Despite initial police challenges, the case was taken up by cybercrime specialists, leading to a 2017 trial where Tod Sonnes was found responsible and ordered to pay damages. The harassment has continued at a reduced level, with ongoing fears and threats.

Verified True
Confidence 4
Incident Date Unknown
Incident Type Non-Murder

Basic Information

Country: United States

State/Province: Washington, United States

City/Region: Kent

Incident Type: Non-Murder

Relationship Status: Married

Relationship Duration: Approximately 11 years (marriage)

Affair / New-Partner Context

Recorded context: Affair started / overlapping relationship

Reported initiator: Victim

Relationship timing: During marriage or ongoing partnership, before separation

Incident Date: None

Relationship Journey

Relationship Origins:

  • Met on social media
  • Met during travel

Relationship Stages:

  • Married Living Together
  • Separated

Analysis

Contributing Factors:

  • Cheating / Infidelity
  • Domestic Conflict
  • Divorce / Separation

Red Flags:

  • False accusations of infidelity
  • Escalation Pattern / Violence
  • Threats
  • Stalking / Repeated Harassment
  • Suicidal Ideation
  • Divorce Pending / Recent Separation

Motives:

  • Revenge
  • Jealousy
  • Control/domination
  • Fear of exposure

Relationship Outcomes:

  • Separation
  • Legal case ongoing
  • Protective order issued
  • Relationship ended

People Link Graph

Relationship Journey Graph

1

Origin

  • Met on social media
  • Met during travel

How the relationship or connection began.

2

Status

  • Married

Approximately 11 years (marriage)

3

Stages

  • Married Living Together
  • Separated

Important relationship phases recorded for this case.

4

Warning Signals

  • False accusations of infidelity
  • Escalation Pattern / Violence
  • Threats
  • Stalking / Repeated Harassment
  • Suicidal Ideation
  • Divorce Pending / Recent Separation

Reported red flags or early concern points.

5

Pressure Points

  • Cheating / Infidelity
  • Domestic Conflict
  • Divorce / Separation
  • Revenge
  • Jealousy
  • Control/domination
  • Fear of exposure

Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.

6

Outcome

  • Separation
  • Legal case ongoing
  • Protective order issued
  • Relationship ended

Recorded relationship or case outcome.

Sources

English labels are shown first. Original-language titles are preserved for source verification.

Courtney Allen and Steven Allen Case Involving Tod Sonnes and Jennifer Sonnes, Kent, Washington, United States

Kati Winter - Germany · Original language: English

View original title

Er dreht komplett durch? Der IRRE Cyberstalking-Fall von Courtney Allen | Crime Time Doku

AI Intelligence Assessment

Relationship Pattern

Infidelity

Pattern Analysis

The case centers on a secret online affair that escalated into a prolonged cyberstalking campaign. The infidelity triggered family and social exposure, leading to escalating harassment, threats, and psychological terror. The perpetrator used digital means to control, intimidate, and retaliate, severely impacting the victims' lives and relationships.

Investigative Notes

Initial police response was limited due to jurisdictional challenges and the nature of cybercrime. The case was advanced by cybercrime specialists and legal intervention. Evidence included IP address tracing, cyber forensic analysis, and extensive digital communications. The perpetrator filed counterclaims but failed to provide evidence. The case set a legal precedent with a significant damages award.

Investigation Confusion

Conflicting claims arose with the perpetrator alleging victimhood and accusing the Allens of harassment. Police initially doubted the victims' claims, suspecting retaliation motives. The perpetrator's use of VPNs and anonymizing tools complicated evidence gathering.

Case Reconstruction / Puzzle Pieces

Courtney Allen met Tod Sonnes online in 2012 and engaged in a secret affair. Steven Allen discovered the affair and exposed it to family and friends, escalating tensions. Tod Sonnes initiated a cyberstalking campaign involving threatening messages, doxxing, and distribution of intimate images. The Allens reported to police and FBI, but initial responses were limited. Legal action was taken in 2015, culminating in a 2017 trial where Tod Sonnes was found responsible. Despite the verdict, harassment continued at a reduced level.

Risk Assessment

High risk due to prolonged cyberstalking, threats of violence, doxxing, and psychological harm. The perpetrator demonstrated persistence, technical knowledge, and willingness to escalate harassment despite legal actions.

Key Takeaways

Secret online affairs can escalate into severe cyberstalking and harassment. Digital evidence and cyber forensic expertise are critical in such cases. Victims may face disbelief and jurisdictional challenges. Legal precedents can establish accountability for cyberstalking and revenge porn. Persistent psychological harm and fear can endure beyond legal resolutions.

AI Case Q&A

What early signals mattered most?

The secret online affair and subsequent exposure to family and friends were early signals. Increasingly hostile and threatening messages, doxxing, and distribution of intimate images indicated escalation.

Which clues helped connect the case?

IP address tracing to the perpetrator's home, changes in email writing style, and the timing of messages helped connect the case. The perpetrator's use of VPNs and anonymizing tools was a clue to conceal identity.

Which evidence types appeared strongest?

Cyber forensic analysis, IP address tracking, over 1,000 pieces of digital evidence, and expert testimony were strongest. Metadata requests and email content were critical.

Witness / Eyewitness Statements

Not reported.

How did follow-up reports change the understanding?

Follow-up reports confirmed ongoing harassment despite legal victory. The perpetrator filed an appeal and continued online attacks, including publishing intimate images and alleged evidence on a blog.

What remained unclear?

The full cessation of harassment remains unclear. The outcome of the appeal and any subsequent trials is not reported.

Add cases to private collections and export structured data. View plans

← Back to Home