← Back to India casesSankari De and Amarjyoti De Allegedly Murdered by Bandana Kalita, Dhanti De, and others, Guwahati, Assam, India
Case Summary
In Guwahati, Assam, Bandana Kalita allegedly murdered her mother-in-law Sankari De and husband Amarjyoti De with the help of two accomplices, Dhanti De and Arup Deka. Sankari De was suffocated with a pillow and her body dismembered and disposed of. Twenty-two days later, Amarjyoti De was similarly killed and dismembered. Bandana then managed the properties and finances of Sankari De, withdrawing money fraudulently. The police investigation led to the arrest and confession of Bandana and her accomplices. Despite the severity, all three were granted bail after months in jail.
Basic Information
Country: India
State/Province: Assam, India
City/Region: Guwahati
Incident Type: Murder
Relationship Status: Married
Relationship Duration: 12 years
Affair / New-Partner Context
Recorded context: Affair started / overlapping relationship
Reported initiator: Alleged suspect / offender
Relationship timing: During marriage or ongoing partnership, before separation
Incident Date: Aug. 7, 2022
Incident Sequence and Additional Victims
Primary reported outcome: Homicide
Reported self-harm outcome: No suicide or attempt reported
Reported sequence: Order not reported / unclear
Additional victims reported: 1
Additional victim events:
- Sankari De — Family or household member; Killed; Before self-harm
Relationship Journey
Relationship Origins:
- Met at Workplace
Relationship Stages:
- Married Living Separately
Analysis
Contributing Factors:
- Cheating / Infidelity
- Financial Issues
- Domestic Conflict
- Divorce / Separation
Red Flags:
- Financial secrecy
- False accusations of infidelity
- Deception after incident
- Escalation Pattern / Violence
- Secret affair
- Divorce Pending / Recent Separation
Motives:
- Money / Financial Gain
- Revenge
- Jealousy
- Eliminate romantic partner
Relationship Outcomes:
- Legal case ongoing
- Homicide during marriage
- Arrest made
- Investigation still ongoing
- Deadbody recovery
People Link Graph
Relationship Journey Graph
Origin
- Met at Workplace
How the relationship or connection began.
Status
- Married
12 years
Stages
- Married Living Separately
Important relationship phases recorded for this case.
Warning Signals
- Financial secrecy
- False accusations of infidelity
- Deception after incident
- Escalation Pattern / Violence
- Secret affair
- Divorce Pending / Recent Separation
Reported red flags or early concern points.
Pressure Points
- Cheating / Infidelity
- Financial Issues
- Domestic Conflict
- Divorce / Separation
- Money / Financial Gain
- Revenge
- Jealousy
- Eliminate romantic partner
Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.
Incident
2022-08-07
Outcome
- Legal case ongoing
- Homicide during marriage
- Arrest made
- Investigation still ongoing
- Deadbody recovery
Recorded relationship or case outcome.
Sources
English labels are shown first. Original-language titles are preserved for source verification.
Sankari De and Amarjyoti De Allegedly Murdered by Bandana Kalita, Dhanti De, and others, Guwahati, Assam, India
Rakshit Grover · Original language: Hindi
View original title
She Killed Her Husband & Mother in Law | Guwahati Double Murder Case
AI Intelligence Assessment
Relationship Pattern
Jealousy
Pattern Analysis
The case involves a marital relationship strained by financial dependency, infidelity, and family opposition. The wife engaged in an extramarital affair and conspired to eliminate both her husband and mother-in-law to gain financial control. The murders were premeditated and involved accomplices, with subsequent deception to cover up the crimes.
Investigative Notes
Police investigation was aided by financial transaction monitoring and CCTV evidence. Confession by the accused and recovery of bodies and weapons corroborated the case. Despite arrests and confessions, all accused were granted bail after months in custody. The case remains under legal proceedings.
Investigation Confusion
Initial missing person report filed by the suspect delayed suspicion. Lack of forensic evidence at crime scenes due to cleaning complicated early investigation. DNA confirmation was critical to link remains to victims. Bail granted to accused despite severity raised concerns.
Case Reconstruction / Puzzle Pieces
Bandana Kalita, married to Amarjyoti De, had a strained relationship with her mother-in-law Sankari De and husband due to financial and personal conflicts. She engaged in an affair with Dhanti De and conspired with him and Arup Deka to murder Sankari De by suffocation and dismemberment. After disposing of the body, Bandana managed the properties and finances. Twenty-two days later, the same trio murdered Amarjyoti De similarly. Bandana filed a false missing person report. Suspicious financial activity led Nirmalya De to alert police. CCTV footage and confessions led to arrests and recovery of evidence.
Risk Assessment
High risk due to financial dependency, infidelity, and escalating domestic conflict leading to lethal violence. The involvement of accomplices and attempts to conceal evidence indicate significant premeditation and manipulation.
Key Takeaways
Financial dependency and infidelity can escalate to lethal domestic violence. Concealment efforts may delay detection but financial and digital footprints are critical investigative tools. Family opposition and jealousy are potent risk factors. Bail decisions in severe cases may raise public safety concerns.
AI Case Q&A
What early signals mattered most?
Frequent fights over money, Bandana's affair with Dhanti De, and strained mother-in-law relationship were early signals.
Which clues helped connect the case?
Suspicious financial withdrawals from victim's accounts and Bandana's normal behavior despite missing persons were key clues.
Which evidence types appeared strongest?
ATM CCTV footage, DNA from bone marrow, confessions, and recovered weapons were strongest evidence.
Witness / Eyewitness Statements
Nirmalya De noticed Bandana's unusual calmness and financial activity; tenants reported Bandana collecting rent and managing properties; police interrogation yielded confessions.
How did follow-up reports change the understanding?
Initial missing person report was revealed false; forensic evidence and confessions clarified the case; bail granted to accused changed public perception.
What remained unclear?
Current legal outcomes and final convictions remain unclear; motives beyond financial gain and affair are not fully detailed.