RelationWatch
OSINT Case File

Srishti Kandari Death by her husband Saurabh Khatri and sister-in-law Charu in Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.

▶ View Event Simulation

Case Summary

Srishti Kandari, a 30-year-old government school mathematics teacher in Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India, died on July 29, 2026, following alleged domestic violence and harassment by her husband Saurabh Khatri and sister-in-law Charu. The couple had an arranged marriage starting November 29, 2025, and lived with the husband's family. The victim faced alleged superstition-based harassment and dowry-related abuse, blamed for the father-in-law's illness and death. A CB-CID probe is ongoing with arrests made.

Verified True
Confidence 5
Incident Date July 29, 2026
Incident Type Domestic Violence Homicide

Basic Information

Country: India

State/Province: Uttarakhand, India

City/Region: Dehradun

Incident Type: Domestic Violence Homicide

Relationship Status: Married

Relationship Duration: Approximately 8 months (marriage)

Incident Date: July 29, 2026

Relationship Journey

Relationship Origins:

  • Arranged marriage

Relationship Stages:

  • Married Living Together

Analysis

Contributing Factors:

  • Domestic Violence Allegation
  • Domestic Conflict
  • Mental instability

Red Flags:

  • Divorce Pending / Recent Separation
  • Mental Health Deterioration / Hopelessness

Motives:

  • Jealousy
  • Family pressure

Relationship Outcomes:

  • Arrest made
  • Investigation still ongoing
  • Deadbody recovery

People Link Graph

Relationship Journey Graph

1

Origin

  • Arranged marriage

How the relationship or connection began.

2

Status

  • Married

Approximately 8 months (marriage)

3

Stages

  • Married Living Together

Important relationship phases recorded for this case.

4

Warning Signals

  • Divorce Pending / Recent Separation
  • Mental Health Deterioration / Hopelessness

Reported red flags or early concern points.

5

Pressure Points

  • Domestic Violence Allegation
  • Domestic Conflict
  • Mental instability
  • Jealousy
  • Family pressure

Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.

6

Incident

2026-07-29

7

Outcome

  • Arrest made
  • Investigation still ongoing
  • Deadbody recovery

Recorded relationship or case outcome.

AI Intelligence Assessment

Relationship Pattern

Domestic Violence

Pattern Analysis

The case involves an arranged marriage with high family involvement and alleged coercive control and harassment by in-laws, particularly superstition-based blame for family misfortunes. The victim experienced mental abuse and suicidal ideation, culminating in her death shortly after recording a video statement. The pattern reflects domestic violence exacerbated by dowry demands and family pressure.

Investigative Notes

Arrests have been made of the husband and sister-in-law. A CB-CID probe has been ordered. The victim's mother is a complainant and witness. The deceased father-in-law was a subject of alleged superstition-based harassment. Investigation is ongoing with focus on domestic violence and dowry harassment.

Investigation Confusion

No reported confusion or conflicting claims in the investigation at this stage.

Case Reconstruction / Puzzle Pieces

The marriage began on November 29, 2025. Approximately three months later, the father-in-law suffered a heart attack and was diagnosed with cancer. The in-laws allegedly blamed the victim for these misfortunes, labeling her as inauspicious and harassing her over dowry issues. The father-in-law died on July 26, 2026. On July 29, 2026, the victim recorded a video statement describing her torment and died shortly thereafter. Arrests followed and a CB-CID investigation was launched.

Risk Assessment

High risk due to ongoing harassment, coercive control, mental health deterioration, and family pressure. The presence of dowry-related abuse and superstition-based blame increased vulnerability.

Key Takeaways

Early signs of superstition-based harassment and dowry-related abuse can escalate to fatal domestic violence. Mental health deterioration and suicidal ideation are critical warning signs. Family pressure and coercive control are significant risk factors in arranged marriages with high family involvement.

AI Case Q&A

What early signals mattered most?

Alleged superstition-based harassment, dowry demands, and mental abuse were early signals.

Which clues helped connect the case?

The victim's video statement and family reports of harassment helped connect the case.

Which evidence types appeared strongest?

Video statement by the victim and witness testimony from the victim's mother were strongest evidence types.

Witness / Eyewitness Statements

The victim's mother, Seema Kandari, is a complainant and witness. No other witness statements reported.

How did follow-up reports change the understanding?

No follow-up reports available beyond initial arrests and investigation order.

What remained unclear?

Details of the exact cause of death and full extent of involvement of other family members remain unclear.

← Back to Home