Megan Klesich, a 44-year-old mother of two, was murdered in her sleep on January 27, 1986, in Fairlight, New South Wales. Her husband, Andrew Klesich, a wealthy hotelier, was convicted of hiring a hitman to kill her. The murder followed years of marital strain, including Andrew's infatuation with other women. The hitman made multiple failed attempts before successfully shooting Megan twice in the head. The case involved a complex conspiracy with intermediaries and unfolded over years of investigation, trial, appeals, and legal challenges. Andrew Klesich served 25 years in prison before being paroled in 2012 under strict conditions. The case remains a notable example of domestic homicide involving contract killing.
Country: Australia
State/Province: New South Wales, Australia
City/Region: Fairlight
Incident Type: Murder
Relationship Status: Married
Relationship Duration: Approximately 24 years (marriage)
Incident Date: Jan. 27, 1986
Relationship Origins:
Relationship Stages:
Contributing Factors:
Red Flags:
Motives:
Relationship Outcomes:
How the relationship or connection began.
Approximately 24 years (marriage)
Important relationship phases recorded for this case.
Reported red flags or early concern points.
Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.
1986-01-27
Recorded relationship or case outcome.
English labels are shown first. Original-language titles are preserved for source verification.
LiSTNR Crime · Original language: English
JUDGEMENTS | Hiring a hitman to murder your wife (R v Kalajzich)
Jealousy
The case exhibits a pattern of jealousy and infidelity, with the husband engaging in extramarital relationships and ultimately orchestrating a contract killing to eliminate his wife. The prolonged domestic conflict and financial success contrasted with underlying marital strain, culminating in a lethal act driven by personal motives and desire for a new relationship.
The investigation relied heavily on circumstantial evidence and testimonies from accomplices who later cooperated with police. Initial charges against Andrew Klesich were dismissed but reinstated after further evidence. Legal challenges and appeals occurred, including a high-profile inquiry that upheld the conviction. The case highlights challenges in prosecuting contract killings involving middlemen.
Initial dismissal of charges against Andrew Klesich created uncertainty. The involvement of multiple intermediaries and conflicting testimonies complicated the investigation. Allegations of police corruption and conspiracy were raised but not substantiated in court.
Andrew Klesich, motivated by marital infidelity and desire to remove his wife, enlisted intermediaries to hire a hitman. Multiple failed attempts occurred due to logistical challenges and interference by family members. The hitman eventually succeeded in killing Megan in her sleep. Subsequent police investigation, aided by a paranoid hitman, led to arrests and convictions after years of legal proceedings.
High risk due to escalating domestic conflict, infidelity, access to firearms, and expressed intent to harm. The involvement of multiple intermediaries increased complexity but did not prevent eventual homicide.
Early signs of infidelity and domestic conflict can escalate to lethal outcomes. Contract killings involve complex networks that challenge investigations. Public and media influence can affect legal processes. Parole of serious offenders remains controversial.
Andrew Klesich's open desire for a rifle and hitman, infidelity, and prior failed attempts on Megan's life were key early signals.
Testimonies from intermediaries, intercepted letters, and the hitman's withdrawal and later confession helped connect the case.
Circumstantial evidence, accomplice testimonies, intercepted communications, and forensic evidence from the crime scene were strongest.
Jan Windsor, hotel staff, reported Andrew Klesich's behavior on the night of the murder as happy and normal. Police statements from accomplices detailed the conspiracy. Family members expressed disbelief in Klesich's guilt.
Follow-up reports included legal appeals, a high-profile inquiry reaffirming guilt, and parole decisions. New evidence and allegations of police corruption were raised but did not overturn convictions.
Exact motive remains partially uncertain, especially the role of Andrew's infatuation with Marlene Watson. Some family members maintain his innocence despite convictions.