RelationWatch
← Back to South Korea cases
OSINT Case File

Victim Woman, Internet Delivery Driver, and others Allegedly Murdered by Kim, Daegu, South Korea

Case Summary

On December 23, 2022, in Daegu, South Korea, a woman aged 51 was fatally burned in an arson attack by her former extramarital partner, Kim, in a commercial building dance hall. Kim had a history of violent offenses against women and had been in a brief extramarital relationship with the victim from April to November 2022. The attack involved pouring gasoline on the victim and two other men present, then setting the victim on fire. Kim was arrested the next day and later sentenced to 35 years in prison after appeal. The motive was retaliation for fraud charges and breakup, with financial extortion and jealousy as contributing factors.

Verified True
Confidence 3
Incident Date Dec. 23, 2022
Incident Type Domestic Violence Homicide

Basic Information

Country: South Korea

State/Province: None

City/Region: Daegu

Incident Type: Domestic Violence Homicide

Relationship Status: Extramarital relationship

Relationship Duration: Approximately 7 months

Incident Date: Dec. 23, 2022

Relationship Journey

Relationship Origins:

  • Met at Workplace
  • Friends circle

Relationship Stages:

  • Dating
  • Living Together without Marriage
  • Separated

Analysis

Contributing Factors:

  • Cheating / Infidelity
  • Financial Issues
  • Domestic Conflict
  • Divorce / Separation

Red Flags:

  • Escalation Pattern / Violence
  • Manipulative behavior
  • Threats
  • Firearm Access / Concerning Weapon Behavior
  • Divorce Pending / Recent Separation

Motives:

  • Money / Financial Gain
  • Revenge
  • Jealousy
  • Eliminate romantic partner

Relationship Outcomes:

  • Legal case ongoing
  • Homicide during marriage
  • Arrest made
  • Investigation still ongoing

People Link Graph

Relationship Journey Graph

1

Origin

  • Met at Workplace
  • Friends circle

How the relationship or connection began.

2

Status

  • Extramarital relationship

Approximately 7 months

3

Stages

  • Dating
  • Living Together without Marriage
  • Separated

Important relationship phases recorded for this case.

4

Warning Signals

  • Escalation Pattern / Violence
  • Manipulative behavior
  • Threats
  • Firearm Access / Concerning Weapon Behavior
  • Divorce Pending / Recent Separation

Reported red flags or early concern points.

5

Pressure Points

  • Cheating / Infidelity
  • Financial Issues
  • Domestic Conflict
  • Divorce / Separation
  • Money / Financial Gain
  • Revenge
  • Jealousy
  • Eliminate romantic partner

Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.

6

Incident

2022-12-23

7

Outcome

  • Legal case ongoing
  • Homicide during marriage
  • Arrest made
  • Investigation still ongoing

Recorded relationship or case outcome.

Sources

English labels are shown first. Original-language titles are preserved for source verification.

Victim Woman, Internet Delivery Driver, and others Allegedly Murdered by Kim, Daegu, South Korea

사건의뢰 · Original language: Korean

View original title

여자친구 얼굴에 휘발유를 뿌린 이유 l 대구 성인무도장 방화살인 사건 [치정]

AI Intelligence Assessment

Relationship Pattern

Jealousy

Pattern Analysis

The case involves an extramarital relationship marked by financial exploitation, jealousy, and escalating conflict. The suspect reacted violently to the victim's breakup and legal actions, culminating in a premeditated arson murder. The suspect's history of violence and repeated offenses against women indicates a pattern of controlling and abusive behavior fueled by jealousy and financial motives.

Investigative Notes

Police used CCTV footage to track suspect's escape and arrested him at a motel the next day. The suspect was charged with retaliatory murder, arson causing injury, and fraud. The trial recognized the retaliatory nature of the crime. The suspect appealed but received an increased sentence of 35 years and electronic monitoring. The victim's fraud complaint and breakup were key triggers. The suspect's prior criminal record includes attempted murder and threats involving arson and kidnapping.

Investigation Confusion

No significant confusion reported; suspect's identity and motive were clear from CCTV and investigation. Some uncertainty remains about the exact relationship of the injured male acquaintance to the victim.

Case Reconstruction / Puzzle Pieces

The suspect and victim met in April 2022 and had an extramarital relationship until November 2022. The suspect extorted money from the victim under false pretenses. After the victim filed a fraud complaint and broke up, the suspect planned the attack by purchasing gasoline and disguise items. On December 23, 2022, he poured gasoline on the victim and two men present, then set the victim on fire before fleeing. The suspect was tracked and arrested the next day. The trial confirmed the retaliatory motive and premeditation.

Risk Assessment

High risk of recidivism confirmed by risk assessment during trial; suspect has a history of violent offenses against intimate partners and demonstrated premeditation in this case.

Key Takeaways

Financial exploitation and jealousy in extramarital relationships can escalate to lethal violence. Prior violent history and failure to impose sufficient sentences may contribute to recidivism. Early legal actions by victims may trigger retaliatory violence. Surveillance footage and witness reports are critical for rapid suspect identification and arrest.

AI Case Q&A

What early signals mattered most?

Repeated financial extortion, jealousy accusations, and victim's filing of fraud complaint were early signals of escalating conflict.

Which clues helped connect the case?

CCTV footage of suspect fleeing with fire on body, victim's text messages demanding repayment, and suspect's prior criminal record helped connect the case.

Which evidence types appeared strongest?

CCTV video, victim's text messages, police interviews, and forensic analysis of arson scene were strongest evidence types.

Witness / Eyewitness Statements

Nearby merchant reported seeing a man running out of the building on fire; firefighters and forensic team confirmed flammable liquid spread on victims and floor; police statements from suspect and victims' texts provided context.

How did follow-up reports change the understanding?

Follow-up reports included trial outcomes, sentencing, and appeal results increasing sentence from 30 to 35 years; no new major facts changed initial understanding.

What remained unclear?

Exact nature of relationship between injured male acquaintance and victim remains unclear; details of suspect's financial expenditures are uncertain.

Add cases to private collections and export structured data. View plans

← Back to Home