On December 23, 2022, in Daegu, South Korea, a woman aged 51 was fatally burned in an arson attack by her former extramarital partner, Kim, in a commercial building dance hall. Kim had a history of violent offenses against women and had been in a brief extramarital relationship with the victim from April to November 2022. The attack involved pouring gasoline on the victim and two other men present, then setting the victim on fire. Kim was arrested the next day and later sentenced to 35 years in prison after appeal. The motive was retaliation for fraud charges and breakup, with financial extortion and jealousy as contributing factors.
Country: South Korea
State/Province: None
City/Region: Daegu
Incident Type: Domestic Violence Homicide
Relationship Status: Extramarital relationship
Relationship Duration: Approximately 7 months
Incident Date: Dec. 23, 2022
Relationship Origins:
Relationship Stages:
Contributing Factors:
Red Flags:
Motives:
Relationship Outcomes:
How the relationship or connection began.
Approximately 7 months
Important relationship phases recorded for this case.
Reported red flags or early concern points.
Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.
2022-12-23
Recorded relationship or case outcome.
English labels are shown first. Original-language titles are preserved for source verification.
사건의뢰 · Original language: Korean
여자친구 얼굴에 휘발유를 뿌린 이유 l 대구 성인무도장 방화살인 사건 [치정]
Jealousy
The case involves an extramarital relationship marked by financial exploitation, jealousy, and escalating conflict. The suspect reacted violently to the victim's breakup and legal actions, culminating in a premeditated arson murder. The suspect's history of violence and repeated offenses against women indicates a pattern of controlling and abusive behavior fueled by jealousy and financial motives.
Police used CCTV footage to track suspect's escape and arrested him at a motel the next day. The suspect was charged with retaliatory murder, arson causing injury, and fraud. The trial recognized the retaliatory nature of the crime. The suspect appealed but received an increased sentence of 35 years and electronic monitoring. The victim's fraud complaint and breakup were key triggers. The suspect's prior criminal record includes attempted murder and threats involving arson and kidnapping.
No significant confusion reported; suspect's identity and motive were clear from CCTV and investigation. Some uncertainty remains about the exact relationship of the injured male acquaintance to the victim.
The suspect and victim met in April 2022 and had an extramarital relationship until November 2022. The suspect extorted money from the victim under false pretenses. After the victim filed a fraud complaint and broke up, the suspect planned the attack by purchasing gasoline and disguise items. On December 23, 2022, he poured gasoline on the victim and two men present, then set the victim on fire before fleeing. The suspect was tracked and arrested the next day. The trial confirmed the retaliatory motive and premeditation.
High risk of recidivism confirmed by risk assessment during trial; suspect has a history of violent offenses against intimate partners and demonstrated premeditation in this case.
Financial exploitation and jealousy in extramarital relationships can escalate to lethal violence. Prior violent history and failure to impose sufficient sentences may contribute to recidivism. Early legal actions by victims may trigger retaliatory violence. Surveillance footage and witness reports are critical for rapid suspect identification and arrest.
Repeated financial extortion, jealousy accusations, and victim's filing of fraud complaint were early signals of escalating conflict.
CCTV footage of suspect fleeing with fire on body, victim's text messages demanding repayment, and suspect's prior criminal record helped connect the case.
CCTV video, victim's text messages, police interviews, and forensic analysis of arson scene were strongest evidence types.
Nearby merchant reported seeing a man running out of the building on fire; firefighters and forensic team confirmed flammable liquid spread on victims and floor; police statements from suspect and victims' texts provided context.
Follow-up reports included trial outcomes, sentencing, and appeal results increasing sentence from 30 to 35 years; no new major facts changed initial understanding.
Exact nature of relationship between injured male acquaintance and victim remains unclear; details of suspect's financial expenditures are uncertain.